On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:57 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 28, 4:45 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mabshoff wrote:
> > > On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What is the policy on breaking backward compatibility of pickling a
On Jun 28, 4:45 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the policy on breaking backward compatibility of pickling at
> major releases (e.g., 4.0)?
I would consider it unacceptable to break backward c
mabshoff wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jun 28, 1:55 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Carl,
>
>>> During Developer Days 1, I announced that I wanted to rewrite
>>> fast_float to support evaluation over more types, to handle common
>>> sub
On Jun 28, 2:16 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another question about the rewrite: does anybody mind if I break
> > unpickling of old pickled fast_float objects? I can make them work,
> > but it would require keeping around
On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 1:55 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Carl,
> > During Developer Days 1, I announced that I wanted to rewrite
> > fast_float to support evaluation over more types, to handle common
> > subexpressions, and to handl
On Jun 28, 1:55 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During Developer Days 1, I announced that I wanted to rewrite
> fast_float to support evaluation over more types, to handle common
> subexpressions, and to handle conditional expressions. I've started
> this project by writing a new vers
During Developer Days 1, I announced that I wanted to rewrite
fast_float to support evaluation over more types, to handle common
subexpressions, and to handle conditional expressions. I've started
this project by writing a new version of the fast_eval.pyx module
docstring, and I'm wondering if an
On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:18 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune wrote:
> On Jun 27, 11:50 am, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
>>
>> In general, the difference between
>> multivariate and univariate should not matter in practice.
>>
> +1
2008/6/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 2008/6/27 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could someone who knows orders
On Jun 27, 11:56 pm, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I'm just looking at the GMP spkg in sage to see what if any SAGE
> patches can be applied to mpir before we make our first release.
>
> Can someone tell me what the various patches do. I know what the
> fastgcd, gmp-4.2.1-core2-port
10 matches
Mail list logo
