On Nov 1, 7:19 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 17:13 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> > 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> > the way to the fina
On Oct 31, 2008, at 17:13 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> the way to the final 3.2. I plan to do another alpha3 in two days
> unless I run our of time in wh
I have used the Virtual Private Server company Slicehost which is now
owned by Rackspace, see http://slicehost.com. They have a web-based
control panel that makes it easy to restart a slice remotely. Is there
a plan to make the Sage servers at UW rebootable remotely?
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:40 P
William,
You should add Sage to the site SymbolicNet http://www.symbolicnet.org/,
I was surprised to find that Sage was not listed there. You will
probably find some useful info there too.
I came across this site: http://jscl-meditor.sourceforge.net/ which is
of interest also. Towards the botto
Done.
Hazem
On Nov 1, 8:08 pm, Hazem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will shortly write to the maintainer(s), and I've already identified
> a couple of e-mail addresses, however, I wouldn't be surprised if they
> bounce since they appear to be very old.
>
> The submission of the Sage site for aut
This problem was due to the fact that conversion to GAP just wasn't
implemented. I've posted a patch a
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4419 .
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fr
I will shortly write to the maintainer(s), and I've already identified
a couple of e-mail addresses, however, I wouldn't be surprised if they
bounce since they appear to be very old.
The submission of the Sage site for automatic inclusion via
http://www.computeralgebra.nl/call.html failed for so
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Gaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:05:13PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> Did you URL change from https://sagenb.org/something
>> to http://sagenb.org/something, or?
>
> From https://sage.math.washington.edu:8101/home/pub/41/
> to http:/
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Hazem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This page is out of date but definitely useful as a partial
> compilation of CAS systems - both general and specialized:
>
> http://www.computeralgebra.nl
>
> Worth looking into, if not already known to the developers of Sage.
This page is out of date but definitely useful as a partial
compilation of CAS systems - both general and specialized:
http://www.computeralgebra.nl
Worth looking into, if not already known to the developers of Sage.
best regards,
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
On Saturday 01 November 2008, mmarco wrote:
> I agree that, when it is possible, it is better to work in exact
> rings. But sometimes (not in this particular example, but in other
> similar ones) you actually need to use complex numbers. I guess there
> is a way to do it in an alggebraic extension
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Gaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi William, hi sage developpers,
>>
>> I have been trying to send e-mail to this group from my main mail
>> account,
>> but it is failing, so I'll just use gmail (Google got me).
>>
>> So, the sagenb.org ser
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:05:13PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Did you URL change from https://sagenb.org/something
> to http://sagenb.org/something, or?
>From https://sage.math.washington.edu:8101/home/pub/41/
to http://sagenb.org/home/pub/41/
> Generally, if you have your own webspace, it wo
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Gaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi William, hi sage developpers,
>
> I have been trying to send e-mail to this group from my main mail
> account,
> but it is failing, so I'll just use gmail (Google got me).
>
> So, the sagenb.org server has been reset (yeah, fo
Hi William, hi sage developpers,
I have been trying to send e-mail to this group from my main mail
account,
but it is failing, so I'll just use gmail (Google got me).
So, the sagenb.org server has been reset (yeah, fork bombs, nice) :(.
I was planning to link to a notebook in an article I am pub
I agree that, when it is possible, it is better to work in exact
rings. But sometimes (not in this particular example, but in other
similar ones) you actually need to use complex numbers. I guess there
is a way to do it in an alggebraic extension of Q, but i am not sure
how to handle that with sag
On Nov 1, 2008, at 6:28 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> In principle, it's possible to insert a try except clause into the
> plot command,
> so that it would
>
> try:
> plot(x^2,2,10)
> except:
> plot(lambda x:real(zeta(x)),2,10)
>
> There might be more efficient solutions though.
I think this
On the third pass of sage -testall, it appears that sage -testall is also
hanging on tut.tex, but when I reran the verbose option it passed fine.
On to pass #4
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that sage -testall is also hanging on
> devel/
It appears that sage -testall is also hanging on
devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py
but when I reran the verbose option it passed fine.
Again, this is on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 7:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
>> Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
>> that is supposed t
On Nov 1, 7:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
> Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
> that is supposed to take a long time?
>
Nope, just kill the python process and rerun the test w
It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
that is supposed to take a long time?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should f
Two build reports for alpha2:
Successful build on my laptop (ubuntu 32-bit). THe only doctest
failures are in caclulus.py:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
**
File "/home/john/sage-3.2.alpha2/tmp/calculus.py", line
On Nov 1, 6:21 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I know about plot?. But you misread my post. I was not trying to
> type Maple commands into Sage.
>
> I was wondering why there should be such a blatant difference
> between plotting x->x^2 and plotting the zeta function on
In principle, it's possible to insert a try except clause into the plot command,
so that it would
try:
plot(x^2,2,10)
except:
plot(lambda x:real(zeta(x)),2,10)
There might be more efficient solutions though.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I
I know about plot?. But you misread my post. I was not trying to
type Maple commands into Sage.
I was wondering why there should be such a blatant difference
between plotting x->x^2 and plotting the zeta function on an interval
on the real axis. My point was that Maple shows this is not necessary
Agreed. In fact, it seems to me the proper syntax is
sage: p = gap(PermutationGroupElement('(1,2,3)'))
sage: q = gap(PermutationGroupElement('()'))
sage: gap.Group([p, q])
Group( [ (1,2,3), () ] )
sage: gap.Group([p]) == gap.Group([p, q])
True
and here it all works fine. I think Permutation (whi
On Nov 1, 5:37 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand,
>
> sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"])
> Group( [ (1,2), () ] )
> sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
> Group( [ (1,2) ] )
> sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"]) == gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
> True
>
> so GAP does allow the identity as
On Nov 1, 1:14 am, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I think this is a bit weird, in 3.2.alpha0. Should I make a trac ticket?
>
> > sage: p = gap(Permutation('(1,2,3)'))
> > sage: q = gap(Permutation([()]))
> > sage: gap.Group([p, q])
>
> [...]
>
> I
On the other hand,
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"])
Group( [ (1,2), () ] )
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
Group( [ (1,2) ] )
sage: gap.Group(["(1,2)","()"]) == gap.Group(["(1,2)"])
True
so GAP does allow the identity as a member of the list of generators.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Minh Nguyen
On Oct 31, 11:27 pm, Michael Brickenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even, if that bug wouldn't exist, I can only recommend
> to do such computation over the rationals, if possible.
>
> Gröbner bases and similar computations (like syzygies) over floating
> point numbers are
> very problematic:
On Nov 1, 3:12 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> How about making up a wiki page with all those in and asking for
> volunteers to sign up? It would also be helpful if the optional
> packages needed by each were noted (if that is easy to determine).
> I'm certainly happy t
On Nov 1, 4:59 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I want to make a simple plot for a talk. As an experiment I try
>
> plot(x^2,2,10) (*)
>
> and it works as expected. So happily I go for the real thing
>
> plot(zeta(x),2,10) (**)
>
> Unfortunately I get a long l
On Nov 1, 5:08 am, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Georg,
> Sage3.2.alpha2 built fine on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 /
> Xcode 2.5.
Good.
> Due most probably to the patch from trac ticket #788, several doctests
> throw numerical noise errors.
Yeah, that was to b
Hi,
Sage3.2.alpha2 built fine on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 /
Xcode 2.5.
Due most probably to the patch from trac ticket #788, several doctests
throw numerical noise errors.
Here are the first ones (doctesting is not complete yet):
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
**
I want to make a simple plot for a talk. As an experiment I try
plot(x^2,2,10) (*)
and it works as expected. So happily I go for the real thing
plot(zeta(x),2,10) (**)
Unfortunately I get a long list of exceptions but no clear indication
what the problem is.
plot(zeta,2,10)(*)
Maybe its a bit off topic but in the line of thought:
I wonder whether the subset of the reals generated by
+,-,*,/,x^y,log_x y from {1} (that means it contains at least Q)
is decidable (i.e. whether we can decide equality for two given
expressions in the operations and 1).
For a start we could
How about making up a wiki page with all those in and asking for
volunteers to sign up? It would also be helpful if the optional
packages needed by each were noted (if that is easy to determine).
I'm certainly happy to see to the three (?) elliptic curves ones.
John
2008/11/1 mabshoff <[EMAIL P
Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a bit weird, in 3.2.alpha0. Should I make a trac ticket?
>
> sage: p = gap(Permutation('(1,2,3)'))
> sage: q = gap(Permutation([()]))
> sage: gap.Group([p, q])
[...]
I receive a similar error using 3.1.4:
---
Hi,
I think this is a bit weird, in 3.2.alpha0. Should I make a trac ticket?
sage: p = gap(Permutation('(1,2,3)'))
sage: q = gap(Permutation([()]))
sage: gap.Group([p, q])
---
TypeError Traceb
40 matches
Mail list logo
