On Nov 23, 1:19 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I can see the benefits, and the only cost is in someone other
> >> than me making it work...which makes it rather easy to vote +!
>
> > Yes, I always vot
I hacked together an application for my own personal use that can be
used as a launcher for Sage, though I decided to share it, since I'm
quite sure someone will find it useful. It consists of a bash shell
script packaged in a small .app bundle. I'm not as familiar with
shell scripts as I'd like
On Nov 23, 5:55 pm, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Dom, 2008-11-23 às 14:15 -0800, mabshoff escreveu:
>
> > On Nov 23, 2:10 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sounds good to me.
> > > Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
> > > are p
On Nov 23, 5:40 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I am lazy and do not want to write 150 emails to various
> > people :). So can people with trac accounts who read this opt in via
> > the list or add themselves at the bottom
> > ofhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/
On Nov 23, 3:37 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0.
On Intel Mac OS X 10.5: built successfully, sage -testlong returned
three known issues:
#3758, sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py
#3760, sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_cu
Em Dom, 2008-11-23 às 14:15 -0800, mabshoff escreveu:
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2:10 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds good to me.
> > Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
> > are planning?
>
> We could restrict the page to people with logins, but
On Nov 23, 2:18 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2:12 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
> > > before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think. There
> > > is a privacy issue,
When I say "simple" I mean really, really, REALLY simple. So simple
it's intuitive for non-programmers. I can program and I could always
run Python scripts or use command line interfaces myself, but I have
friends who want something even easier. My friends are pretty smart,
they're just not pro
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
>>> Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't
>>> have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over
>>> ZZ.
>> Macaulay 2, version 1.1
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:23 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> IMHO, a numerical pde solver wuld be a very useful addition to Sage,
> even if only
> as an optional package.
>
There are two that would be excellent additions,
Trilinos - http://trilinos.sandia.gov/
PETSc - http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/
On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
Hi Jaap,
> > Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't
> > have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over
> > ZZ.
>
> Macaulay 2, version 1.1
> with packages: Classic, Co
My hope is that when they understand the additional benefits of distributing
it with GPL they can change it. Since, someone asked them to use it for
commercial purposes, they allowed for it in the latest license. I am still
hopeful :) Also, I think you are right about the difficultie of tcl/tk. At
Hi William,
Thanks a lot for that, it works now. The last command took a long time
(an hour or so).
Stan
William Stein wrote:
>
> The upgrade failed somehow. Try this:
>
> sage: hg_sage.pull()
> sage: hg_sage.merge()
> sage: quit
>
> sage -br
>
> and see if things are any better.
>
> William
Thanks for the clarification. This is definitely not an open source in the
sense of OSI. I would call this "publically available source" with a
non-commercial license. It would be less confusing to readers like me
if you reworded your webpage, replacing "open source" by something else.
(You might
On Nov 23, 2:13 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
> > before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think.
>
> Damn! There are a lo
On Nov 23, 2:12 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
> > before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think. There
> > is a privacy issue, so should this be opt in or opt out?
>
> Great idea but I think it
I also think opt in is the way to go, to avoid things like:
trac account: batman
real name: Bruce Wayne
So how about *creating* the wiki page, then telling people to enter their
own info if they want to. With the understanding that if they prefer not
to, then it is likely that their email addres
On Nov 23, 2:10 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
> Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
> are planning?
We could restrict the page to people with logins, but that doesn't fix
the privacy issue.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
>>> The following tests failed:
>>>sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
> before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think.
Damn! There are a lot of Sage developers. If 150 people have actually got
accounts to do Sag
On Nov 23, 2:01 pm, "ahmet alper parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Firstly, I want to use it with R and with some other packages in which I can
> signal process, optimize etc (there are many opportunities I think) and I
> want to exchange data with opensees. Yes it is opensource but with
> We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
> before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think. There
> is a privacy issue, so should this be opt in or opt out?
Great idea but I think it should be opt in: better save than sorry.
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Mart
On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
> >> Hello folks,
>
> >> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
> >> total number of ticket with patches is
Sounds good to me.
Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
are planning?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> when one wants to add people to the CC field in trac one can either
> use a full email address or a per
For backward compatibility (for those who have written many of their codes
with both Opensees and tcl/tk), I would like to support the existing tcl/tk
layer. So it seems I have to do this one.
{
If you're willing to put in a lot more work for better performance (or
if tkinter just works), you coul
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
>> total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
>> guess I don't need to point out that there
Hello folks,
when one wants to add people to the CC field in trac one can either
use a full email address or a person's trac account name. The later
one is strongly preferred since it will prevent spam harvesters from
collecting that email address. The problem now for many people seems
to be the
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
> total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
> guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
> to go around :). The door before the big ReST tra
Firstly, I want to use it with R and with some other packages in which I can
signal process, optimize etc (there are many opportunities I think) and I
want to exchange data with opensees. Yes it is opensource but with the
restriction that you can distribute it for noncommercial purposes but you
can
Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> >
> > Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
> >> and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure eve
Hi Michael,
Of course, the Trac! Didn't think of that.
Since we claim on the download-source.html that changelog.txt is "a very
high level changelog", I would vote for keeping this one. I find it a
lot more convenient than looking through the Trac tickets.
Stan
--~--~-~--~~-
On Nov 23, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
>> and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
>> is built and installed correctly. I'd like to
Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
> and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
> is built and installed correctly. I'd like to run them before I start
> exploring FriCAS.
Do you m
On Nov 23, 1:22 pm, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hi Stan,
> This is not of a very high priority, but I just noticed that the
> newest entry inhttp://www.sagemath.org/src/changelog.txtis:
>
> July 09, 2008
> -
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0.4 has been
Hello everyone,
This is not of a very high priority, but I just noticed that the
newest entry in http://www.sagemath.org/src/changelog.txt is:
July 09, 2008
-
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0.4 has been released on July 9th, 2008.
Is there another way of getting a summary of the changes in t
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hm, I did a sage -upgrade on Mac OS X 10.4.11 on a MacBook Pro and
> everything worked fine. When I start sage, it tells me that it is
> "Sage Version 3.2, Release Date: 2008-11-20", but when I open a
> notebook and t
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 1:03 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all against
>> this?
>
> Not that I can see. The main reason we chose clisp over gcl for
>
On Nov 23, 9:30 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is because the file sage/libs/gmp/__init__.py is missing in the
> sage-3.2.1.alpha0 spkg . (The file is present in the Mercurial
> repository, but it's not checked out
2008/11/23 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Nov 23, 1:03 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all against
>> this?
>
> Not that I can see. The main reason we chose clisp over gcl for
> example that it worked bette
On Nov 23, 1:03 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all against
> this?
Not that I can see. The main reason we chose clisp over gcl for
example that it worked better than any other lisp implementation
supported by Maxima
Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all against
this? I can see the benefits, and the only cost is in someone other
than me making it work...which makes it rather easy to vote +!
John
2008/11/23 Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> thi
+1
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
> official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
> the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl i
Hm, I did a sage -upgrade on Mac OS X 10.4.11 on a MacBook Pro and
everything worked fine. When I start sage, it tells me that it is
"Sage Version 3.2, Release Date: 2008-11-20", but when I open a
notebook and type version(), it returns: 'SAGE Version 3.1.4, Release
Date: 2008-10-20'. Both the com
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
> official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
> the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl is
> faster, builds and works on way more platforms includi
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:08 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Konrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 2008/11/23 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
Carl Witty wrote:
> On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>>
>>
>> /home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage-main/sage/structure/../ext/cdefs.pxi:32:0:
>> 'sage.libs.gmp.all.pxd' not found
>
> Thi
On Nov 23, 12:32 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Witty wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >>
>
> >> /home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage-main/sage/structure
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:18 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
> official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
> the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl is
>
Since I brought it up.
+1
On Nov 23, 2008, at 3:18 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
> official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
> the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl
Hello folks,
this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl is
faster, builds and works on way more platforms including 32 and 64 bit
MSVC and ha
On Nov 23, 2008, at 3:07 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 23, 12:04 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
>>> and I was
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Konrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/11/23 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
>> following accounts are using more than 1GB space and on case your name
>> is one
On Nov 23, 12:04 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
> > and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
On Nov 23, 12:04 pm, "Konrad Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/23 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
> > following accounts are using more than 1GB space and on case your name
> > is one the
2008/11/23 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
> following accounts are using more than 1GB space and on case your name
> is one the list you should consider cleaning up unused files.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
> and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
> is built and installed correctly. I'd like to run them before I start
>
Hi,
I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
is built and installed correctly. I'd like to run them before I start
exploring FriCAS.
Oh, what happened to the plan of switching to ECL for lisp?
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:43 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Jeff Pickhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Professor Stein,
>>
>> Hi, my name is Jeff Pickhardt and I'm trying to make a really simple
>> but powerful calculator. I went to this summe
On Nov 23, 8:44 am, "ahmet alper parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,I want to integrate Opensees program into Sage. How can I do that? It is
> extending the tcl language with its own commands. Its site
> ishttp://opensees.berkeley.edu. If anyone has something tp comment on this
> issue, they
If I read the webpage correctly, Opensees requires tcl/tk
and is open source. Is this correct? I could not find a
license file in the code and the "open source" link
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/open.html
did not work for me.
To get to your question, I think you can start by reading
http
On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
> > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
> > guess I don't need to point out that there is still pl
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
> total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
> guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
> to go around :). The door before the big ReST tra
Sorry for the missing information. It is a finite element framework.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:44 PM, ahmet alper parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,I want to integrate Opensees program into Sage. How can I do that? It
> is extending the tcl language with its own commands. Its site is
> http:/
Hi,I want to integrate Opensees program into Sage. How can I do that? It is
extending the tcl language with its own commands. Its site is
http://opensees.berkeley.edu. If anyone has something tp comment on this
issue, they are welcome.
Regards...
AAP
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
to go around :). The door before the big ReST transition is slowly
closing, b
Dear Guillaume,
On Nov 23, 2:33 am, Guillaume Moroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool: I modified this python script, ran some tests and now the
> singular interface is well used for fraction field coefficients :D.
Good!
If I remember correctly, long-time ago I did something into that
direction,
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Guillaume Moroz wrote:
> Youps, there was a little problem in my patch for the univariate
> fraction field case. This patch replaces the previous one.
Hi there,
the patch looks good! We've got two options now.
Either one of the Sage developers takes care of the patch
Hello folks,
we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
following accounts are using more than 1GB space and on case your name
is one the list you should consider cleaning up unused files.
Cheers,
Michael
1.9Gabhinav
5.5Gacgetchell
4.3Gadam
1.4Gaklem
On Nov 23, 2:04 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 1:57 am, "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > I remember that the question of whether Sage could be ported to CUDA and run
> > on nvidia's GPUs was already brought up on this list. Here's another
> >
On Nov 23, 1:57 am, "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I remember that the question of whether Sage could be ported to CUDA and run
> on nvidia's GPUs was already brought up on this list. Here's another
> incentive to think about it:
>
> http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/11
Hi folks,
I remember that the question of whether Sage could be ported to CUDA and run
on nvidia's GPUs was already brought up on this list. Here's another
incentive to think about it:
http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/11/23/068234.shtml
OK, I'll stop drooling now.
Best,
Alex
--
Alex Ghitza
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.
On Nov 23, 12:03 am, Kwankyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Kwankyu,
> I want to make a patch for the file "sage/local/bin/sage-notebook".
> What is the corresponding file that I should edit in "sage/devel/sage-
> main" tree? Perhaps I am confused.
There are several hg repos in Sage. Bes
Hi,
I want to make a patch for the file "sage/local/bin/sage-notebook".
What is the corresponding file that I should edit in "sage/devel/sage-
main" tree? Perhaps I am confused.
Kwankyu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@google
74 matches
Mail list logo
