On Feb 20, 10:55 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > Except Harald, everybody's last name starts with a letter that is at
> > the top of the alphabet. And Harald is the webmaster, so I'm guessing
> > they mailed him, then just started down the
Hello folks,
Sage 3.3.rc3 is out and available in the usual place at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/
We merged a bunch of fixes and hopefully all doctest issues will have
been resolved. So far only two issues have cropped up that will go
into 3.3.final:
#53
All tests passed for rc3 on my intel mac running 10.4.11.
-M.Hampton
On Feb 21, 8:30 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 20, 9:41 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 9:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, it might not be as elegant as my solution and I think in some
> > circumstances you wi
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Nick Alexander
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20-Feb-09, at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi sage-devel,
>>>
>>> Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-
>>> mail (note
>>> tha
On Feb 20, 9:41 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 20, 9:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Well, it might not be as elegant as my solution and I think in some
> circumstances you will have a hard time getting ATLAS to work with
> this approach at all, but given that we need to get 3.3 out and it is
>
On Feb 20, 9:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:14 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Because at some point there was a failure the makefile errors out at
> > the very end even though it all worked. So the script you wrote is
> > likely to hit the same bug unless you completely c
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > I refereed #5318 which should definitely go in. It is a major
> > performance mistake in the new multiedges digraph plotting code that
> > came up during the status reports today.
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I refereed #5318 which should definitely go in. It is a major
> performance mistake in the new multiedges digraph plotting code that
> came up during the status reports today.
I'm guessing you mean #5327? Because #5318 has not been review
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:14 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 8:59 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 8:42 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>> > In the above example the restart happened exactly once, then the build
>> > failed later and I got an error about the machine being too loaded.
>>
On Feb 20, 8:59 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:42 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > In the above example the restart happened exactly once, then the build
> > failed later and I got an error about the machine being too loaded.
> > The script thus didn't successfully do the job it is supposed
On Feb 20, 8:42 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:34 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 8:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >> > Hi,
>
> >> > I did have at least two boxes where Atlas fails to build. Is there a
> >>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:34 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 8:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > I did have at least two boxes where Atlas fails to build. Is there a
>> > flag I have to set so it auto-restarts??
>>
>> >
On Feb 20, 8:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I did have at least two boxes where Atlas fails to build. Is there a
> > flag I have to set so it auto-restarts??
>
> > chmod: cannot access
> > `/space/wstein/farm/sage-3.3.rc3/loca
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> Hi people,
> hope you don't get offended since I joined this group by simply being
> a pretty enthusiastic SAGE user.
>
> I am an electronic engineer, so I try to build up myself the tool I
> find missing (or simply I can't catch) in this softw
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did have at least two boxes where Atlas fails to build. Is there a
> flag I have to set so it auto-restarts??
>
> chmod: cannot access
> `/space/wstein/farm/sage-3.3.rc3/local/lib/libptf77blas.a': No such
> file or directory
> mak
Hi,
No, you're logging into the right server. The hardware was changed out
for new hardware in mid-December, so you should just go ahead and
delete the old key from .ssh/known_hosts ... Feel free to email back
if you want instructions on doing that. :)
-cc
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Phaed
Hi all,
I'm beginning my weekend of Sage asceticism, and as I attempt to login to
the sage server after many months, I get the attached error message. Am I
trying to ssh into the wrong server?
Macintosh-7:~ phaedonsinis$ ssh sage.math.washington.edu -l psinis
Hi,
I did have at least two boxes where Atlas fails to build. Is there a
flag I have to set so it auto-restarts??
chmod: cannot access
`/space/wstein/farm/sage-3.3.rc3/local/lib/libptf77blas.a': No such
file or directory
make[3]: [install_lib] Error 1 (ignored)
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/spac
unfortunately, I don't have the code with me right now (I could give
you on monday), but I'm pretty sure it is something REALLY
straightforward and not optimized, like this:
def coll(expr,s):
import sympy as sp
spexpr = sp.sympify(expand(expr))
temp = sp.collect(spexpr,s)
return t
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
...
>
> Example: it seems to me that there is no built-in implementation of
> the "collect()" function in SAGE, though there is a (seemingly)
> working one in SymPy. So I wrote myself a very simple function whose
> argument is a SAGE Symbolic E
Hi people,
hope you don't get offended since I joined this group by simply being
a pretty enthusiastic SAGE user.
I am an electronic engineer, so I try to build up myself the tool I
find missing (or simply I can't catch) in this software.
I am wondering what do you think about simplifying the ac
On Feb 20, 2:34 pm, mark mcclure wrote:
Hi Mark,
> After installing the new spkg, sage compiled, Sage.app built,
> and all but the following three tests passed:
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py"
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/package.py"
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/plot/p
After installing the new spkg, sage compiled, Sage.app built,
and all but the following three tests passed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/package.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py"
Mark McClure
--~--~-~--~~~
Ed M. wrote:
> On Jan 30, 12:01 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> David Joyner wrote:
>>
> ...
>
>> That said, it looks like we don't distribute the basemap extension to
>> matplotlib by default. It's big (100MB tarball); it contains lots of
>> data by default. It would be nice to have an
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 10:18 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
>> I'd do something like this:
>
> yes, thanks. it's just not very intuitive because you have to know the
> solution_dict parameter in advance. i don't know, but it would be
> interesting if a syntax l
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 20-Feb-09, at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi sage-devel,
>>
>> Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-
>> mail (note
>> that William is not in that list). I wonder who else received it? Any
>>
On 20-Feb-09, at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-
> mail (note
> that William is not in that list). I wonder who else received it? Any
> thoughts on the matter?
Moi aussi. I'm too busy to be involved.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-mail (note
> that William is not in that list). I wonder who else received it? Any
> thoughts on the matter?
Write back and ask if we can keep copyri
Maxima's solve sometimes produces answers (assuming they can be found)
as lists of equations, e.g. [x=a,y=b].
The syntax for substitution has several versions.
subst(3,x,x+y) ---> y+3.
subst(x=3,x,x+y)
subst([x=3,y=4],x+y) --> 7
Solve can also produce systems of solutions, e.g.
sols
I received it too.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-mail (note
> that William is not in that list). I wonder who else received it? Any
> thoughts on the matter?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
Hi sage-devel,
Michael Abshoff, Harald Schilly and myself received the following e-mail (note
that William is not in that list). I wonder who else received it? Any
thoughts on the matter?
Cheers,
Martin
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Potential Sage Book
Date: Friday 20 Fe
On Feb 20, 8:22 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> On Feb 20, 9:18 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 6:08 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> > I screwed up, please try again. The problem is that I created a tar.gz
> > instead of a tar.bzip2.
>
> I had a feeling it was something like this.
Well, it happens
On Feb 20, 9:18 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 20, 6:08 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> I screwed up, please try again. The problem is that I created a tar.gz
> instead of a tar.bzip2.
I had a feeling it was something like this.
I had a class this morning and have only just started the build.
It is ru
I have a copy on my ipod Touch. It is nice for quick computations and
doing simple integrations you cannot remember and don't want to dig
through a table for. It is to hard to use for major computations, but
I can imagine setting it up with scripts to do things you would have
to do repeatedly
On Feb 20, 6:08 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:47 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Well, it doesn't look so good right now. I've tried two
> things:
> 1) Before you responded, I simply manually placed the
> spkg in the spkg/standard subdirectory of a freshly
> untarred sage-3.3.rc2 fold
On Feb 20, 8:47 am, mabshoff wrote:
> The spkg needs to be found by Sage. One way is to download it and
> place it into $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard, i.e.
>
> cd spkg/standard
> curlhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/gmp-mpir-0.9.spkg
> -o gmp-mpir-0.9.spkg
>
> then restart the bui
On Feb 20, 5:42 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:34 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > please
> > tryhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/gmp-mpir-0.9.spkg
> > and report back as soon as possible. I am down to 4 tickets (including
> > this one) for Sage 3.3.rc3 which will likely be
Sage 3.3.rc3 is about done - we are down to several tickets, some of
which are low hanging fruit, some are in review, some are open and
might get bumped. Since there won't be any 3.3 binaries due to 3.4
happening rather quickly afterwards we will bump various problems with
the OSX App bundle for e
On Feb 20, 8:34 am, mabshoff wrote:
> please tryhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/gmp-mpir-0.9.spkg
> and report back as soon as possible. I am down to 4 tickets (including
> this one) for Sage 3.3.rc3 which will likely be identical to the final
> 3.3.
I probably should have men
> Hi Michael,
Hi Mark,
> I could definitely do that today.
please try http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/gmp-mpir-0.9.spkg
and report back as soon as possible. I am down to 4 tickets (including
this one) for Sage 3.3.rc3 which will likely be identical to the final
3.3.
> Mark
On Feb 20, 12:35 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 18, 10:41 am, mark mcclure wrote:
>
> > I get an error building GMP on my MacBook Pro running
> > OS X 10.4.11.
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I haven't gotten to this yet, but I have made this
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5315
>
> If you are
> Now I agree. The difficult part is having three latex processes with
> three sentinels.
That's it!
I shifted to the version shipped with sage-mode-0.5.2 this morning. I'll
be away for a couple of days, so you'll hopefully get the multiple
outputs stuff in the middle of next week.
Regards,
On Feb 20, 1:37 am, Michel wrote:
> +1
+1 from me too once we sort out all the small issues like building,
etc. License as well as build requirements are met for inclusion into
Sage. It is also certainly fast :)
> The default factor command in sage is rather slow.
Note that there is mpQS fro
+1
The default factor command in sage is rather slow.
On Feb 19, 9:48 am, jeffblakeslee wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
> includes an interface file and an .spkg. Msieve, by Jason
> Papadopoulos, should increase the integer factoriz
44 matches
Mail list logo
