On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:33 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>>
>> Here's how I got it. Ctrl-c after a couple seconds on the first one,
>> and then try the next.
>> --
>> | SAGE Ve
Michael Abshoff wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Hmm, two possibilities:
>>>
>>> (a) This is a 32 bit issue, but since William tested that code on OSX
>>> I doubt it.
>>> (b) You have multiple heads, so please check. Maybe otherwise there
>>> is also junk
In case you hadn't noticed 3.4.1.rc0 is out. The main problem is that
it does not even build on OSX (yet) due to two trivial bugs in new
version of MPIR and FLINT. I have fixed both of them and in the
process of putting together 3.4.1.rc1 which should at least build on
all test platforms :)
All t
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Hmm, two possibilities:
>>
>> (a) This is a 32 bit issue, but since William tested that code on OSX
>> I doubt it.
>> (b) You have multiple heads, so please check. Maybe otherwise there
>> is also junk laying around for you somewhere that
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 5, 8:03 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> On Fedora 9, 32 bit, upgraded from 3.4.1.alpha0:
>>
>> The following tests failed:
>>
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
>> Tot
On Apr 5, 2:31 pm, John Cremona wrote:
Hi John,
> Built ok and all tests passed on 32-bit ubuntu.
>
> On Suse 64-bit, built ok and one failure:
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_bundle.py"
>
> --retesting (several times) it passed ok. The releva
On Apr 5, 8:03 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> On Fedora 9, 32 bit, upgraded from 3.4.1.alpha0:
>
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
> Total time for all tests: 9109.8
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> My recommendation is:
>
> \frac{\mathrm{d} f(x)}{\mathrm{d} x}
>
> This ensures an upright d. It's what I use for all derivatives based
> upon
> "A Guide to LaTeX". Also, I'm not sure you really need to use \left and
> \right for a single term. I
Built ok and all tests passed on 32-bit ubuntu.
On Suse 64-bit, built ok and one failure:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_bundle.py"
--retesting (several times) it passed ok. The relevant pasrt of the
test log is this:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/grap
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:58 PM, rjf wrote:
>> So here are the situations
>>
>> (1) diff( f(x), x) =>
>>
>> (a) Current scheme via Maxima:
>> {{{\it \partial}}\over{{\it \partial}\,x}}\,f\left(x\right)
>>
>> (b) Proposed:
>> \frac{d f\left(x\right)}{d x}
>>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:33 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's how I got it. Ctrl-c after a couple seconds on the first one,
>>> and then try the next.
>>>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:33 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>>
>> Here's how I got it. Ctrl-c after a couple seconds on the first one,
>> and then try the next.
>> --
>> | SAGE Ve
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM, rjf wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 5, 9:06 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>>>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>> On Apr 5, 9:06 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> This does not seem to be true.
>>
>> I just ran Maxima on 'diff(f(x),x)
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 9:06 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Apr 3, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>
>> >>> (1) \int dx f(x)
>> >>> (2) \int f(x) dx
>>
>> >>
On Apr 5, 9:06 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 3, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> >>> (1) \int dx f(x)
> >>> (2) \int f(x) dx
>
> >> I prefer (2).
>
> > I've actually never seen (1) used; (2) see
Hi,
There is an open source conference in Portland June 17–19 and if any
Sage developer will be there it would be good if they could give a
Sage talk. See below.
William
-- Forwarded message --
From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Date: Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Subject: Open Sour
On Apr 5, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>
(1) \int dx f(x)
(2) \int f(x) dx
>>>
>>> I prefer (2).
>>
>> I've actually never seen (1) used
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>>> (1) \int dx f(x)
>>> (2) \int f(x) dx
>>
>> I prefer (2).
>
> I've actually never seen (1) used; (2) seems much more natural. The
> "\int dx \int dy f" is strange as the "dx
On Apr 5, 3:40 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Apr 5, 4:34 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > the main
> > problem seems to be that the timeline can now be accessed at any point
> > you want and each ticket has a link to jump to the the point of the
> > timeline when it was created. This is quite expens
On Fedora 9, 32 bit, upgraded from 3.4.1.alpha0:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
Total time for all tests: 9109.8 seconds
Please see /home/jaap/downloads/sage-3.4.1
On Apr 5, 4:34 am, mabshoff wrote:
> the main
> problem seems to be that the timeline can now be accessed at any point
> you want and each ticket has a link to jump to the the point of the
> timeline when it was created. This is quite expensive for the database
> to construct ...
sounds like tra
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:33 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>
> Here's how I got it. Ctrl-c after a couple seconds on the first one,
> and then try the next.
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.0.6, Release Date: 2008-07-30
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Timothy Clemans
wrote:
>
> On sagenb.org I'm getting "Internal Server Error" when I click on
> "Create worksheet"
>
I fixed this and posted a patch to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5687 so you can finish
refereeing it.
William
--~--~-~--~---
Here's how I got it. Ctrl-c after a couple seconds on the first one,
and then try the next.
--
| SAGE Version 3.0.6, Release Date: 2008-07-30 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.
On sagenb.org I'm getting "Internal Server Error" when I click on
"Create worksheet"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mo
26 matches
Mail list logo
