Hi Lucio,
Tried another machine - works great! Three suggestions:
1. Can you put up a few lines that tell a user to type "startx" when
they get the first prompt (assuming you can't just totally automate
it)?
2. Both machines I used have high-resolution screens so the terminal
window was very
This is very useful, I will definately use it. An extended version can
have a list of the similar commands in Mathematica,Maple,Matlab (to
decrease the anxiety for the new converts). Something like
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users a page I find more useful
than the whole numpy manual.
Gonzalo,
I don't think you have anything to apologize for relative to your
participation in this thread. To the contrary, your key questions
halfway through (that ended up in some other thread), I thought did a
perfect job of capturing the debate.
Your English is great and your Latin is even be
I've put together a quick reference sheet (two pages) for linear
algebra commands in Sage. I'll do a bit more clean-up on this before
posting a final copy on the wiki in a couple days, so I know there is
a bit more work to do. Specifically, I might reorder the sections if
I come up with a more l
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Rado wrote:
>
> Btw, I finished the rudimentary version of the live editor.
>
> http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/processing/grapheditor_live.html
>
> Click the "live" checkbox to see the vertices rearrange is real time.
> My implementation is quite simplistic (no
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
>> Indeed... but the OP claimed that a jpeg couldn't be a derived work of
>> gimp because it's not a C++ program, which is a non sequitur.
>
> Do you actually think a JPEG is a derived for of GIMP or do you
> disagree with how I was arguing?
Hi,
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>> > All the bits are in the usual place in
>>
>> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.2/
>>
> Binaries have been build and should show up in the next 24 hours on
> the main sage site and then mirror out.
Are th
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:55:57AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
> Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
> patches?
Let me do the same for the prerequisite patches for the category
framework. They are all in trac now. Having them (or most of them) in
Sage would defini
John Cremona wrote:
> 2009/5/8 Ondrej Certik :
>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Cremona
wrote:
> I had rather assumed that the new list was never intended to be read
> by anyone anyway
2009/5/8 Ondrej Certik :
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>>
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
I had rather assumed that the new list was never intended to be read
by anyone anyway
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean
On May 8, 2009, at 10:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> Also
>>
>> sage: sqrt(SR(16))
>> sqrt(16)
>> sage: 27^(1/3)
>> 27^(1/3)
>
> The little patch I posted to
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5930
> fixes
>
> sage: sqr
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 4:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 7, 2009, at 4:10 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>>
Hello all,
I've been doing a lot of work rece
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>>> I had rather assumed that the new list was never intended to be read
>>> by anyone anyway
>>
>> Not sure what you mean. I thought William has asked to move
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>> I had rather assumed that the new list was never intended to be read
>> by anyone anyway
>
> Not sure what you mean. I thought William has asked to move the
> discussion there, but I hope he didn't mean that noone
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/5/8 William Stein :
>>
I've just set the sage-flame list to be completely unmoderated, which
seems appropriate for sage-flame.
>>>
>>> I hope it will not be spammed. If the sympy list was not moderated,
>>> it'd be full of sp
2009/5/8 William Stein :
>
>>> I've just set the sage-flame list to be completely unmoderated, which
>>> seems appropriate for sage-flame.
>>
>> I hope it will not be spammed. If the sympy list was not moderated,
>> it'd be full of spam already.
>
> Good point. That usually only happens after a
>> I've just set the sage-flame list to be completely unmoderated, which
>> seems appropriate for sage-flame.
>
> I hope it will not be spammed. If the sympy list was not moderated,
> it'd be full of spam already.
Good point. That usually only happens after a list has been around
a while and ha
Hi Lucio,
Not on vmware. Burned a CD and am running it on an x86 laptop.
I'll experiment some more this afternoon or evening and report back.
Rob
On May 8, 12:34 am, Lucio Lastra wrote:
> Update:
>
> Rob, are you running sagelwlcd on vmware?
>
> I found some information about "line 198" in
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:58 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Brian Granger
>>> wrote:
Most of all, everyone, please go read the damn GPL!
>>
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Brian Granger
>> wrote:
>>> Most of all, everyone, please go read the damn GPL!
>>>
>>> Brian
>>
>> Though very interesting to me personally, this
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed... but the OP claimed that a jpeg couldn't be a derived work of
>>> gimp because it's not a C++ program, which is a non sequitur.
>>
>> Do you actually think a JPEG is a de
On May 6, 10:05 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I think it depends on the context
Yeahr, I think so too, and that's the reason why i think we will never
get an answer based on technical facts and we could discuss forever on
this subject. The jurisdictional system isn't only based on technical
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Kwankyu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This works:
>
> sage: R.=PolynomialRing(QQ,2)
> sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
> sage: a.polynomial(x)
> x^2 + y*x + y
>
> But this does not work:
>
> sage: R.=PolynomialRing(GF(5),2)
> sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
> sage: a.polynomial(x)
> Traceback (most recen
Hi,
This works:
sage: R.=PolynomialRing(QQ,2)
sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
sage: a.polynomial(x)
x^2 + y*x + y
But this does not work:
sage: R.=PolynomialRing(GF(5),2)
sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
sage: a.polynomial(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: 'tuple' object cannot be interpreted as an inde
2009/5/7 Robert Bradshaw :
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 2:15 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>> It is a documented feature -- look at the docstring which says
>>
>> def coefficient(self, degrees):
>> """
>> Return the coefficient of the variables with the degrees
>> specified in th
On May 7, 2009, at 4:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> On May 7, 2009, at 4:10 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've been doing a lot of work recent trying to get the new symbolics
>>> ready for Sage 4.0. With 4.0 due
Update:
Rob, are you running sagelwlcd on vmware?
I found some information about "line 198" in here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/f90e2df58cdf5495
but seems to be related only when running sagelwlcd under vmware on Windows
XP.
Anyways, I strongly recommend to
27 matches
Mail list logo
