On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi Kiran,
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Kiran Kedlaya wrote:
>>
>> On 64-bit Fedora 10, I get a build failure in cliquer. The relevant
>> snippet from the install log is below.
>>
>> This looks like a case of 32/64 confusion, which I
On 2009-Aug-13 18:15:58 +1000, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>comments and emails, I've learnt many valuable tips. One in particular
>is to avoid Bashism in shell scripts so as to make one's shell scripts
>more portable to other platforms. This has made me more aware of
>non-portable features I use my shell
I untar'd the pari-2.3.4.p1.spkg, changed the -O3 to -O in
MACHINES and config/get_cc, retarred it into original name
and put it in with the spkg directory.
Then I just did the usual 'make' and Sage built and tested
fine on Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala. The pari folks just say
its probably a bug in
Dear sage-devel, dear group theorists,
at ticket #6750, I propose an upgrade of our optional spkg that can
compute modular cohomology rings of finite p-groups, ready for review.
As a new feature, the package provides Massey products. This is a
structure on cohomology rings that goes beyond the r
Hi,
I followed the docstring here:
http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html#sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.match
$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 |
| Typ
Kiran Kedlaya wrote:
> On 64-bit Fedora 10, I get a build failure in cliquer. The relevant
> snippet from the install log is below.
>
> This looks like a case of 32/64 confusion, which I am no stranger to.
> This machine runs on a primarily 32-bit network, and in the past we've
> discovered vario
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I answered an email from a French student here at my university,
> and I (naturally) suggested using Sage. I included some helpful links,
> and I couldn't find any of the French documentation on the website. Am I
> miss
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hmmm And how does one writes into the Sage Tutorial ? I have been
> willing to write a bit about graphs for a while, and it would be a
> good idea to document LP there...
Modify the files in here:
SAGE_ROOT/sage/devel/sage/doc/en
Hi Kiran,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Kiran Kedlaya wrote:
>
> On 64-bit Fedora 10, I get a build failure in cliquer. The relevant
> snippet from the install log is below.
>
> This looks like a case of 32/64 confusion, which I am no stranger to.
> This machine runs on a primarily 32-bit netw
No brainer.
+1
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/s
On 64-bit Fedora 10, I get a build failure in cliquer. The relevant
snippet from the install log is below.
This looks like a case of 32/64 confusion, which I am no stranger to.
This machine runs on a primarily 32-bit network, and in the past we've
discovered various build problems due to this. Fo
On 2009-08-14 11:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On 2009-08-14 01:42 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Robert
>>> Bradshawwrote:
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2009-08-14 01:42 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Robert
>> Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, William Stein
wrote:
Hi folks,
This is a source release of Sage 4.1.1.
Sage 4.1.1 was released on August 14, 2009. It is available at
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Sage is developed by volunteers and combines over 90 open source packages.
It is available f
Hmmm And how does one writes into the Sage Tutorial ? I have been
willing to write a bit about graphs for a while, and it would be a
good idea to document LP there...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
It's now put somewhere else, namely in
$HOME/.sage/temp/(hostname)/(pid)/ but the tutorial has not changed to
reflect this.
John
2009/8/14 brettpim :
>
> One more:
>
> I am sunning sage in ~/Projects/SAGE/sage-4.1 which is the root of the
> source tarball. as per
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/t
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Peter
>> Jeremy wrote:
>>> On 2009-Aug-11 15:29:29 -0700, William Stein wrote:
I just wanted to let people know that David Ackerman -- a UW student who
took my course on
Hi Nathann,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Knapsack ( it seems Sage only solves some special cases for the
> moment )
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knapsack_problem
This is on my todo list. See this sage-devel thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse
On Aug 13, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Robert
> Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, William Stein
>>> wrote:
I'm just curious. Why does the PSF reject BSD-licensed co
One more:
I am sunning sage in ~/Projects/SAGE/sage-4.1 which is the root of the
source tarball. as per
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/programming.html#loading-and-attaching-sage-files,
I created 'example.sage' in this directory and loaded and attached
it. contrary to the tutorial, no fil
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hello everybody !!!
>
> Now that the basics of Linear Programming are written, I am looking
> for ways to make it useful in Sage : I have been looking for
> Optimization/Graph algorithms which could be implemented this way and
> came up wit
Hello everybody !!!
Now that the basics of Linear Programming are written, I am looking
for ways to make it useful in Sage : I have been looking for
Optimization/Graph algorithms which could be implemented this way and
came up with the following ones :
Bin packing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi
I compiled 4.1.1.rc2 which did fine and then ran all doctests. It's a
HP 2140 dual core atom, 2gb ram, ubuntu 9.04 netbook remix.
The following doctests failed:
File "/home/harri/sage/sage-4.1.1.rc2/devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx",
line 1000:
sage: d = {u: 3, v: 5}; d.values()
Expec
Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> With #1-4 in place for locally-running Sage, I'd hope the Notebook
> would still have the capacity to render some text cells in html (from
> latex), leave others in plain latex text, and of course letting non-
> Latex users retain FCKeditor.
I feel obligated to point out t
Thanks Dr Stein, your ideas bring into focus what I was trying to
address.
> With 1-4 above, I could typeset 100% correctly absolutely any latex
> document with no funny business, but would have Sage I/O nicely
> integrated in the document. I could chose to ignore the pdf preview,
> or look at
2009/8/14 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> On 64-bit ubuntu I get this (sometimes):
>>
>> j...@ubuntu:~/sage-4.1.1.rc2$ ./sage -t
>> "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
>> *
Hi John,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 64-bit ubuntu I get this (sometimes):
>
> j...@ubuntu:~/sage-4.1.1.rc2$ ./sage -t
> "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
> ***
On 64-bit ubuntu I get this (sometimes):
j...@ubuntu:~/sage-4.1.1.rc2$ ./sage -t
"devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
**
File "/home/jec/sage-4.1.1.rc2/devel/sage/sage/symbo
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Peter
> Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2009-Aug-11 15:29:29 -0700, William Stein wrote:
>>> I just wanted to let people know that David Ackerman -- a UW student who
>>> took my course on Sage last quarter -- is working (funded by NSF) on
>>> creating a
Hi!
I use PIL for a long time.
It is good documented and feels Pythonic.
It is pure fun.
+1
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@
On Aug 13, 6:19 pm, William Stein wrote:
> You should include this with sage. You could make it
>
> SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-progress
Yes, sounds good to me. I just have to tweak it further to be really
useful and more intelligent.
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To p
31 matches
Mail list logo
