On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Kevin Stueve wrote:
> Which is preferable, writing a sage library in C and making it
> available to sage with Cython or writing it completely in Cython?
1. If you write it in C and make it available via Cython, then it
could potentially be used by other programs.
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
>
> but is there a .spkg file to test it with?
The ticket says:
"The SPKG is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/spkgs/polybori-0.6.spkg";
>>> Yes, but that link was posted 3 months a
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Sage has libgcrypt version 1.4.3 in spkg/standard.
>
> But:
>
> http://directory.fsf.org/project/libgcrypt/
>
> clearly shows:
>
> 1.4.3
>
> * Released: 21 Nov, 2008
> * Code Maturity: Stable
> * Source Archive: http://www.gnupg.org/download/index.en.html
> > If I have understood this correctly, and the suggestion is to use
> > Buchberger's algorithm to compute Grobner bases in Sage's symbolic
> > ring, which includes limited precision floating point numbers
>
> This is not what William meant (well, I think :). You can compute in the
> symbolic rin
Sage has libgcrypt version 1.4.3 in spkg/standard.
But:
http://directory.fsf.org/project/libgcrypt/
clearly shows:
1.4.3
* Released: 21 Nov, 2008
* Code Maturity: Stable
* Source Archive: http://www.gnupg.org/download/index.en.html#lib...
* Licenses: GPLv3
* Interface
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Saturday 15 August 2009, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
>>
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>
On Saturday 15 August 2009, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
>
> Kirkby wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
> >>
> >> Kirkby wrote:
> >>> William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just releas
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When upgrading from Sage 4.0 to version 4.1.1, I got the following error:
Here is the same error with upgrading from Sage 4.0.1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/scratch/mvngu/sandbox/sage-4.0.2/devel/sage/doc/commo
Hi folks,
When upgrading from Sage 4.0 to version 4.1.1, I got the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/scratch/mvngu/sandbox/sage-4.0/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py",
line 667, in
getattr(get_builder(name), type)()
File "/scratch/mvngu/sandbox/sage-4.0/devel/sag
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 10:26 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> what am I doing wrong?
>>
>
> don't know, i copy/pasted it in 4.1.1.rc2
>
> sage: sage: var('x,y,z,a,b,c,d,e,f')
> (x, y, z, a, b, c, d, e, f)
> sage: (x, y, z, a, b, c, d, e, f)
> (x, y, z, a,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-devel,
Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
patches. Spend a few
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>>
>>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>>
>>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>>
>> and revi
William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>
> and review 1 ticket.
>
> -- William
>
>
>
I'd take a look at
http://
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sag
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>
> and review 1 ticket.
I gave http://trac.s
Hi Sage-devel,
Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
and review 1 ticket.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washing
I am pleased to learn that deficiencies in gmpy are not inherited by
Sage, and that
MPIR, equivalent functionally to GMP is accessible more directly.
It doesn't seem that it should be a point of pride that there are 5000
lines in Sage that include mpz_ ...
(e.g. mpz_addmul(a,b,c) computes a=a+b
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed the following thread from the Maxima mailing list.
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Richard Fateman
> Date: Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [Maxima]
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>> I notice this when installing sage.
>>>
>>>
>>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/README.txt
>>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-crap
>>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-test-import
>>> Finished extraction
>>> *
2009/8/15 rjf :
>
> wow, I post one place and it comes out in two places...
>
> Here is an amplification about the comments on GMP and GMPY.
>
> From the perspective of Sage and python, I just took a look at the
> current gmpy.
> The documentation, which has not apparently been updated since 2003
wow, I post one place and it comes out in two places...
Here is an amplification about the comments on GMP and GMPY.
>From the perspective of Sage and python, I just took a look at the
current gmpy.
The documentation, which has not apparently been updated since 2003,
says
"Early tests have sho
Hi William,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I keep getting the following warning when loading the system-wide Sage
>> 4.1.1 on sage.math:
>
> This was caused by "sage -upgrade" being broken. I'm f
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Excellent.
>
> I will try to do that quickly ! ;-)
> By the way, were you writing about tutorials for the functions I
> mentionned or for the use of linear programming in Sage ?
The use of linear programming in Sage. The tutorial is suppo
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I keep getting the following warning when loading the system-wide Sage
> 4.1.1 on sage.math:
This was caused by "sage -upgrade" being broken. I'm fixing it.
>
> [mv...@sage ~]$ sage
> -
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> I notice this when installing sage.
>>
>>
>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/README.txt
>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-crap
>> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-test-import
>> Finished extraction
>> *
Hi,
There are actually three real test failures on OS X 10.5 PPC. They
both probably involve rounding issues. The second is harmless. The
first and third look serious.They are now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6753
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6754
http://trac.sag
Hi folks,
I noticed the following thread from the Maxima mailing list.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Fateman
Date: Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Maxima] mpmath + sage + hypergeometric numerics
To: Barton Willis
Cc: Maxima List
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I notice this when installing sage.
>
>
> sage_scripts-4.1.1/README.txt
> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-crap
> sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-test-import
> Finished extraction
>
> Host system
> uname -a:
> SunOS smudge 5.10 Gener
I notice this when installing sage.
sage_scripts-4.1.1/README.txt
sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-crap
sage_scripts-4.1.1/sage-test-import
Finished extraction
Host system
uname -a:
SunOS smudge 5.10 Generic_139555-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
*
Hi Brett,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:07 AM, brettpim wrote:
>
> One more:
>
> I am sunning sage in ~/Projects/SAGE/sage-4.1 which is the root of the
> source tarball. as per
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/programming.html#loading-and-attaching-sage-files,
> I created 'example.sage' in thi
Hi folks,
I keep getting the following warning when loading the system-wide Sage
4.1.1 on sage.math:
[mv...@sage ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.1.1, Release Date: 2009-08-14 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, a
Hi William,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
> The problem is that Sage is building the library but the cliquer spkg
> wasn't installed.
>
> This is because sage-4.1.1.spkg is installed *before* cliquer. This
> makes no sense, because spkg/standard/deps file has the cliq
Excellent.
I will try to do that quickly ! ;-)
By the way, were you writing about tutorials for the functions I
mentionned or for the use of linear programming in Sage ?
I sent a patch yesterday for Knapsack, and ISR/Bin Packing are written
already. I will send a patch for them as soon as I will
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> Juanjo,
>>
>> the main ECL developer has made new source release in the last 24 hours.
>> I've created a new ECL spkg. You can find it in the directory:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirk
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Today I answered an email from a French student here at my university,
>> and I (naturally) suggested using Sage. I included some helpful links,
>> and I couldn't find any of the French documentati
On Aug 14, 10:26 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> what am I doing wrong?
>
don't know, i copy/pasted it in 4.1.1.rc2
sage: sage: var('x,y,z,a,b,c,d,e,f')
(x, y, z, a, b, c, d, e, f)
sage: (x, y, z, a, b, c, d, e, f)
(x, y, z, a, b, c, d, e, f)
sage: sage: w0 = SR.wild(0); w1 = SR.wild(1); w2 = SR.wil
37 matches
Mail list logo
