On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> I need a convenient matrix class for some numerical work. SciPy doesn't
>>> accept GPL code and besides I heavily dislike the NumPy matrix cla
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> I need a convenient matrix class for some numerical work. SciPy doesn't
>> accept GPL code and besides I heavily dislike the NumPy matrix class. So
>> why not put my efforts into improving Sage (or at least wr
I need help integrating a Python/Cython program (calculation/
simulation) with Java (GUI front-end with Swing, mouselistener,
animating graphics). If anyone has experience integrating different
languages with Sage and the notebook, experience combining Python (and
Cython/C) with other languages, o
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:56:02 William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:57 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:14:56 roelof wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Im trying to make Sage working on a gentoo box but it fails here :
> >>
> >> Thread model: posix
> >> gcc version 4.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Hi Jason !
>
>> The patch is already done and waiting on trac for several months:
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1918
>
> Excellent !
>
>> You just have to update a bunch of doctests and review the patch!
>
> I was rea
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> I need a convenient matrix class for some numerical work. SciPy doesn't
> accept GPL code and besides I heavily dislike the NumPy matrix class. So
> why not put my efforts into improving Sage (or at least write something
> Sage-compati
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Ben Goodrich wrote:
> On Nov 27, 12:50 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> I wonder what Gentoo, Debian, etc., do? Do they do anything, or just
>> leave the output
>> of logging to the user.
>>
>> William
>
> Do you mean this?
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=s
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:57 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:14:56 roelof wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Im trying to make Sage working on a gentoo box but it fails here :
>>
>> Thread model: posix
>> gcc version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
>>
On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> kstueve wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 25, 12:34 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> wrote:
>>> It would appear to me that it would be very easy for a "script
>>> kiddie" to write
>>> a a program which created huge numbers of accounts on a Sage
>>> server, pe
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> The Sun equivalent of -fPIC, is usually -KPIC, though I think that is
> different
> on 64-bit platforms. It is also different on other platforms too.
Of course, any modern Sun is 64-bit.
What I mean is that I believe the correct flag to produce position independent
c
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:50:37 William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> > Part of the outline at
> >
> > http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageTasks
> >
> > is about build logs:
> >
> >* Separate file for each spkg for parallel builds.
> >* Group by install, upgra
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:14:56 roelof wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Im trying to make Sage working on a gentoo box but it fails here :
>
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
>
> checking build system type... k8-unknown-
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Dear Dave,
Hi Alexander
> thank you, for pointing out that this issue is not resolved in Sage. I
> thought, these things were resolved, because we were discussing similar
> issues within another thread.
The previous issue observed in Sage with PolyBoRi picking up the wr
On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:22 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 26, 10:13 pm, Christopher Olah
> wrote:
>> That's awesome.
>
> Thanks ;)
>
> The 16x16 one looks ugly, but that's no wonder. But the svg one and
> since I know they are maybe a bit larger, I also thought about some
> additional tweaks
On Nov 27, 12:50 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I wonder what Gentoo, Debian, etc., do? Do they do anything, or just
> leave the output
> of logging to the user.
>
> William
Do you mean this?
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goog
The next version of CVXOPT will include our own library for
computations
with chordal matrices - including multifrontal Cholesky
factorizations.
http://abel.ee.ucla.edu/chompack/
We did not develop the library primarily for the Cholesky
routines, but they seem to be competitive with CHOLMOD, and
Hi Jason !
> The patch is already done and waiting on trac for several months:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1918
Excellent !
> You just have to update a bunch of doctests and review the patch!
I was ready to do that, unfortunately, that not the problem here. There seems
Hello,
Im trying to make Sage working on a gentoo box but it fails here :
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
checking build system type... k8-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... k8-unknown-linux-gnu
My colleague discovered that the plain hard disk read speed was very low
due to a configuration problem. This has sped up the transmission a lot!
We'll test the system the next day a lot of students log in at once and
report back.
So you were right, Jan, the server was the place to look. You've cl
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> Part of the outline at
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageTasks
>
> is about build logs:
>
> * Separate file for each spkg for parallel builds.
> * Group by install, upgrade, or spkg install event.
> * Remotely aggregate and display ref
We have never had success in contacting Komei Fukuda, who should be
the official contact for cddlib. I don't understand why he has never
responded. He did just update his ETH webpage, so perhaps its worth
trying again (I think he may have had a visiting position somewhere
for a while, but I'm not
Hi
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:01:51AM -0800, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 27, 8:51 am, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > Recently it had problems when 50 users were already on and then
> > a group of 54 students walked into a lab and logged on simutlaneously
> > to start sage.
>
> Well, it still might
On Nov 27, 8:51 am, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Recently it had problems when 50 users were already on and then
> a group of 54 students walked into a lab and logged on simutlaneously
> to start sage.
Well, it still might be interesting to check what sage does in
the .sage dir. Does it read all files
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Is it with intention (i.e., are people supposed to manually download
> the spkg first, and then do sage -i), or is it a bug?
First, let's discuss what is (to me at least) the expected behaviour
when one issues the following comma
You can obtain "some" c_grah in Sage with
cG = G.copy(implementation="c_graph")
I don't know how far the development is though.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mo
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> I need a convenient matrix class for some numerical work. SciPy doesn't
> accept GPL code and besides I heavily dislike the NumPy matrix class. So
> why not put my efforts into improving Sage (or at least write something
> Sage-compatible for myself)...
>
> In part
I need a convenient matrix class for some numerical work. SciPy doesn't
accept GPL code and besides I heavily dislike the NumPy matrix class. So
why not put my efforts into improving Sage (or at least write something
Sage-compatible for myself)...
In particular I need to Cholesky-factor Hermiti
No answer to the main question, but just completing the timings:
sage: G=graphs.RandomGNP(300,.1)
sage: time d=[G.distance(i,j) for (i,j) in Subsets(G.vertices(),2)]
CPU times: user 3.67 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 3.67 s
Wall time: 3.72 s
sage: time d=networkx.all_pairs_shortest_path(G)
CPU times: use
Hello everybody !!!
Reviewing patch #7533, Rob Beezer noticed that the Graph function to
compute the distances between all the pairs of vertices in a Graph (
shortest_path_all_pairs(), written in Python ) is much slower than
computing independently the distances between all the pairs of
vertices i
Part of the outline at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageTasks
is about build logs:
* Separate file for each spkg for parallel builds.
* Group by install, upgrade, or spkg install event.
* Remotely aggregate and display refreshed statistics.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Implementations? Are
Part of the outline at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageTasks
is about build logs:
* Separate file for each spkg for parallel builds.
* Group by install, upgrade, or spkg install event.
* Remotely aggregate and display refreshed statistics.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Implementations? Are
There are a couple of issues with gnutls-2.2.1 which I reported to the
gnutls-de...@gnu.org mailing list. They advise me that we should not be using
2.2.1, as there are security issues with this release. I've made fixing the
security issues a ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7542
I've found a couple of relatively minor issues in cddlib-094f, which need
reporting upstream.
* cddlib 094f fails to build with Sun Studio - fabs() unresolved. Probably
needs -lm
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7067
* On HP-UX I had problems building mpfr, but just kept trying o
kstueve wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 12:34 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>> It would appear to me that it would be very easy for a "script kiddie" to
>> write
>> a a program which created huge numbers of accounts on a Sage server, perform
>> some CPU intensive computation on them, and bring the syste
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:42:01PM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
> We've been told non-US institutions are possible. Obviously, for
> logistical reasons, and given the nature of our possible funding,
> we'll probably favor places in the US that are close to one or more of
> the main folks on the grant.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:42:35PM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Two things, mostly. The huge amount of code that wasn't being
> merged -- that appears to now be merged :)
For a good part, that was just an instance of a general issue with
Sage's slow review process (and I don't have good suggest
Hi!
When David Joyner tried to install my group cohomology spkg in
sage-4.3.alpha0, the package was not downloaded. He reported:
jeeves:sage-4.3.alpha0 wdj$ ./sage -i
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/Cohomology/p_group_cohomology-1.2.spkg
Installing
http://sage.math.washington.edu/
On Nov 25, 12:34 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> It would appear to me that it would be very easy for a "script kiddie" to
> write
> a a program which created huge numbers of accounts on a Sage server, perform
> some CPU intensive computation on them, and bring the system to a near
> standstill
38 matches
Mail list logo
