Re: [sage-devel] Re: Graphical Physics Program Suggestions

2009-11-28 Thread Pat LeSmithe
On 11/28/2009 01:14 PM, kstueve wrote: > inkscape. Pyparsing seems to meet my needs. This is a third party Pyparsing is already part of the Sage distribution: sage: from matplotlib import pyparsing -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] G.vertices() and G.vertex_iterator()

2009-11-28 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, > I am writing something about chordal graphs and spent some time > finding a bug in my code caused by the fact that g.vertices() and > list(g.vertex_iterator()) return different lists I actually wanted > to find the list matching the adjacency matrix, but everything was > messed upi be

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Development Prize - could be misleading.

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
David Joyner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >> Perhaps it's me, but reading >> >> http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html >> >> I believe someone could easily get the impression that Michael Hansen was >> 'runner up' with 'second prize' and Michael Absho

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Development Prize - could be misleading.

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
David Joyner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >> Perhaps it's me, but reading >> >> http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html >> >> I believe someone could easily get the impression that Michael Hansen was >> 'runner up' with 'second prize' and Michael Absho

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Development Prize - could be misleading.

2009-11-28 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Perhaps it's me, but reading > > http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html > > I believe someone could easily get the impression that Michael Hansen was > 'runner up' with 'second prize' and Michael Abshof was the winner with 'first

[sage-devel] Sage Development Prize - could be misleading.

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Perhaps it's me, but reading http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html I believe someone could easily get the impression that Michael Hansen was 'runner up' with 'second prize' and Michael Abshof was the winner with 'first prize' I think the 1st and 2nd should be dropped, and just have 20

Re: [sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> William Stein wrote: >> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That appears to be gfortran. >>>

Re: [sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > William Stein wrote: > >>> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable >>> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That >>> appears to be gfortran. >> No it doesn't. sage_fortran is a script (or link?) created by th

Re: [sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > William Stein wrote: > >>> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable >>> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That >>> appears to be gfortran. >> >> No it doesn't.  sage_fortran

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Florent Hivert wrote: >> I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it. >> >> Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner, >> meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike, >> myself, for a better 24/24 7/7

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread Florent Hivert
> I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it. > > Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner, > meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike, > myself, for a better 24/24 7/7 service? Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladi

Re: [sage-devel] STL support (3d Printing!)

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: > Greetings! > > I've implemented a function to export a sage surface as a stl file. > [1] This allows for them to be printed with rep-rap and cupcake (two > open-source 3d printers) using the tool chain: stl file -> skeinforge > -> gcode fi

Re: [sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: >> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable >> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That >> appears to be gfortran. > > No it doesn't. sage_fortran is a script (or link?) created by the > spkg-install for the fort

[sage-devel] STL support (3d Printing!)

2009-11-28 Thread Christopher Olah
Greetings! I've implemented a function to export a sage surface as a stl file. [1] This allows for them to be printed with rep-rap and cupcake (two open-source 3d printers) using the tool chain: stl file -> skeinforge -> gcode file -> replicatorg (prints) . (I cant test it because the printer at h

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Printing...

2009-11-28 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi William Cauchois > Original author of the patch here. I took some time to look at this > today and found that the doctesting bug was due to reading the value > of sys.stdout only once in install(); during doctesting, sys.stdout is > reset some time after install() is called, presumably to

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > William Stein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each.  It's possible that >> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.  If anybody would >> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc.

[sage-devel] Is GCC 4.3.3 the most stable gcc ? Several think so

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Several people having been using my HP-UX box recently - mainly the mpfr developers (Vincent Lefevre, Paul Zimmermann), but also Dennis Clarke too. There seems to be a general Vincent and Dennis that gcc 4.3.3 is the most stable gcc. This is nothing to do with stability on HP-UX, but of gcc in

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that > many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would > like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just > respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what

Re: [sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > William said a week or so ago > > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/b4cf0f10ed040d5d?hl=en > > that "I think in sage-4.3 on, we should *only* include fortran compilers for > OS X, and *nothing* else." > > If that is the case, a

[sage-devel] Re: Printing...

2009-11-28 Thread William Cauchois
Hi, Original author of the patch here. I took some time to look at this today and found that the doctesting bug was due to reading the value of sys.stdout only once in install(); during doctesting, sys.stdout is reset some time after install() is called, presumably to redirect output back to the d

[sage-devel] G.vertices() and G.vertex_iterator()

2009-11-28 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello !! I am writing something about chordal graphs and spent some time finding a bug in my code caused by the fact that g.vertices() and list(g.vertex_iterator()) return different lists I actually wanted to find the list matching the adjacency matrix, but everything was messed upi because of

[sage-devel] fortran-20071120.p9/ sage_fortran / lapack / SAGE_FORTRAN

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William said a week or so ago http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/b4cf0f10ed040d5d?hl=en that "I think in sage-4.3 on, we should *only* include fortran compilers for OS X, and *nothing* else." If that is the case, a new package will be needed that removes the other binaries. I looked

[sage-devel] Re: Graphical Physics Program Suggestions

2009-11-28 Thread kstueve
I have another question. I need a parser for the d attribute of the path element of svg (scalable vector graphics). I want my physics program to be able import shapes drawn with an svg designer such as inkscape. Pyparsing seems to meet my needs. This is a third party python library. If I use P

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Polybori-discuss] Portability issue - GNU specific options sent to non-GNU compiler

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Alexander Dreyer wrote: > Dear Dave, > I'll try to find time to have a look at it. But unfortunately, Sun, in > particular the Sun-Compiler, is out of the scope of the projects, I'm > working on. So I cannot promise to fix it in the next days. Meanwhile, > you can have a look, how to teach the Sun

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Tom Boothby wrote: > While I certainly don't mind owning the notebook, I don't think I > contribute 1% of the effort these days.  I do like getting cc'd on it > all, though. > I've taken over ownership of the notebook component. William -- To post to this grou

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread Tom Boothby
While I certainly don't mind owning the notebook, I don't think I contribute 1% of the effort these days. I do like getting cc'd on it all, though. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@goog

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:56:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote: >>    Hi, >> >>    Here are the trac components with who "owns" each.  It's possible that >>    many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.  If anybody would like >>  

[sage-devel] Re: [Polybori-discuss] Portability issue - GNU specific options sent to non-GNU compiler

2009-11-28 Thread Alexander Dreyer
Dear Dave, > The previous issue observed in Sage with PolyBoRi picking up the wrong > compiler (Sun's C++ compiler instead of gcc) is resolved. PolyBoRi is > now using whatever CC and CXX are set too, which is good news. > > But PolyBoRi will not build with Sun's compiler. There seems to be a few

Re: [sage-devel] trac component ownership

2009-11-28 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:56:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote: >Hi, > >Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that >many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like >to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just res

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Denial of Service attack on Sage servers

2009-11-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Is the MSc project available online? I'd be interested to read it if possible. > Though you might think it more appropriate to not make it public, until issues > highlighted have been resolved. The MSc project in question wa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 4.2.1 on 64bit mac 10.6.2 and the plot function crashes

2009-11-28 Thread Aivo Jürgenson
On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Aivo Jürgenson wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 6:30 pm, William Stein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As a test, can you guys try putting the file >> >> http://wstein.org/home/wstein/tmp/fontList.cache >> >> in your $HOME/.matplotlib directory? > > The command line still

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Denial of Service attack on Sage servers

2009-11-28 Thread Pat LeSmithe
On 11/28/2009 02:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Nov 28, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> Actually, someone did a Masters project on just this. >> Is the MSc project available online? I'd be interested to read it if Paper: http://www.gingerlime.com/20090901_securing_sage_noteboo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Denial of Service attack on Sage servers

2009-11-28 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 28, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> On Solaris one can block outgoing ports in a zone, without affecting >>> the rest of >>> the machine. In fact, if someone gets root access in a zone, they >>> c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Denial of Service attack on Sage servers

2009-11-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> On Solaris one can block outgoing ports in a zone, without affecting >> the rest of >> the machine. In fact, if someone gets root access in a zone, they >> can do no >> damage elsewhere. >> >> I know one of the BSD

[sage-devel] Re: Sparse numerical matrices

2009-11-28 Thread dahl.joac...@gmail.com
I CVXOPT, the arguments for cvxopt.spmatrix() can also be CVXOPT nx1 dense matrices, i.e., you don't have to create Python lists, although that overhead is probably not too severe. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email