Re: [sage-devel] Re: implementation of some algorithm that i have implemented it in maple

2009-12-16 Thread Nick Alexander
On 16-Dec-09, at 5:05 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: >> Hasan Noori wrote: >>> dear sage-devel, >>> i'm a master student of mathematic in filed of Groebner basis >>> i'm coding in maple, >>> and have many algorithm implementation around Groe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linking libraries - do we need a completely different approach ?

2009-12-16 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:45:36 Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > This is not simply a run-time issue, as the conflicts are causing a failure > of Sage to build on OpenSolaris. > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7387 > > I'm not convinced renaming the libraries would solve it - as you say, it >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linking libraries - do we need a completely different approach ?

2009-12-16 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
François Bissey wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:46:40 Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> I was wondering if something could be done with version numbers of >> libraries, or perhaps all libraries are built with the name 'sage' at the >> front, so there is libsagereadline for example. But I suspect that i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linking libraries - do we need a completely different approach ?

2009-12-16 Thread François Bissey
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:46:40 Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I was wondering if something could be done with version numbers of > libraries, or perhaps all libraries are built with the name 'sage' at the > front, so there is libsagereadline for example. But I suspect that is the > name of the functio

Re: [sage-devel] input: and output: in docstrings

2009-12-16 Thread David Roe
I've updated the sage-coverage script, and one of the new features is the ability to determine input and output coverage. Here are some statistics: Current doctest coverage*: 80.0% Functions with valid INPUT specification**: 49.4% Functions with parameters completely described***: 46.8% Functions

Re: [sage-devel] Re: implementation of some algorithm that i have implemented it in maple

2009-12-16 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: > Hasan Noori wrote: >>   dear sage-devel, >>   i'm a master student of mathematic in filed of Groebner basis >>   i'm coding in maple, >>   and have many algorithm implementation around Groebner basis >>   such as FGLM,F4,univariate polynomial, B

Re: [sage-devel] Massive FLINT development update

2009-12-16 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Bill Hart wrote: > At Sage days 15 at the University of Washington, I spoke about FLINT > and how I soon hoped to open it up completely for contribution from > others. Since then an enormous amount of code has been contributed, > especially, Andy Novocin and Sebastian Pancratz and also by Burcin >

[sage-devel] Re: problems building R

2009-12-16 Thread Sebastian Pancratz
Dear all, Today I tried to build SAGE 4.2.1 from source and ran into what I think is the same problem as described by John Cremona in his original post. Namely, the build process failed when building R and the complaint was "`GCC_4.2.0' not found". Just in case it helps, the computer used is a l

[sage-devel] Re: implementation of some algorithm that i have implemented it in maple

2009-12-16 Thread Jaap Spies
Hasan Noori wrote: > dear sage-devel, > i'm a master student of mathematic in filed of Groebner basis > i'm coding in maple, > and have many algorithm implementation around Groebner basis > such as FGLM,F4,univariate polynomial, Buchberger with criteria, > Basis of quotient ring K[x_1,...

[sage-devel] Re: New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread Jason Grout
Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody !!! > > Robert Miller ( who is currently working hard on his thesis -- good > luck ! ) told me that GraphViz's licence had recently changed and may > now be Sage-compatible... This would be a great news for us, as > GraphViz is *THE* graph plotting tool that

Re: [sage-devel] problem using %timeit

2009-12-16 Thread Craig Citro
> OK, so there's a python (or ipython) source code file which causes > problems when running ipython on some machines.  Should that be > reported as a bug to the python people? > This could probably go upstream to IPython -- I've been meaning to do it once I sit down and figure out whether it's ju

[sage-devel] implementation of some algorithm that i have implemented it in maple

2009-12-16 Thread Hasan Noori
dear sage-devel, i'm a master student of mathematic in filed of Groebner basis i'm coding in maple, and have many algorithm implementation around Groebner basis such as FGLM,F4,univariate polynomial, Buchberger with criteria, Basis of quotient ring K[x_1,...,x_n]/I,... but i decided to coding

Re: [sage-devel] problem using %timeit

2009-12-16 Thread John Cremona
Thanks for the diagnosis! I tried the same thing on another machine and it worked fine. OK, so there's a python (or ipython) source code file which causes problems when running ipython on some machines. Should that be reported as a bug to the python people? John 2009/12/16 Craig Citro : >> Hi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Tom Boothby wrote: > Um, that's not a change. > > "This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of New York and > the intellectual property laws of the United States of America. No > party to this Agreement will bring a legal action under this Agreement > more than one year after the cause

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread Tom Boothby
Um, that's not a change. "This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of New York and the intellectual property laws of the United States of America. No party to this Agreement will bring a legal action under this Agreement more than one year after the cause of action arose. Each party wai

Re: [sage-devel] problem using %timeit

2009-12-16 Thread Craig Citro
> Hi John -- the offending character is the mu for microseconds. There are > probably classier fixes, but I edit the ipython source file in my sage > install. It's one of the ones in the traceback -- I'm on my phone and can't > look right now. > Line 1778 of $SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python2.6/site-pac

[sage-devel] Re: New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread YannLC
according to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html CPLv1.0 is GPL incompatible. On Dec 16, 8:51 pm, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Here is the license mentionned :http://www.graphviz.org/License.php > > Nathann -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscri

[sage-devel] Re: New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread Nathann Cohen
Here is the license mentionned : http://www.graphviz.org/License.php Nathann -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google

[sage-devel] New license for Graphviz

2009-12-16 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello everybody !!! Robert Miller ( who is currently working hard on his thesis -- good luck ! ) told me that GraphViz's licence had recently changed and may now be Sage-compatible... This would be a great news for us, as GraphViz is *THE* graph plotting tool that we need... Could anybody knowledg

Re: [sage-devel] Segmentation Fault in coerce_actions.c

2009-12-16 Thread David Roe
Any time writing in pure python causes a segfault is a serious bug. Glancing briefly at the code, I have a few ideas for what might have caused it: I'll take a more detailed look in an hour or two. Regardless of what's causing the crash, I'd suggest you use the methods described at http://www.sag

Re: [sage-devel] problem using %timeit

2009-12-16 Thread Craig Citro
Hi John -- the offending character is the mu for microseconds. There are probably classier fixes, but I edit the ipython source file in my sage install. It's one of the ones in the traceback -- I'm on my phone and can't look right now. -cc On Dec 16, 2009 10:36 AM, "John Cremona" wrote: I have

[sage-devel] problem using %timeit

2009-12-16 Thread John Cremona
I have defined a function in external .sage file which I load. Then I test it using %timeit. But an error is raised: UnicodeEncodeErrorTraceback (most recent call last) /home/jec/.sage/temp/selmer/11222/_home_jec_agm_sage_3.py in () /home/jec/sage-4.3.rc0/local/lib/pyth

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath down?

2009-12-16 Thread Tom Boothby
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:28 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Simon King wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Since a couple of hours I try to go to http://www.sagemath.org/, but >> it seems to be down. > > The virtual machine on which the sagemath page runs keeps crashing. > It's defin

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-users] first peak at update to Jmol in SAGE (3-D function plotting)...

2009-12-16 Thread jason-sage
I'm CCing this to sage-devel. For Sage-devel people, the full thread can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jmol-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/index.html (subject: [Jmol-users] first peak at update to Jmol in SAGE (3-D functionplotting)... The message I'm replying to specifically is

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath down?

2009-12-16 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > Since a couple of hours I try to go to http://www.sagemath.org/, but > it seems to be down. The virtual machine on which the sagemath page runs keeps crashing. It's definitely a bug in VirtualBox. I tried upgrading VirtualBox but that

[sage-devel] Segmentation Fault in coerce_actions.c

2009-12-16 Thread Daniel Bump
I will explain how to make sage have a segmentation fault with the following alarming message: Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occured in SAGE. This probably occured because a *compiled* component of SAGE has a bug in it (typica

[sage-devel] Re: MathJax: the next version of jsmath

2009-12-16 Thread kcrisman
Also, if you find some different bug, here is a link to the bug tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=261188&atid=1240827 On Dec 16, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > On Dec 16, 3:57 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > > > On 15 pro, 08:47, Jason Grout wrote: > > > > If you want to see a p

[sage-devel] Re: MathJax: the next version of jsmath

2009-12-16 Thread kcrisman
On Dec 16, 3:57 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > On 15 pro, 08:47, Jason Grout wrote: > > > If you want to see a preview of the MathJax, next version of jsmath, > > which Davide has been working on for a while, go to: > > >http://www.mathjax.com/?page_id=13 > > I have scattered tee in Firefox (2

[sage-devel] Re: Improving Sage <-> jmol interface (and 3d graphics in general)

2009-12-16 Thread mhampton
Wow, that looks great. I am very busy with end-of-semester stuff but hopefully I can get a little more involved next week. -Marshall On Dec 16, 3:50 am, Jason Grout wrote: > For anyone interested in working on 3d graphics, Jonathan Gutow has > posted a demo of his recent work on getting Sage to

[sage-devel] Thanksssssssssssss !!!!

2009-12-16 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello !!! I just wanted to to thank everybody here for their help in reviewing the Graph Theory patches, and especially Robert Miller for yesterday's work :-) Most of the LP patches will be avilable soon in Sage, and this is GREAT !! :-) Thank you all agan Nathann -- To p

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath down?

2009-12-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Simon, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Simon King wrote: > My aim is to find an appropriate bibtex entry for citing Sage. If you > have it handy, I'd appreciate if you could post it here. Here it is: @manual{Sage2009, key = {Sage}, author = {William Stein and others},

[sage-devel] sagemath down?

2009-12-16 Thread Simon King
Hi! Since a couple of hours I try to go to http://www.sagemath.org/, but it seems to be down. My aim is to find an appropriate bibtex entry for citing Sage. If you have it handy, I'd appreciate if you could post it here. Related question: I have some vague memories that Sage should be named in s

[sage-devel] Improving Sage <-> jmol interface (and 3d graphics in general)

2009-12-16 Thread Jason Grout
For anyone interested in working on 3d graphics, Jonathan Gutow has posted a demo of his recent work on getting Sage to play nicely with jmol. See http://groups.google.com/group/sage-notebook/browse_frm/thread/dfa3cb80d6c3793f where Jonathan discusses implementing 3d axes better, mesh lines

[sage-devel] Re: MathJax: the next version of jsmath

2009-12-16 Thread ma...@mendelu.cz
On 15 pro, 08:47, Jason Grout wrote: > If you want to see a preview of the MathJax, next version of jsmath, > which Davide has been working on for a while, go to: > > http://www.mathjax.com/?page_id=13 > I have scattered tee in Firefox (2.0) and very bad rendering in Opera (9.63) Do you have in M