On 2010-Jan-27 19:24:18 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>It does not seem unreasonable to check ones patches on Solaris, OS X and one
>linux distro. Of course it does not guarantee it will work on every linux
>distro, but it would have a reasonable probability of doing so.
What's needed is a
Hi folks,
At least with Sage 4.3.1, the build would fail when compiling the Sage
library. In Sage 4.3.2.alpha0, R is upgraded to version 2.10.1, which
requires iconv as documented in the R release note [1]. On t2.math,
the iconv library under /usr/include and /usr/lib is not sufficient
for getting
> One thing to keep in mind with that is that the joint meeting
> organizers definitely do not want people registering as exhibitors
> just to go to talks - that was made clear to me at the DC meeting in
> 2009.
And it seems that anybody off the street can easily go to a talk, but
they inspect b
On several occasions I've posted the results of my experiments
converting latex documents into Sage worksheets, and as a result have
had a few requests for the relevant scripts and configuration files.
I've now written some minimal instructions, a minimal example and a
template latex file, and put
On Jan 27, 8:53 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Gokhan,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
>
>
>
> > Could someone register me at the Trac? I am getting a bizarre error
> > there:
>
> Please send an email to William Stein, reporting the issue and/or
> request an account.
>
>
On Jan 27, 9:49 pm, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> On 01/27/2010 06:24 PM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
>
> > On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> >> Gokhan Sever wrote:
> > Could someone register me at the Trac? I am getting a bizarre error
> > there:
>
> Could you let us know the name and version of the bro
The usual convention in graph theory is that a Cayley graph does _not_
have to be connected.
For example it is a basic theorem due to Sabidussi that a graph X is a
Cayley graph for a group G if and
only if G acts regularly on the vertices of X. Since there does not
appear to be a significant cost
On 01/27/2010 06:24 PM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Gokhan Sever wrote:
> Could someone register me at the Trac? I am getting a bizarre error
> there:
Could you let us know the name and version of the browser and the URL
for the page with the error? Also, could
On Jan 27, 10:01 pm, mhampton wrote:
> Really? Maybe I'm confused but it seems the AMS special session
> deadline is April 1st:
>
> http://www.ams.org/amsmtgs/2125_request.html
>
> Not that far away, admittedly, but we would still have time.
>
Agreed, some. MAA deadline is long past.
- kcri
Really? Maybe I'm confused but it seems the AMS special session
deadline is April 1st:
http://www.ams.org/amsmtgs/2125_request.html
Not that far away, admittedly, but we would still have time.
Its not clear to me that it makes sense to do a session on sage-
related research - that seems simulta
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> export SAGE_CHECK="yes"
> # cd to SAGE_ROOT, i.e. the top-level Sage directory
> for spkg in `ls spkg/standard/ | grep '\.spkg'`; do
> ./sage -f "$spkg"
That line should be
./sage -f spkg/standard/"$spkg"
or something s
Hi Gokhan,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> Could someone register me at the Trac? I am getting a bizarre error
> there:
Please send an email to William Stein, reporting the issue and/or
request an account.
> Also what is the difference between running the test suite (
On Jan 27, 8:12 pm, mhampton wrote:
> > As Kiran and Karl-Dieter mention, it would be a great tie-in with an
> > AMS Short Course and the MAA PREP workshop.
>
> Yes, it would be good to have some other Sage-related events. Besides
> the AMS short course or MAA PREP workshop, maybe we could try
On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Gokhan Sever wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > uname -a
> > Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC
> > 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> > Getting many errors after ./sage -testall
>
> > --
Gokhan Sever wrote:
Hello,
uname -a
Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC
2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Getting many errors after ./sage -testall
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t "
> As Kiran and Karl-Dieter mention, it would be a great tie-in with an
> AMS Short Course and the MAA PREP workshop.
Yes, it would be good to have some other Sage-related events. Besides
the AMS short course or MAA PREP workshop, maybe we could try for a
sage-related special session?
> Maybe th
Hi Gokhan,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> Where can I post logs for the errors? Is it fine to post here or any
> alternative place better?
You can post test logs to sage-release. See
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release
Many people on sage-devel don't like t
> * Merges cayley_graph with that for FiniteSemigroups. In the
> merging, connecting_set was deprecated to generators. Also
> providing a single element by itself as connecting set is no
> more supported.
Why is connecting_set being deprecated? Why is a connecting set of
size 1 n
Hello,
uname -a
Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC
2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Getting many errors after ./sage -testall
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/module
In the Sage 4.3.1 interpreter, an attached file gets re-read
exactly two times when changed. Subsequent changes
(saved to disk, of course) do not trigger re-reading the file.
If within the same session I re-attach the file by issuing
attach , the file is reloaded again. Then, the
next change to th
Hello,
Let me advertise a patch on #8044 which introduces categories in the
group code and uses it to do some cleanup. There are some minor design
questions which I thought should be brought up here. This is a
followup to #7921, and I'd love to see it in 4.3.2.
Thanks in advance for feedb
Most packages in Sage have something to add -m64 on a 64-bit build (some only
for Darwin, or OS X, though we are gradually changing that.)
zlib is different, in that it has no such flag. One Solaris at least, it is
building 32-bit, and I assume on OS X too, as there is nothing to force a 64-bit
> > Strange. I reviewed a recent change from Nicolas in this file. What does it
> > says in verbose ?
> >
> > sage -t -verbose "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py"
> >
> > ???
>
>
> You asked for it!
[...]
Sure ! Now I know which command triggered the segfault:
> Trying:
> Intege
Marshall,
Thanks for starting so *early* on this. I'm still recovering from the
meetings that just ended.
I got the same feeling from people I met in San Francisco that a booth
would have been beneficial, so I think we shouldn't let another year
go by without doing this. The one direct question
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> jeeves:sage-4.3.2.alpha0 wdj$ ./sage -t
>> "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py"
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py"
>> A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
>> cr
I agree with everything Robert proposes (perhaps with some caveats) --
but perhaps sage-nt would be a more appropriate forum?
John
2010/1/27 Robert Miller :
> Hello,
>
> I recently discovered that the following command does not work:
>
> sage: EllipticCurve('390g1').quadratic_twist(-191).gens()
>
> It does not seem unreasonable to check ones patches on Solaris, OS X and one
> linux distro. Of course it does not guarantee it will work on every linux
> distro, but it would have a reasonable probability of doing so.
Perhaps if one has multiple terminals open just waiting to test things
all t
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris.
Nor do I. Or test every patch on all of Ubuntu, RedHat, Debian, OS X,
e
Hi,
> jeeves:sage-4.3.2.alpha0 wdj$ ./sage -t
> "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py"
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py"
> A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
> crashed doctest.
> [1.8 s]
Strange. I reviewed a recent
Hello,
I recently discovered that the following command does not work:
sage: EllipticCurve('390g1').quadratic_twist(-191).gens()
The reason is that Sage tries to find generators using mwrank, and the
height bounds Sage uses by default are set too low:
---
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris.
Nor do I. Or test every patch on all of Ubuntu, RedHat, Debian, OS X,
etc. (and soon Cygwin),
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:24 AM, kcrisman wrote:
I think it would be very useful in following up to the PREP workshop
as well. I think I can commit to staffing it for a significant period
of time, though I do not have a funding source. If 50 people each
committed $10 to t
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:24 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> I think it would be very useful in following up to the PREP workshop
> as well. I think I can commit to staffing it for a significant period
> of time, though I do not have a funding source. If 50 people each
> committed $10 to the Sage foundati
On 64-bit linux, built fine. Long tests revealed only one problem
(reported already I think) in
/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx # 6 doctests
failed (details below in [1]).
On 32-bit linux, built fine but 2 failures: [1] again and also
sage/libs/cremona/newforms.pyx (see [2
Installedfine on imac running 10.6.2. However, I got
The following tests failed:
sage -t
"devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/element_wrapper.py" # Segfault
Details:
jeeves:sage-4.3.2.alpha0 wdj$ ./sage -t
"
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris. Yet 't2' is
available for anyone to test their changes. That machine was supplied
free by Sun, who obviously want to see Sage running on Solaris.
For s
Hi Georg,
The bug you remembered is http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/3304, I
had not seen that report. I'll try to get it fixed now.
Volker
On Jan 27, 2:27 pm, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
> --- I consider the cddlib spkg example as another bug, and if I
> remember correctly, there already exis
Note this is only in line3d, not line2d. I think I can give this
positive review, assuming it doesn't break (fix?) a test somewhere.
- kcrisman
On Jan 27, 9:24 am, xtian wrote:
> There's a ticket related to the issue already:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6989
>
> I missed that
I think it would be very useful in following up to the PREP workshop
as well. I think I can commit to staffing it for a significant period
of time, though I do not have a funding source. If 50 people each
committed $10 to the Sage foundation for this purpose, that would get
us halfway there, thou
Thanks a lot. There is already a patch wich fixed the problem for me.
That was quick!
On 27 Jan., 11:11, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8092
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
> C-only libraries are ok. This bug must be some remnant of the build
> system, I don't have gcc installed under /usr/local (neither has the
> official Fedora 12).
>
> For example, $SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/libgmpxx.la contains:
>
> dependency_libs=' /home/vbraun/Sage/sage/local/lib/libgmp.la
> /usr/lo
There's a ticket related to the issue already:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6989
I missed that when searching for existing tickets.
Best regards, xtian
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-dev
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:35 AM, xtian wrote:
> Load this into a sage session and the type change will show.
Ticket #6989
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6989
tracks a similar (the same?) problem for line3d.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Just for the record,
On 27 Jan., 14:35, xtian wrote:
> If a list of vectors gets passed as an argument to
> sage.plot.line.line(), the entries' types are changed
> from 'vector' to 'tuple' by the call to the
> line() function.
> [...]
Environment info (including, but probably not limited to):
S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:35 AM, xtian wrote:
> Load this into a sage session and the type change will show.
This is what I get:
[mv...@sage mvngu]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.1, Release Date: 2010-01-20
If a list of vectors gets passed as an argument to sage.plot.line.line
(),
the entries' types are changed from 'vector' to 'tuple' by the call to
the
line() function. This results in failing vector operations on the list
entries
in subsequent calculations.
How to reproduce:
---snip---
class Foo:
> People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
> don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris. Yet 't2' is
> available for anyone to test their changes. That machine was supplied
> free by Sun, who obviously want to see Sage running on Solaris.
For some reason I have
Hi Mariha,
I'm not quite sure what you mean by compiler libraries; libstdc++.so
is installed in basically every unix and in the shared library search
path (save for embedded, perhaps). Even if you don't have a compiler
installed you pretty much need libstdc++.so or you can't run programs
that were
This would definitely be called for if the AMS approves William's
Short Course application. I can help with funding if needed.
Kiran
On Jan 26, 11:30 pm, mhampton wrote:
> Since this sort of decision should be made pretty early in the year I
> wanted to open a discussion on it.
>
> Sage has had
On 01/24/2010 02:21 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:06 AM, felix wrote:
>> in sage 4.3.1 ~/.sage/init.sage is not automatically attached in the
Thanks very much for reporting this problem, which is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8092
--
To post to this group,
On Jan 27, 6:10 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Just tried it, it builds on Linux x86 (Debian) and OSX 10.5 (PPC)
> Perhaps it makes sense to make a new ticket and invite testers here.
>
ok, maybe i made something wrong. i'll make a better spkg for 1.1.2
soon and will post it. and there is already
51 matches
Mail list logo
