As a further update for those interested, the above method works in
both binary windows (vmware) and linux versions. However, on Linux, an
easier method is to install sage from the binary, and then reinstall R
from source. This incidentally enables png, jpeg and X11 in R if the
required development
>
> In your opinion, is it better to leave the current behavior of including
> fpu.c on Itanium Linux systems, or just remove that since it will be safer?
>
>
Be a bit careful with the language here. If someone has an older
(pre-Montecito) Itanium, then from what I understand it is perfectly
plausi
> Upgraded from .rc1 which was in turn upgraded from .rc0, on Mac OS X,
> 10.5.8 (Dual Quad Xeon), w/o problems.
>
> One test failed (ptestlong):
> devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx
>
> 4 instances of "_imaging C module is not installed".
>
Try a search for "imaging C module not instal
Maurizio's function is pretty nice! It's exactly what I was looking
for. I think it should be included in future releases. But it's a bit
slow (at least for the 1..1e9 range), maybe it should be rewritten or
compiled.
The only thing I didn't like is that it saves the image to the current
directory,
On Aug 7, 2010, at 14:13 , Mitesh Patel wrote:
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails & posts, and build & test reports!
Source archive:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/hom
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
> contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
> troubleshooting, emails & posts, and build & test reports!
Thanks. I'm building binaries for the fo
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails & posts, and build & test reports!
Source archive:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.5.2/sage-4.5.2.tar
Upgrade path:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9705
exact traceback in ticket.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> When I paste the following code into a notebook worksheet in magma
> mode, I consistently get "Syntax Error". When I paste the same code
> directly into magma, it works properly:
>
> {{{
> _:=PolynomialRing(Rationals());
> repeat
> g:=3*b*x^4+1
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
>> > I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
>> > weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
>>
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> > I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
> > weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
> > sagemath working building the copies contained in the sag
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> > Kamaraju,
>> >
>> > Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
>> >
>> > I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
>> > is unlikely to attract many users and hence t
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Kamaraju,
> >
> > Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
> >
> > I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
> > is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
> > In addition, upstrea
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, slabbe wrote:
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> According to http://wiki.sagemath.org/Workshops the upcoming Sage
> workshops are :
>
> * Sage Days 25 -- Mumbai, India (August 9-12, 2010); funded by India
> * Sage Days 26 -- Kaiserslautern, Germany (August 27-31, 2010); funded
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:31 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau
>> wrote:
>>> The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
>>> to provide an easy way to input matrices.
>>
>> Speakin
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
> > the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
> > re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
> > (though it might be be
Hi sage-devel,
According to http://wiki.sagemath.org/Workshops the upcoming Sage
workshops are :
* Sage Days 25 -- Mumbai, India (August 9-12, 2010); funded by India
* Sage Days 26 -- Kaiserslautern, Germany (August 27-31, 2010); funded
by Germany
But according to http://wiki.sagemath.org/MyStar
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau
> wrote:
>> The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
>> to provide an easy way to input matrices.
>
> Speaking of syntax and matrices, let's not forget the seemingly
> biza
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:49PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 08/ 7/10 03:37 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
>
>>> From my experience, by far the most efficient way of writing cross-platform
>
> Who are you quoting?
I'm not quoting. Somewhere in the email chain the escaped "From " wasn't
On 08/ 7/10 03:37 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
From my experience, by far the most efficient way of writing cross-platform
code is being "reasonably" aware of the relevant standards, and then simply fix
any remaining issues as they pop up.
Please don't take this the wrong way, as I greatly
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> sympow seems to have presented some problems on Solaris 10 on x86. I've
> tried looking at this source code, and it makes little sense whatsoever
> to me.
>
>
> Anyway, that aside, lets get to the C source code.
>
> I tried to c
sympow seems to have presented some problems on Solaris 10 on x86. I've tried
looking at this source code, and it makes little sense whatsoever to me.
William has tried to clean up the 'Configure' script, though it's still very
messy, with things like
SH=`whichexe sh` && echo "#define SH \"$S
On 08/ 7/10 01:25 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
Yes, sorry for not providing email addresses. It is best to write to
the contact address on the MPIR webpage, or email me and I'll pass the
message on to the MPIR developers.
Of course if it is not confidential, please post directly to the MPIR
development
Yes, sorry for not providing email addresses. It is best to write to
the contact address on the MPIR webpage, or email me and I'll pass the
message on to the MPIR developers.
Of course if it is not confidential, please post directly to the MPIR
development list (in CC).
Thanks,
Bill.
On 7 Aug,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau wrote:
> The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
> to provide an easy way to input matrices.
Speaking of syntax and matrices, let's not forget the seemingly
bizarre behavior one gets when one does
sage: trace(M)
for a matrix
On Aug 3, 5:52 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> 6. TRANSPOSE/CONJUGATE
> >> It seems that implementing this would just involve modifying the
> >> __pos__(self) method for complexes, matrices and complex matrices, and
> >> I think that both conjugating and transposing are common enough
> >> operations t
26 matches
Mail list logo
