On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 at 09:12PM -0800, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> I have a doctest that results in a long (400-byte) string of output.
> Is there a simple way to tell the doctest code to ignore whitespace
> (in particular, newlines) when comparing output? I don't think putting
> that output in the fi
+1
On 17 December 2010 08:52, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Right now, CHomP is an experimental spkg for Sage. I propose that it
> be optional instead.
>
> Description: CHomP stands for "Computational Homology Project," and it
> is a collection of software for homology computation. It includes
> bot
Hi, all,
I have a doctest that results in a long (400-byte) string of output. Is there
a simple way to tell the doctest code to ignore whitespace (in particular,
newlines) when comparing output? I don't think putting that output in the file
is a reasonable thing to do, but I don't want to jum
I've given it positive review.
On Dec 17, 4:43 am, John Cremona wrote:
> Fancy reviewing some Sage?
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: John H Palmieri
> Date: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 PM
> Subject: [sage-devel] please help review #8442: Lie algebras in Sag
On Dec 16, 9:45 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have converted the whole reference manual use one page per method or
> function. The resulting HTML version of the reference manual is up [1]
> at Google code for your viewing pleasure. The script that I used in
> the conversion process is u
+1
On Thursday, December 16, 2010, mhampton wrote:
> +1
>
> I haven't had any trouble compiling CHomP on a variety of linux and OS
> X machines. It seems like high quality code that easily qualifies for
> optional status.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On Dec 16, 6:52 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> Right now
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Georg S. Weber
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 11:30 AM
To: sage-devel
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Should Sage include its own gcc ? It would add <= 1.6
MB to the Sage tarball.
P.S.:
Francois, I thought you were "on leave" moving to a
+1
I haven't had any trouble compiling CHomP on a variety of linux and OS
X machines. It seems like high quality code that easily qualifies for
optional status.
-Marshall
On Dec 16, 6:52 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Right now, CHomP is an experimental spkg for Sage. I propose that it
> be opt
Right now, CHomP is an experimental spkg for Sage. I propose that it
be optional instead.
Description: CHomP stands for "Computational Homology Project," and it
is a collection of software for homology computation. It includes
both command-line functions and a C++ library.
Note that it computes
On 16 Dez., 14:56, leif wrote:
> On 16 Dez., 13:11, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> > Gentoo-prefix uses rpath instead of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH kludge, very good!
> > But this also means that there won't be any binary distributions (even in
> > their current broken state) until we work out the rpath-rewr
>
> I think you really know what you're talking about. I agree with your
> remarks above, especially points 1 and 2 above, and your remarks about
> the difficulty of building GCC itself and having different coexisting
> GCC's at once are exactly right.
>
> Shall we start taking some genuine steps
For the record, PatchELF can grow an ELF executable to accommodate a larger
RPATH than what it was originally linked with.
But at least initially we should probably go with Leif's variable-rpath
option. By the time this works all distributions probably come with a
dloader that supports it ;-)
You can bootstrap gcc with Sun studio, say, but you cannot compile gcc with
another compiler. If gcc 4.0.1 did not bootstrap with Sun's compiler then it
was a regression and fixed in later versions.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Volker Braun
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 1:11 AM
To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Should Sage include its own gcc ? It would add <= 1.6
MB to the Sage tarball.
Gentoo-prefix uses rpath instead of the LD_L
Fancy reviewing some Sage?
John
-- Forwarded message --
From: John H Palmieri
Date: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 PM
Subject: [sage-devel] please help review #8442: Lie algebras in Sage
To: sage-devel
Ticket #8442 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8442) adds a
tutorial a
Hi Luis,
On 16 Dez., 20:12, luisfe wrote:
> What does it mean 'deprecation'? Will this mean that at some point
>
> sage: var('x')
> sage: QQ[x]
>
> will be invalid code?
I think it should be invalid code.
Or, at least PolynomialRing(QQ,[singular]) should be invalid.
Currently, it yields a polyn
On 16 Dez., 18:09, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 14 December 2010 05:30, leif wrote:
>
> > (Btw., I failed in trying to compile some older versions of GCC with
> > newer ones, e.g. 4.0.x with 4.3.3, 4.4.3 and 4.5.1.)
> > -Leif
>
> At one point one could build gcc with a C compiler. Then it became
> ne
On Dec 16, 6:32 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On 15 Dez., 15:39, Simon King wrote:
>
> > This is why I suggest the scenario "the ring constructor prints a
> > warning if the variable name is not a string": QQ[x] or
> > PolynomialRing(QQ,[singular],1) would result in a warning, but the
> > *
Hi folks,
Say I have a weighted graph G, but I now want G to be unweighted. So I
try using G.weighted(False) to toggle G to be unweighted. This doesn't
work as I expected, as demonstrated in the following transcript:
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.6.1.alpha3, Release Date: 2010-12-05'
sage: G =
Hi
I had ATLAS fail to build from sage-3.6 running Ubuntu 10.04.1
on an HP Probook 4515s with and AMD CPU (yesterday).
Due to time pressure I installed a prebuilt binary instead.
Sorry, no more info.
regards,
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^^
--
To p
Ignore what appears to be an empty message from me. I got a message
"Your message has been sent," but I don't recall pressing the "Send"
button.
On 21 November 2010 17:17, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In the Virtual box it SEEMS to be necessary to give the virtual
> machine
> more tha
On Dec 16, 2010, at 08:50 , Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 02:55 , Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> Works for me:
>>>
>>> sage: X=Integer(54)
>>> sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
>>> 7.3484692283495342945918522241
>>> sage: X=RDF('3
On 21 November 2010 17:17, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Update:
> Since my last update;
> The Atlas problem seemed to have been fixed with the atlas-3.8.3.p17
> spkg, however I ran into more trouble later with matplotlib-1.0.0
> and that sent me off on a course of enquiry that led me t
Hi all!
On 15 Dez., 15:39, Simon King wrote:
> This is why I suggest the scenario "the ring constructor prints a
> warning if the variable name is not a string": QQ[x] or
> PolynomialRing(QQ,[singular],1) would result in a warning, but the
> *intended* use QQ['x'] or R.=QQ[] would be OK.
I sugge
On 14 December 2010 05:30, leif wrote:
> (Btw., I failed in trying to compile some older versions of GCC with
> newer ones, e.g. 4.0.x with 4.3.3, 4.4.3 and 4.5.1.)
> -Leif
At one point one could build gcc with a C compiler. Then it became
necessary to use gcc to build gcc. Now as you say, you
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 02:55 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> Works for me:
>>
>> sage: X=Integer(54)
>> sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
>> 7.3484692283495342945918522241
>> sage: X=RDF('3.14')
>> sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
>> 1.7720045146669350752850780727
>
Hi folks,
I have converted the whole reference manual use one page per method or
function. The resulting HTML version of the reference manual is up [1]
at Google code for your viewing pleasure. The script that I used in
the conversion process is up at bitbucket [2], from where you should
also find
On Dec 16, 2010, at 02:55 , Volker Braun wrote:
> Works for me:
>
> sage: X=Integer(54)
> sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
> 7.3484692283495342945918522241
> sage: X=RDF('3.14')
> sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
> 1.7720045146669350752850780727
That works for me as well. After posting, I checked further, and fou
On 16 Dez., 13:11, Volker Braun wrote:
> Gentoo-prefix uses rpath instead of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH kludge, very good!
> But this also means that there won't be any binary distributions (even in
> their current broken state) until we work out the rpath-rewriting.
At least newer GNU / Linux loaders s
Right now, Sage does not follow PEP 263 [1] very well when looking for
encoding declarations in scripts. You could review #10440 and fix that:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10440
This affects things like SageTeX, in which we can't particularly
guarantee that the first line will ma
On 2010-12-15 21:25, leif wrote:
> I'm currently preparing a SageNB 0.8.9.p1 with the changes from #10176
> (patches only rebased w.r.t. the version number in setup.py) and some
> further minor additions.
>
> If this doesn't fix the issue, it should at least give error messages
> which allow to tr
I'm all in favor of splitting off the non-mathematical parts into sage-os. I
think Gentoo prefix is the most widely-used "hosted distribution" and
probably the way to go. Some observations:
Gentoo-prefix uses rpath instead of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH kludge, very good!
But this also means that there
Works for me:
sage: X=Integer(54)
sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
7.3484692283495342945918522241
sage: X=RDF('3.14')
sage: sqrt(X,prec=100)
1.7720045146669350752850780727
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+un
The command alarm(n) raises a KeyboardInterrupt after n seconds. Is
there a specific reason to raise *KeyboardInterrupt* and not a new
exception, say AlarmTimeout?
(slightly related: #9163, #9678)
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Thanks, Dima!
I have done so. I've also added a feature, a bugfix for it, and a
doctest for it. Here is the new patch:
http://www1.spms.ntu.edu.sg/~krkini/temp/sage-wlrefine.patch
Same URL, new file. If you would like to see the old patch, stick a
".old" on the end of the URL. Is this patch abou
35 matches
Mail list logo
