On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> Hi, all,
> When I run, say, 4.6, I get this printout prior to the sage banner:
> Detected SAGE64 flag
> Building Sage on OS X in 64-bit mode
> Is this necessary? There's no build underway, and I imagine that it could
> be disconcerting t
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:24, Alex Leone wrote:
>> Comments? It would be good to discuss this before the upcoming bug days if
>> we are going to do anything with the notebook.
Alex -- can you also post your document to the wiki (or a lin
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Alex Leone wrote:
> Hi all,
> See attached document.
> Comments? It would be good to discuss this before the upcoming bug days if
> we are going to do anything with the notebook.
> - Alex
> PS. There's nothing in the document about the current sage notebook. I
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Marco Streng wrote:
> Op 30-12-2010 22:16, Robert Bradshaw schreef:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, daveloeffler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 1:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
And otherwise it does a "best guess" kind of approach, which is decen
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I've been looking at merging extcode into the main repository, and was
> thinking some cleanup is in order. See
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/extcode for a current listing of contents.
> IIRC, the notebook, images, and jsmath directories are c
On Dec 30, 8:02 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Nice. Here's another. If v is a vector, it would be nice to have:
>
> v.row() -- return a 1-row matrix, same as matrix(v) (i.e., a row vector)
>
> v.column() -- return a 1-column matrix, same as v.transpose() (i.e., a
> column vector)
I like this, too.
I've been looking at merging extcode into the main repository, and was
thinking some cleanup is in order. See
http://wiki.sagemath.org/extcode for a current listing of contents.
IIRC, the notebook, images, and jsmath directories are completely
redundant now, right? Does anyone know what sagebuild i
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Dec 26, 11:03 am, Mag Gam wrote:
>> I will compile boost my self. But why the cropped? is it because of
>> license, size, compile time, etc..?
>
> The subset of boost needed for polybori, another spkg (Sage package),
> is included in Sa
