On Monday, August 20, 2012 8:35:45 PM UTC-7, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> William Stein > writes:
> > Hi Sage-Devel,
> >
> > PROPOSAL: I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk,
> > libgcrypt, and
> > libgpg_error from Sage-5.0. See below for details.
>
> Half a year later, it se
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:35:45 Keshav Kini wrote:
> William Stein writes:
> > Hi Sage-Devel,
> >
> > PROPOSAL: I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk,
> > libgcrypt, and
> > libgpg_error from Sage-5.0. See below for details.
>
> Half a year later, it seems nothing came of this,
William Stein writes:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> PROPOSAL: I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk,
> libgcrypt, and
> libgpg_error from Sage-5.0. See below for details.
Half a year later, it seems nothing came of this, since we still have
all the SPKGs you mentioned being shipped wi
You need a SSL devel type package. On Centos 6.3 (RHEL 6), I have:
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64
openssl098e-0.9.8e-17.el6.centos.2.x86_64
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64
On Ubuntu, I think you need
libssl-dev
openssl
python-openssl
Cheers
On 20/08/12 22:30, Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to develop variants of the LLL algorithm in SAGE. Can someone
please inform me which variants already exist?
Thank you in advance,
Spyros
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
s
Charles Bouillaguet writes:
> charles@light:~/Downloads/sage-5.3.beta1-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux$
I don't think the -sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux binary tarballs
are supposed to work on machines other than the Sage cluster, i.e.
{sage,geom,mod,boxen,redhawk}.math.washington.e
Hi all,
I just downloaded the .tar.gz file on boxen, unpacked it and tried to
run sage:
charles@light:~/Downloads/sage-5.3.beta1-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux$
./sage
--
| Sage Version 5.3.beta1, Release Date: 2012-0
On Monday, 24 January 2011 05:52:33 UTC+11, Pablo W. wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm planning to use sage notebook for a tutorial on numerical
>
> techniques in economics. I would like to leave my students free to
>
> choose the language they already know among octave, R and python .
>
> When doing
Simon King writes:
> Aren't the tests repeated if you set ?kick behind the address of the
> ticket's patchbot page? Or would this use a cached result?
>
> Anyway, if you have a patchbot page where it says "Retry False", append
> ?kick to the address and load it in you browser, it says "Retry True"
On 20 August 2012 07:38, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Thanks to the GCC spkg, most uses of the SAGE_FORTRAN and
> SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB environment variables are not needed anymore. So I
> propose to continue supporting them for now, but *deprecate* their usage.
>
> Instead, we should support the standard v
10 matches
Mail list logo
