[sage-devel] cube roots in Sage

This has been brought up many times before, but I'd like to bring up the possibility of adding two commands to Sage: cuberoot(x) and nthroot(x, n) The reason is that currently plot( x^(1/3), -5, 5) only shows values for x>0, and not for x<0. The current work-around recommended is plot(sign(x)*ab

[sage-devel] Re: docbuild getting stuck

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:41:39 PM UTC-4, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > Apparently this is related to Gap running out of memory and will (should) > be fixed with the merging of #16440. See also > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/4r0QuzzDlg0. > > Best, > Possibly... but I hav

[sage-devel] Re: docbuild getting stuck

Apparently this is related to Gap running out of memory and will (should) be fixed with the merging of #16440. See also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/4r0QuzzDlg0. Best, Travis On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:11:30 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > FWIW, I also run into this occasi

[sage-devel] Re: docbuild getting stuck

FWIW, I also run into this occasionally and have no idea how to fix it. It's particular annoying when trying to review tickets. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14669 doesn't seem to have made it worse or better, has it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

[sage-devel] Re: [hashdist-group] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

I'm mostly available tomorrow (Wednesday) and Thursday pretty much anytime after 7AM pacific. -Chris On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Since nobody showed up, maybe you can suggest when? Do you have time > during the week? > > cc to hashdist list in case somebody hasn't hea

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, François Bissey wrote: > I was available 55mn in but just the two of us wouldn't have done much without > someone from hashdist. > I would have liked to be present because I several interests in this. > Next time tomorrow is not possible for me as I will be in a me

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

I was available 55mn in but just the two of us wouldn't have done much without someone from hashdist. I would have liked to be present because I several interests in this. Next time tomorrow is not possible for me as I will be in a meeting. But generally that kind of time means morning in my time z

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

Since nobody showed up, maybe you can suggest when? Do you have time during the week? cc to hashdist list in case somebody hasn't heard of this thread yet ;-) On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:25:23 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > Good idea, whats a good time? > > I'll be online today at 23:00 BST

[sage-devel] Re: boxen files almost all gone?!

On 2014-06-17, William Stein wrote: > No worries -- I've added you back to the whitelist -- now your page is > fully available again. Thank you, William! Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from th

[sage-devel] Re: Who won the Spies Prize?

+ 1 Congratulations M.Volker Braun...from a french random lambda user, which can benefit in the future for your generous hard working (as comp. engineer and math hobbyist I can surely understand why some nights seem longer than others). -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: boxen files almost all gone?!

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi Leif, > > On 2014-06-17, leif wrote: >> And FWIW, as a sagemath user you can use scp instead to access the >> files; but not all Sage developers have an account. > > And what should people do who have no sagemath account and want to use > m

[sage-devel] Re: boxen files almost all gone?!

Hi Leif, On 2014-06-17, leif wrote: > And FWIW, as a sagemath user you can use scp instead to access the > files; but not all Sage developers have an account. And what should people do who have no sagemath account and want to use my cohomology spkg? Or how should I change my cohomology spkg so

[sage-devel] Re: boxen files almost all gone?!

Hi! On 2014-06-17, David Joyner wrote: > The discussion has been on sagemath-us...@googlegroups.com. > Do you subscribe? No, I don't. And it is a disaster for my group cohomology project, as it is hosted there. Both the main documentation, the code, and the database of cohomology rings. Fortuna

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

Good idea, whats a good time? I'll be online today at 23:00 BST UTC = 22:00 UTC = 15:00PDT. https://plus.google.com/events/cff6ldm40v1skgq5eeslmhg4j5g On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:30:18 PM UTC+1, dagss wrote: > > If you are interested in cooperating perhaps the quickest way to move > forward i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

Just a general +1 to Dag and Ondrej's comments. I should take the blame (and responsibility) for places where documentation or testing is weak. hashdist itself has quite good coverage in its core, and we've been running nightly builds of the Proteus stack on a number of operating systems with it

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:33:24 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > I've spent some time looking at hashdist which is probably the closest to > what we need, but I don't think its the way to go for us right now. First, > Sage depends on the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack on too many places. Before that is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

Hi Volker, Thanks for considering hashdist. Few comments: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > I've spent some time looking at hashdist which is probably the closest to > what we need, but I don't think its the way to go for us right now. First, > Sage depends on the LD_LIBRARY

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

I've spent some time looking at hashdist which is probably the closest to what we need, but I don't think its the way to go for us right now. First, Sage depends on the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack on too many places. Before that is fixed its hard to do anything with a real package management system. At

[sage-devel] Re: trouble with givaro tests on 6.3.beta3

Cher Jean-Guillaume, Thanks for your answer. I compiled again but was not able to reproduce the error (i.e. the test suite passes)! No idea how I can reproduce it... maybe restart compiling Sage from scratch. I will try to see if I can setup the environment to make it reproducible. Vincent 2014

[sage-devel] trouble with givaro tests on 6.3.beta3

Hi, I tried to build sage on a core i7 running ubuntu 14.04 with MAKE="make -j6" and SAGE_CHECK="yes" and it stops in a the testsuite of givaro: ... incoherency between normal : 1027546041851079575537037689256646552061077217898017376 and fixed : 239713952514098819656177342917934530562603654391014

Re: [sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

William is starting to use a whiltelist so anyone who has a reason to have their home directory available via http can do so, just ask him. For the reasons, see thet sagemath-users list. John On 17 June 2014 13:25, leif wrote: > Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 12:51:33 UTC+1

Re: [sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 12:51:33 UTC+1, David Joyner wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > all what is left on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ > is > Index of /home >

Re: [sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 12:51:33 UTC+1, David Joyner wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > all what is left on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ > > is > > Index of /home > > > > The discussion has been on sagemat...@googlegroups.com . > Do you subsc

[sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

all what is left on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ is Index of /home [ICO] NameLast modified SizeDescription [DIR] Parent Directory - [DIR] keshav/ 16-Jun-2014 15:15- [DIR] release/04-Jun-2014 07:50- [DIR] wdj/31-May-2009 07:06- this is not

Re: [sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > all what is left on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ > is > Index of /home > The discussion has been on sagemath-us...@googlegroups.com. Do you subscribe? > [ICO] NameLast modified SizeDescription > [DIR] Parent Directo

[sage-devel] Re: link to git.sagemath.org

I can confirm it... the trailing slash is a common trap with url rules, I guess thats the issue. On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:32:17 AM UTC+1, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > Hi, > > i noticed that the link to the git repo (from www.sagemath.org) is > http://git.sagemath.org/sage.gi

[sage-devel] link to git.sagemath.org

Hi, i noticed that the link to the git repo (from www.sagemath.org) is http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/ that is locked to 6.3.beta1, while http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git (without trailing slash) seems to offer a fresher view. It is not only a question about trailing slash in the link, since whe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Who won the Spies Prize?

Congratulations! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Who won the Spies Prize?

Congratulations, Volker. Well deserved! On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Indeed, congratulations! > > On Monday 16 Jun 2014 12:59:08 kcrisman wrote: >> http://youtu.be/I9Myt5NTeCc >> >> >> Congratulations, Volker! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Who won the Spies Prize?

Indeed, congratulations! On Monday 16 Jun 2014 12:59:08 kcrisman wrote: > http://youtu.be/I9Myt5NTeCc > > > Congratulations, Volker! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

[sage-devel] Incorrect random link.

Hello, The random link on the web page, when pointing to SageTex, is incorrect Random Link: SageTeX - embedding Sage code inside LaTeX documents. (It is pointing to a non existing url in CTAN). Yours t.d. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-de