ks.
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/3462/
Regards
Anthony David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.0.rc0.
>
> Source archive:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.rc0/sage-5.0.rc0.tar
>
> Upgrade path:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.rc0/sage-5.0.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.0.rc0.
>
> Source archive:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.rc0/sage-5.0.rc0.tar
>
> Upgrade path:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.rc0/sage-5.0.
FYI
I submitted a bug report [ http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Review:Sage-BUG-1 ]
because the directory entry [ http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Sage ] was a
tad out-of-date.
The blurb is lifted from bits of text on the Sage website. Feel free to
suggest further changes.
Regards
Anthony David
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The following tests failed on sage.math:
>
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py
> **
> File
> "/scratch/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha1/devel
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 6:31 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > Should we be using "twitter" for something?
>
> no, and http://twitter.com/sagemath and hardly alive. you have the
> account details somewhere in your emails ;)
I tweeted a bit about sage bu
Corrected patch uploaded. My limited testing (i686 Debian) - looks
good. Requires review/testing on other OS/arch.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-uns
had a
test box I had reassembled and wanted to exercise it so a sage test
build seemed like a good idea.]
Anthony David
> I looked at an install.log of one of my builds of Sage using the Solaris
> binaries from Micheal and see the compiler was configured with:
>
>
> GCC Version
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:25 PM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Also, why not give them some real life example for why to use a
> free/opensource program instead of a commercial one. I think this is
> far more important then money. In example, one of a professor at my
> university has written a p
