[sage-devel] Re: programming: define a new function

2009-04-19 Thread Martin Musatov
Aha! Quite the challenge is it not? On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Maurizio wrote: > > Hi all > > > Well, we just need a resultant algorithm that doesn't go through > > Singular. I'm planning to write such a thing as part of my > > cylindrical algebraic decomposition implementation sometime in

[sage-devel] Re: Error building from Source on Linux - libgcrypt-1.4.3 - Assembler messages

2009-04-19 Thread Martin Musatov
Yep, that's me! On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Mike Cripps wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have been attempting to install Sage today from the source, and when > I ran `make` I got the following output (after a lot of stuff compiled > fine): > > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-devel]primegaps

2009-04-19 Thread Martin Musatov
My question is how do prime numbers play into ground level computational programming? What is a "troll" and what is a "couch boy"? Why is there is so much resistance from the community at large against establishment of computational complexity, specifically the claim that [P=NP] seems to be a parti