As a user of sage, I'm quite happy with all of the work that has been
going in to the Solaris port lately. Currently I have to use it from
a zone running linux, which isn't so bad except the zones typically
run older distributions of Linux. I know it creates additional work
and I also thank all t
The OpenSolaris development repository seems to have a release cycle
of two weeks, but they have a source release or build which is made
available for internal testing (and whoever wants to test it badly
enough to build and install it themselves) roughly two weeks before
each release. From a user
psrinfo -v seems to be one option, though I think /proc/cpuinfo seems
to be better in linux.
On Jan 12, 11:08 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Bill Hart wrote:
> > MPIR should detect all known intel and amd CPU's (MPIR 1.3 will also
> > detect via and atom's), but for some reason it doesn't detec
On Sep 22, 6:25 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I spent a while thinking that I was going to be a mechanical engineer,
> and took a few of the ME intro courses. Engineering statics and
> dynamics can be phrased entirely in terms of linear algebra, though
> the courses I took didn't present them as su
On the latest opensolaris running on amd64 and using gcc 4.4.1 I did
hit the bug you mentioned, but in sqlite (running the gnu autotools
again for sqlite did not seem to help):
ar cru .libs/libsqlite3.a sqlite3.o
ranlib .libs/libsqlite3.a
creating libsqlite3.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libsqlite3.la
The SCons wiki even seems to be trying to say cmake is better:
http://www.scons.org/wiki/SconsVsOtherBuildTools ;-) I have no
opinion myself, other than the problems you have already outlined;
another dev I know has also expressed his dislike of it, but he cannot
be trusted in this matter since h
Maybe I'm missing something but wouldn't it be best to ask the authors
of Pari what the purpose of these lines are? I also feel like making
a change we don't understand at all (at least I don't) could be bad.
If we cannot for some reason then I like Dave's idea of running tests
of a build with th
an
update whenever I get around to making a patch.
On Sep 24, 6:20 pm, "brandon.bar...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I'd like to put together an spkg for pydstool - would this be a useful
> package for sage's core
> distribution?http://www.cam
I'd like to put together an spkg for pydstool - would this be a useful
package for sage's core distribution?
http://www.cam.cornell.edu/~rclewley/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
It seems impossible to cover all sage functionality with menus, but
they could be helpful when dealing with symbols.
How about popout windows that contain menus? Users could even make
their own menus and call them up as they wished, without effecting the
overall notebook GUI.
Units could be usef
On Aug 29, 12:21 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
> > Juanjo wrote:
> >> On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> >> wrote:
> >>> Using the first release of Solaris 10 should iron out any other
> >>> portability issues, since perhaps ou
> > You also mentioned that the setup in this machine would be
> > intentionally less polished (i.e. GNU make is not default, and other
> > things you set up for T2). Would it be possible to evolve the T2 setup
> > towards something more out-of-the-box? Or is it unrealistic to build
> > all Sage
/usr/local/lib/libmpfr.*
/usr/local/lib/libmpfr.a /usr/local/lib/libmpfr.so/usr/local/lib/
libmpfr.so.1.2.0
/usr/local/lib/libmpfr.la /usr/local/lib/libmpfr.so.1
On Aug 5, 2:14 pm, "brandon.bar...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I did try setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH but this resulted i
If I rebuild gcc with this, this
linking configuration ...
Could you post your gcc configuration (gcc -v) that you use on your
SXCE machine whenever you have a chance to?
Thanks,
On Aug 5, 12:12 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> brandon.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Actually this s
Actually this seems to be an issue with it trying to link to the
system mpfr. Shouldn't sage built its own mpfr?
On Aug 4, 9:01 pm, "brandon.bar...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Well, I didn't have any trouble with MPIR in 4.1.1.rc0!
>
> bash-3.2$ ls
.p0/src'
ERROR building termcap
On Aug 4, 8:45 pm, "brandon.bar...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I think my current gcc toolchain may be doomed, as it uses the sun
> linker and the gnu assembler! (I read this was a good thing to do, at
> least at some point in history).
>
>
lding MPIR on OpenSolaris due to the linker
problems you noted on the wiki; if you can get mpir to use a correct
version of libtool (the one in /usr/bin worked) this problem
disappears.
On Aug 3, 8:29 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> 2009/8/3 brandon.bar...@gmail.com :
>
>
>
> > I look
I look forward to testing and building it on opensolaris / intel.
On Aug 3, 4:21 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Robert Dodier wrote:
> > On Aug 3, 8:56 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>
> >> So we can expect 5.19 sometime in August, is that correct? Any rough
> >> idea when it might be - first
Interesting to know. I've only been using Solaris for a little over a
year, and I've been more familiar with blastwave.org and the new
opensolaris source juicer repository ( jucr.opensolaris.org ).
I think it would be more useful to distribute sage for solaris as a
zone with a preconfigured (whi
I had a different issue with mpir on opensolaris, basically it wasn't
using a libtool that would work.
This was completely fixed by copying /usr/bin/libtool to /export/home/
brandon/sage-4.0.2/spkg/build/mpir-1.2.p4/src
I tried to edit the spkg install file to take this into account but I
didn'
This error message is a bit unusual to me. I'm trying to build it in
a solaris lx zone (apparently modern distros aren't supported yet -
centos 5.3 is as close as it gets that I know of):
from install.log:
cp /home/brandon/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/src/../contrib/
unicode/ucd.dat .
if [
Hello,
I'm very happy about the improved Solaris support. Until recently I
was running sage in a linux zone on my workstation, but unfortunately
modern linux version support for branded zones is lagging. I confess
I've also been using sagenb.org a bit (which will be running on a
T2000 soon?) I
22 matches
Mail list logo
