On Feb 21, 8:06 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:03 PM, bsdz wrote:
> > I used to be able to obtain a function name in Sage 3+ using something
> > like the following: -
>
> > fu = function('fu', x)
> > print fu._f._n
Hi
I used to be able to obtain a function name in Sage 3+ using something
like the following: -
fu = function('fu', x)
print fu._f._name
# would print "fu"
I notice that this does not work in Sage 4 and "fu" is no longer a
SymbolicFunctionEvaluation but an Expression.
Is there a way to obtain t
On 3 Aug, 20:07, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Brian Granger
> > wrote:
>
> >> I just pinged the pythonmac-sig group about why and when a framework
> >> build is actually needed. A while back I created an spk
On 3 Aug, 20:17, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >> Also, what is the state of the windows port of Sage --- will it be
> >> possible to just maintain one spkg and it would build on windows, or
> >> will it be necessary to maintain one spkg for linux/m
On 15 June, 17:48, javier wrote:
> This looks like good news for sage:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
The idea of rewriting of Python's VM to use LLVM is a similar goal to
that of Parrot's VM (http://www.parrot.org/). What makes it more
interesting is that they pla
best forget it though.
On 27 Jan, 07:58, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, bsdz wrote:
>
> > I see what you mean by the download size. Perhaps another option might
> > be to offer the source code as a separate download if any is included.
>
> Al
wrote:
> Hi Blair,
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, bsdz wrote:
> > Is there any where this could be added to the main distribution?
>
> I made a few modifications to your routine to match some of the style
> conventions used in Sage. Also, instead of passing in the var
Hi
I have written a simple function that generates Bell Polynomials.
It is documented and published at http://sagenb.org:8000/home/pub/182/
Is there any where this could be added to the main distribution?
Cheers
--
Blair
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gr
e the VMware session, I admit
that is a solution but probably quite tricky for an ordinary Windows
user. I prefer to use WinSCP that gives the same look and feel as
Explorer.
--
Blair
On Jan 26, 8:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to thank bsdz for responding, and emphas
I feel one fairly big problem with the VMware installation is the
sheer size of the binary to download. Other issues are performance;
running a Sage server in a VMware session is noticeable slower than
connecting to an on-line Linux version. Then there are some practical
problems such as accessing
I use it! Actually in my first notebook. Please don't remove.
On Jan 23, 1:43 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> Does anyone use this module anymore? It seems, well, a little silly...
>
> sage: P = Primes()
> sage: P
> Set of all prime numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, ...
> sage: 3 in P
> True
> sage: 4 in P
> Fals
I admit it wouldn't be for everyone. Initially I tried loading it in
using a GreaseMonkey script but discovered that was too late in the
DOM tree. What would be nice is if one could add plug-ins. Perhaps
they could be loaded using xml files much like Google allows. These
initially could be to pers
t.
Thanks for the update.
On 8 Jan, 20:24, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 6, 1:33 am, bsdz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Blair,
>
> > I dabbled a little with the vmware version of Sage and was able to
> > install EditArea, a javascript syntax highlighting library
> >
Hi,
I dabbled a little with the vmware version of Sage and was able to
install EditArea, a javascript syntax highlighting library (http://
www.cdolivet.net/index.php?page=editArea). It is quite useful when
editing Python and can be turned on or off. It also allows callbacks
so pressing the save b
14 matches
Mail list logo
