Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc0 released

Dima, The word "G..v..d...e" is the worst curse in the Dutch language. The first three letters needs no translation. The rest translates to 'damn'. You shouldn't use it lightly. Jaap Op wo 26 apr. 2023 21:20 schreef Dima Pasechnik : > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 8:18

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for Github Op wo 21 sep. 2022 19:23 schreef David Roe : > Dear Sage developers, > Following extensive discussion, both recently > > (prompted > by issues upgrading the trac server) and over >

[sage-devel] Re: Reviving the Annual SageMath Development Prize

Excellent idea! For me it was good in the early years of sage to contribute some code and give some financial support in the form of the Spies Prize. I'm not in the position now to lineup as a donor, but I probably will for the 2022 version. Best regards, Jaap Spies On Wednesday, Apr

[sage-devel] **WARNING** /var/cache/sympow/datafiles/le64 yields insufficient permissions

On Fedora 34 on an i7 running ptestlong I get some failures all related to subject. Never seen this before. A chmod 0777 /var/cache/sympow/datafiles/le64 'solved' the problem, but is it a solution? [jaap@vrede sage-9.4]$ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 129.3 --random-seed=0 src/sa

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 11:21:15 PM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Instructions: Go to https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/ > Download your Pi Imager if you want. > I use BalenaEtcher on an old windows loaptop with card reader. > I could also use another Raspbery Pi with USB

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

━━━┛ sage: It would be great to get it in debian and raspbian! > Dima > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:01 PM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

Instructions: Go to https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/ Download your Pi Imager if you want. I use BalenaEtcher on an old windows loaptop with card reader. I could also use another Raspbery Pi with USB card reader to dd the image to the SD card. My main machine has no card reader at all. So yo

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

have it up and running you can use an USB cardreader. Best > Dima > > >> Regards, >> >> Sverre Lunøe-Nielsen >> >> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 1:52:52 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020,

[sage-devel] Re: Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

ated to timeouts. But a port is nearby. SymPy can easily be installed on a Raspberry Pi using pip. I have it > running on > multiple Pi 3B+ and 4Bs. > > Regards, > Jonathan > > On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 6:01:17 AM UTC-5 jaap... wrote: > >> >> We will never get tha

[sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

nd have no time and no energy to pursue this to the end, but I plea someone would take this serious. Jaap early adapter of sage \end quote I wanted to start a discussion on the need to be present on the Raspberry Pi platform. But my intentions were buried under a lot of technicalities. SAGE was i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

gt; > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of > sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. > > As far as I see, it is > https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/raspberry-pi-desktop/

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

No On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 11:22:30 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim m

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. At least we need a binary of sagemath for Raspberry Pi OS. Jaap Spies On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 2:31:52 PM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are z

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Done. On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 3:58:20 PM UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:31:52 AM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote: >> >> ... Raspberry Pi ... >> > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091, which adds test infrastructure > for ra

Re: [sage-devel] Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

9.2.beta4 > > Please report whether it works for you or not. > > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 13:31 Jaap Spies, > > wrote: > >> Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are zillion Raspberry Pi's >> out there. >> Almost all of them are running Raspbian,

[sage-devel] Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

minor. I think it is of major importance to have at least a binary for Raspberry Pi OS! I'm old and have no time and no energy to pursue this to the end, but I plea someone would take this serious. Jaap early adapter of sage -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

Yes. Sorry Martin. I mixed things up. Martin knows of the problem. He reacted in the thread. Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:58:14 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 10:34 Jaap Spies, > > wrote: > >> This was me on sagerelease. S

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

See ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091 Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:34:40 AM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed. > According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM. > > Jaap > > > On Wedne

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed. According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM. Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 8:21:48 AM UTC+2, tdumont wrote: > > Some weeks ago, there was a post on this list (or an other sage list) > where somebod

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 10 years ago

Maybe you noticed that Dima did his first contribution to sage 10 years ago. Cheers, Jaap Op ma 24 feb. 2020 02:07 schreef Samuel Lelievre : > Ten years ago: > > Sage Days 20 > https://wiki.sagemath.org/daysmarseille > https://www.lirmm.fr/arith/wiki/MathInfo2010/S

[sage-devel] 10 years ago

https://github.com/sagemath/website/blob/master/src/changelogs/sage-4.3.3.txt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

seconds NOW: All test passed in 2.08 seconds ./sage -t --long src/sage/misc/weak_dict.pyx # 11 doctests failed ./sage -t --long src/sage/cpython/dict_del_by_value.pyx # 1 doctest failed On Tuesday, December 31, 2019 at 10:58:38 AM UTC+1, Jaap Spies wrote: > > > > On Monday, Decem

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

On Monday, December 30, 2019 at 11:21:34 PM UTC+1, Jaap Spies wrote: > > > > I'll make a bash script to do the tests stand alone. > > >> bash test_errors_rc1 >> err.log 2>&1 & Resume: ./sage -t --long src/sage/rings/tests.py # Killed due to s

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

Hi Dima, I don't understand what I see and I hate that. Seeing 4 CPU's producing heat, four instances of python 3 gathering CPU time. producing 0 test of 0.00s duration. There is something not OK in the Raspberry Pi system. I don't trust the memory management system at all. make ptestlong ended

[sage-devel] Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

Why? Because it is possible. And the OS Raspbian is distributed with a version of Mathematica 12.0 First attempt was building sage-8.9. Just did a 'make' after downloading. The RPi 4 showed unstable. The little computer stalled a few times. Power off and power on. After 12 hours there was a run

[sage-devel] Re: Please test sage-5.1.rc1

://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html If there are no problems, then sage-5.1 will be released identical to sgae-5.1.rc1. Jeroen. [jaap@vrede sage-5.1.rc1]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.3/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64

[sage-devel] Re: MathCad-like front end for Sage

ity to get people involved, even if at first they work on something of interest to them that others might consider a "waste of resources." I think it's a shame that the tone on the sage-devel list is not as welcoming as it used to be, and I think we suffer a loss of developers because o

[sage-devel] Re: Valgrind package very old

icket/7766#comment:9 Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: vtk

. Cheers, Jaap -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: inconsistent results for characteristic polynomial?

hat you're thinking about,' said Tweedledum; `but it isn't so, nohow.' `Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.' :-) Jaap John -- To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.4.alpha0 released

! Timings have been updated. Total time for all tests: 1033.4 seconds [j...@vrede sage-4.4.4.alpha0]$ Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.1 build failures with gcc 4.4.1 on SUSE 11.2

SAGE_CHECK=yes Don't do this! SAGE64="yes" is reserved for building 64 bit on OSX and (Open) Solaris! Don't set SAGE_CHECK unless you know what you are doing. Jaap SAGE_ROOT= Best, Paul -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.2.alpha0 released

! -- All tests passed! Upgrade from sage-4.4.1 Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options

[sage-devel] Re: is the latest valgrind optional spkg at version valgrind-3.5.0.p0?

for a newer valgrind. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: MPIR and GMP: an announcement

John Cremona wrote: On 1 April 2010 17:21, Jaap Spies wrote: Tom Boothby wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Francesco Biscani wrote: Erm, April 1st? An Australian, playing a prank? I shouldn't think they'd know how. They're such a serious bunch. I've hardly ev

[sage-devel] Re: MPIR and GMP: an announcement

't met him at dinner with a glass of good Australian wine. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g

[sage-devel] Re: Can a 4.3.5 be created to fix the Fedora/Mandriva/OpenSUSE build problem?

do not like it when there are two copies of iconv (system install and $SAGE_LOCAL) +1 Jaap Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this

[sage-devel] Re: Bug advertisement

Alec Mihailovs wrote: Jaap, But wait! A native Windows Sage is almost there. That would be excellent! I'm not sure that cygwin would work on my 64- bit system (never tried it though.) On my ugly 64 bit system I can run 32 bit software without a problem :) Jaap Alec -- To po

[sage-devel] Re: Bug advertisement

ative Windows Sage is almost there. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL:

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

Harald Schilly wrote: On Mar 21, 7:14 pm, William Stein wrote: Minh Van Nguyen is an integral part of the Sage development effort. Congratulations, and yes, that's so true !! H Thanks for updating: http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html Jaap -- To post to this group, se

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

hour ago ! And Bravo to Minh ! Two thumbs up ! When we shout out loud, he'll probably wake up from his "snooze". Jaap Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4 released

William Stein wrote: On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, Sage 4.3.4 was released on March 19, 2010. It is available at http://www.sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) Sage is developed by volunteers and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4 released

.tar On Fedora 12 x86_64 I had build failures with gd and atlas. The gd issue could be resolved by putting /usr/include/iconv.h and /usr/bin/iconv aside. make[9]: Entering directory `/home/jaap/downloads/sage-4.3.4.rc0/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build/tune/sysinfo' gcc -O -fomit-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.4 fails to build on openSuSE 11.1 x86_64.

of the way made it possible to build gd So nothing wrong with the libiconv in SAGE_LOCAL Jaap Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options,

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.4 does not build on Mandriva 2010 64 bits

s/libgd.so: undefined reference to `libiconv_open' collect2: ld a retourné 1 code d'état d'exécution make[4]: *** [annotate] Erreur This is ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567 [...] Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.4 fails to build on openSuSE 11.1 x86_64.

don't have time to do it for you just now - sorry. dave A better option might be to specify the path of libiconv if the gd configure script will allow this to be done. I'm looking into that. Jaap dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com T

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.rc0 builds ok on Solaris 10 (SPARC)

ackage or/and the one who gave it a positive review should have tested this change on all supported platforms :)!? Moreover the releasemanager should have tested it on all available machines. IMHO, the updates to .spkg files are not being done carefully enough. +1 Jaap -- To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.rc0 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, This release candidate cleans up warnings resulting from building the Sage documentation. If there are no show stoppers, then this release is considered the final release candidate. Sorry, but once again the build failed: gcc -fPIC -g -I/home/jaap/downloads/sage

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 released!

--enable-java-maintainer-mode --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --disable-libjava-multilib --with-ppl --with-cloog --with-tune=generic --with-arch_32=i686 --build=x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.3 20100127 (Red Hat 4.4.3-4) (GCC) gcc -fPIC -g -I/home/jaap/downloads

[sage-devel] Re: Is CMake OK for a standard spkg?

works on lots of platforms like Solaris, Linux and Windows according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMake An experimental spkg can be found here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/SPKGS/ETS/cmake-2.6.2.spkg An update to cmake-2.8 is easy. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

te. You remember correctly a discussion on IRC. I offered to put a scan of the relevant page on line. I'm interested. Please do. I will not put this scan in the open. My lady friend who happens to be a lawyer, advised me so. I'll send it by email. Jaap -- To post to this gro

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

te. You remember correctly a discussion on IRC. I offered to put a scan of the relevant page on line. I'm interested. Please do. Hold on. I'm scanning. Jaap Jaap Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

t up! :), but my memory may be inaccurate. You remember correctly a discussion on IRC. I offered to put a scan of the relevant page on line. Jaap Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+un

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.3 (with patches) builds on Solaris 10 (SPARC) !!!

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I believe I have *finally* got the latest Sage (with some patches) to build on Solaris 10 (SPARC). Feel free to see at http://redstart.drkirkby.co.uk:8000/ I'd be interested if it works for others. 1+1 gives: Trac

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.3 (with patches) builds on Solaris 10 (SPARC) !!!

block for traceback) ... NameError: name '_interact_' is not defined Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "_sage_input_3.py", line 8, in _interact_.SAGE_CELL_ID=1 NameError: name '_interact_' is not defined I'm sorry,

[sage-devel] Re: Vpython?

ython is not in Sage. Nobody has mentioned it seriously on any Sage mailing lists for about a year, when Jaap made a highly experimental spkg which would on some versions of Linux, which he posted here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/SPKGS/VPython/ Is there a good reason? It&#

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris port / Implement 2-isogeny descent / or Fix ???

Mike Hansen wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see: http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169 From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED _XOPEN_SOURCE _POSIX_C_SOURCE

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris port / Implement 2-isogeny descent / or Fix ???

lding ratpoints with * -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 * -std=c99 * -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see: http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169 Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Dima Pasechnik wrote: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6395191 It's a bug, known for 4 years, and nobody is fixing it, it seems... See: http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169 for some further reading. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

David Kirkby wrote: On 1 February 2010 19:29, Jaap Spies wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with A build log can be found here: http://boxen.math.washingto

[sage-devel] Re: Can one run all doctests from the GUI ?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: [...] However, on OpenSolaris, the issue is more severe. Both Jaap and William will confirm that the test in python for hashlib has failed. To a certain extend. I had opensll installed on Open Solaris, but more than once on different places

[sage-devel] Re: Error building v4.3.1 on Fedora 12 (32-bit)

e-4.3.2.rc0 with export SAGE_CHECK="yes" yields a different set of errors this time: Successfully installed pyprocessing-0.52.p0 OK, pyprocessing is in principle out iirc. Are you building with SAGE_CHECK = something non empty? I think this will fail not only here. I would do a unset SAGE_CHEC

[sage-devel] Re: Where is the log file for the tests kept?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: If I run ./sage -t devel where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a global install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any directories under $SAGE_ROOT? just do ./sage -t devel 2>&1 | tee /tmp/testdevel.log or so.

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

Harald Schilly wrote: On Feb 5, 6:59 pm, kcrisman wrote: This should be put on the experimental page (Harald?) because it installed fine. Ok, together with a short description text, ... but ... On Feb 5, 7:51 pm, Jaap Spies wrote: Last year I made a lot of experimental packages. They

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

kcrisman wrote: On Feb 5, 5:47 am, Jaap Spies wrote: kcrisman wrote: It also says it needs Cmake Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says it needs 2.6 or above. You can find one here:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg This should

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

kcrisman wrote: It also says it needs Cmake Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says it needs 2.6 or above. You can find one here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel

[sage-devel] Re: Supported Platforms web page is *very* out of date

st are volunteers and that any demanding tone will not get us anywhere. We all do it from time to time, when we are frustrated, but it does not help anyone. +1 You spoke wise words! Jaap Cheers, Martin -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with A build log can be found here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/tests/matplotlib_build.log I'm coming closer b

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi Jaap, On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody? Certainly not. Not on mine. Thanks! Please help. I'm very new with OpenSolaris. But is there an OpenSolaris machine somewhere I could use to help?

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with /usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h: In static member function ‘s

[sage-devel] Re: Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

87 945 Only last time things went wrong in upgrading to sage-4.3.1. I have to look into that. Jaap Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit

[sage-devel] c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h:350: error: ‘wmemset’ was not declared in this scope Any thoughts? Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

this mess! Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Quite a few spkg-install are a simply: python setup.py install. They fail on Open Solaris x64 if CFLAGS does not include -m64. There's no

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: We know from recent discussions over sage-env and the hassles that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 caused, that setting CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: We know from recent discussions over sage-env and the hassles that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 caused, that setting CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS etc globally will cause a build failure in Sage. It would therefore seem

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

if someone sets CFLAGS when building Sage. I think it is more sensible that the spkgs involved do an 'unset CFLAGS', etc.. Laying the resposibilities were they belong. A lot of spkgs will not built in 64 bit mode unless CFLAGS has a sensible flag. Jaap -- To post to this group, sen

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

Robert Miller wrote: I remember merging both of those. :) Sorry guys, my bad. Looks like once again I've spoken too soon. I guess I only merged the first fix.. At one time there were two release managers :) Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

ckage from William: == Changelog == === python-2.6.4.p5 (William Stein, Jan 20, 2010) === * Fix bug on Itanium introduced by typo by Craig in #60. See trac 8020. Jaap Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an emai

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

lly Python fail to build I hacked it in my build. There should be a ticket to solve this problem. Last night (and today) I forgot about it. Sorry. Jaap Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-deve

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2.alpha0 test failures on Fedora 12

m.py" # Segfault sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_sparse.pyx" # Segfault sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx" # Segfault sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_space.py" # Segfault Finally some one with test failures that

[sage-devel] Re: Exhibit booth for 2011 joint meetings

redit card: https://secure.gifts.washington.edu/as_mathematics/gift.asp?page=make&Code=MATSAG I can confirm. Even from Europe you can select your country. There is one problem left. In The Netherlands we have a zip code with a space like: 7824 BM. The form doesn't handle that correctly.

[sage-devel] numpy and Open Solaris 64 bit

Hi, I have a patch. Numpy builds ok on Open Solaris, but ... There are a few problems in trac. There are patches on p2 and there is even a numpyp3.spkg waiting for review and inclusion. Maintainers, please solve this issues, so I can go on. I'll wait until this is sorted out.

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE_FORTRNA on OS X.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: There is a hiatus in the spkg-install. If you only export SAGE_FORTRAN on Open Solaris with SAGE64="yes" the script picks up the wrong lib. ../lib/amd64/libgfortran is needed. That is not going

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Robert, the advantage is that it will simplify the *development* of Sage. Right now lots of stoppers seem to come from upstream packages. I also do not see a real problem

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

stumbling stone in the port of Sage to Open Solaris 64 bit! As it comes to building libsingular I have no clue at the moment. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For mo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] sage -upgrade

to force rebuild of some code that depends > on fortran libraries. > See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8025 > Even with this trick upgrading my system wide install on Fedora failed. This was meant to be upgrade number 87 :-)! Jaap >  -- William > -- To post to this group

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr David Kirkby wrote: From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker 'ld' http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works. (Th

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

t rarely needed). Can you explain this? There are spkgs which use g++ as linker, e.g. givaro, linbox. Jaap Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more opti

[sage-devel] Re: numpy on Open Solaris 64 bit

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi, A patched version of numpy-1.3.0 seems to build and install On Open Solaris 06/09 real 0m46.014s user 0m41.791s sys 0m2.656s Successfully installed numpy-1.3.0.p3 [...] from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: relocation error: file

[sage-devel] numpy on Open Solaris 64 bit

Hi, A patched version of numpy-1.3.0 seems to build and install On Open Solaris 06/09 real0m46.014s user0m41.791s sys 0m2.656s Successfully installed numpy-1.3.0.p3 You can safely delete the temporary build directory /export/home/jaap/sage_port/sage-4.3.1.rc0/spkg/build/numpy-1.3.0

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

was the "usual" test failure with segfaults. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7773 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7766 On Open Solaris 64 bit I'm stuck at numpy. Attacking that now. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com

[sage-devel] Re: mpir-1.2.2.p0 fails on centos32, debian32, and opensuse32

sn't going to work. This is on 32-bit opensuse. Strange. It uses ABI="64" Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage build hangs on fplll

.46*** cc1plus Any ideas what might cause this? I had this hang on Fedora 12 with MAKE = "make -j6" Building with make -j1 worked ok. Testing with ./sage -tp 6 hangs to. Make test finished with the usual errors. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@google

[sage-devel] Re: Error in building/installing linbox on Open Solaris 64 bit

58). But given your compilation error trace, I don't see the error: the static thing is only a warning. isn't the error somewhere earlier in the trace, that you cut off? Yes: [...] g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I. -I../../linbox -g -I/export/home/jaap/Downloads/sage-4

[sage-devel] Error in building/installing linbox on Open Solaris 64 bit

‘static’ but never defined make[5]: *** [linbox-sage.lo] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/export/home/jaap/Downloads/sage-4.3.1.alpha2/spkg/build/linbox-1.1.6.p2/src/interfaces/sage' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/export/home/jaap/Downloads/sage-4.3.1

[sage-devel] Re: mpir-1.2.2.p0 fails on centos32, debian32, and opensuse32

well understood - Flint does not properly reconise Japp's processor. Flint believes the processor is a 486 (i.e. 32-bit) and so offers no 64-bit ABI. I can't see any connection myself. flint -> mpir Japp -> Jaap :-) But I agree. Can't see a connection. Jaap -- To pos

[sage-devel] Re: Linbox complains GMP is not installed on Solaris 10 (64-bit mode)

whether to compile the sage interface... yes checking for C interface to BLAS... not found checking for others BLAS... not found Building of linbox on Open Solaris 06/2009 in VirtualBox ends with: -- Libraries have been installed i

[sage-devel] Re: Building ATLAS libraries failed on Open Solaris

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: I'm almost there: Finished building ATLAS core The Makefile generated in ATLAS for building shared libraries assumes the linker is the GNU linker, which it not true in your setup. (It is generally considered better to use the Sun linker in /usr/cc

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: 4.3.1.alpha2

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Robert Miller wrote: I've finished merging for sage-4.3.1.alpha2, but due to... technical difficulties, the best place I can put it right now is in /scratch/r

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >