Re: [sage-devel] How are mirrors chosen for "sage -upgrade" ?

2010-09-08 Thread William Stein
On Wednesday, September 8, 2010, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Sep 8, 1:03 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: >> If the ping time to boxen.math.washington.edu is an order of magnitude less >> than >> any other mirror ... > > I've coded this and back then I thought this is a good idea, but maybe > it's n

Re: [sage-devel] How are mirrors chosen for "sage -upgrade" ?

2010-09-07 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 09/07/2010 06:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I decided to run "sage -upgrade" today - for about the first time ever. > I'm going to try to upgrade sage-4.5.3.alpha2 to sage-4.5.3. I don't > know if its a good idea to update alphas or not, but I'm not bothered if > it fails or not. > > > I ge

[sage-devel] How are mirrors chosen for "sage -upgrade" ?

2010-09-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I decided to run "sage -upgrade" today - for about the first time ever. I'm going to try to upgrade sage-4.5.3.alpha2 to sage-4.5.3. I don't know if its a good idea to update alphas or not, but I'm not bothered if it fails or not. I get this: Testing mirrors... [2 ] boxen.math.washington