Re: [sage-devel] OpenSSL issue *may* be solved on Solaris.

2010-02-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Feb-03 00:40:47 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: Peter Jeremy wrote: I'm not sure if SUNWopenssl-libraries is mandatory. Definitely we don't have the command line interface (the openssl command) installed on our S10 boxes. With a few rare exceptions, I've use

Re: [sage-devel] OpenSSL issue *may* be solved on Solaris.

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Feb-03 00:40:47 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: >Peter Jeremy wrote: >> I'm not sure if SUNWopenssl-libraries is mandatory. Definitely >> we don't have the command line interface (the openssl command) >> installed on our S10 boxes. > >With a few rare exceptions, I've usefully done

Re: [sage-devel] OpenSSL issue *may* be solved on Solaris.

2010-02-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Feb-01 07:49:45 +, David Kirkby wrote: I discovered that Sun do ship Open SSL 0.9.7, complete with any security fixes, with Solaris. Sun obviously have some agreement with the OpenSSL developers, as they will know of security vunrabilites before they are made pub

Re: [sage-devel] OpenSSL issue *may* be solved on Solaris.

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Feb-01 07:49:45 +, David Kirkby wrote: >I discovered that Sun do ship Open SSL 0.9.7, complete with any >security fixes, with Solaris. Sun obviously have some agreement with >the OpenSSL developers, as they will know of security vunrabilites >before they are made public. That's good.

[sage-devel] OpenSSL issue *may* be solved on Solaris.

2010-01-31 Thread David Kirkby
After reading http://blogs.sun.com/janp/entry/on_openssl_versions_in_solaris I discovered that Sun do ship Open SSL 0.9.7, complete with any security fixes, with Solaris. Sun obviously have some agreement with the OpenSSL developers, as they will know of security vunrabilites before they are made