Fixes the issues I was having. Thanks!
David
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> > If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
> > some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release
> > a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
>
> Hi David and ot
> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
> some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release
> a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
Hi David and other pyrex developers,
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=sage-mode-0.6-dr.spkg
o
> Speaking of C-c C-j: could it be made to jump to the next sage prompt
> if not currently on one?
>
> Also (since you requested feature requests): I am still dreaming of a
> variant of C-c C-j which would send all the doctests from the top of
> the file down to the current point.
C-u C-c C-j sho
On 16-May-09, at 1:54 AM, dagss wrote:
>
> On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
>> some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to
>> release
>> a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
>
> Is there a reason you are not us
On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander wrote:
> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
> some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release
> a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
Is there a reason you are not using the cython-mode which ships with
Cython? (In the
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:57:53PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hmm. What is M-; bound to for you? For me, it's `comment-dwim',
> which is the greatest thing since sliced bread -- it really does do
> what I mean! In a docstring, if you're on a line with non-comment
> text, it adds a com
> Oops, I mean C-q C-i
Hmm. What is M-; bound to for you? For me, it's `comment-dwim',
which is the greatest thing since sliced bread -- it really does do
what I mean! In a docstring, if you're on a line with non-comment
text, it adds a comment to the end of the line. Save for the space
> > Here is my use case. I
> > like to have comments in my tests neatly aligned:
> >
> > sage: foo # todo: ...
> > sage: bar # done!
> > sage: ... # blah
> >
> > Since is not available for this in docstrings, I took the (bad)
> > habit of usi
> Hmm, probably my reason for having tabs is bad, and should be fixed in
> the first place by having the right feature.
Yes, this is not a good use for tabs :)
> Here is my use case. I
> like to have comments in my tests neatly aligned:
>
> sage: foo # todo: ...
> sage: ba
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56:53PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> >>> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers
> >>> automatic completion:
> >>
> >>
On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers
>>> automatic completion:
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned, tabs in input are always wrong. Python even
>>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> > - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers
> > automatic completion:
>
> As far as I'm concerned, tabs in input are always wrong. Python even
> has an error (TabError) for this, no? This is wontfix f
On Tue, 12 May 2009 at 05:05PM -0700, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
> depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
> like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
> to edit the doctest
> Yippee! All of those are serious time savers! Thanks!
>
>> Beta testers, please let me know what problems you have.
>> I felt like I added a lot of requested features this iteration, so
>> keep them coming.
>
> I will :-)
>
> An to start with:
>
> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the i
Jason Grout wrote:
> Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>>
>> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
>>depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
>>like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
>>to edit the doctests in
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
>
> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
>depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
>like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
>to edit the doctests in rst-mode and the code
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:32PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> I am pleased to announce the release of sage-mode-0.6, the all-
> singing, all-dancing sage development Emacs environment. As always,
> you can get it from http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode. But now...
> it's in the optio
17 matches
Mail list logo