[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-18 Thread David Roe
Fixes the issues I was having. Thanks! David On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Nick Alexander wrote: > > > If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have > > some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release > > a 0.6.1 sometime soon. > > Hi David and ot

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-17 Thread Nick Alexander
> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have > some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release > a 0.6.1 sometime soon. Hi David and other pyrex developers, http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=sage-mode-0.6-dr.spkg o

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-16 Thread Nick Alexander
> Speaking of C-c C-j: could it be made to jump to the next sage prompt > if not currently on one? > > Also (since you requested feature requests): I am still dreaming of a > variant of C-c C-j which would send all the doctests from the top of > the file down to the current point. C-u C-c C-j sho

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-16 Thread Nick Alexander
On 16-May-09, at 1:54 AM, dagss wrote: > > On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander wrote: >> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have >> some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to >> release >> a 0.6.1 sometime soon. > > Is there a reason you are not us

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-16 Thread dagss
On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander wrote: > If you remember, please let me know that everything's good.  I have   > some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release   > a 0.6.1 sometime soon. Is there a reason you are not using the cython-mode which ships with Cython? (In the

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-16 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:57:53PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > Hmm. What is M-; bound to for you? For me, it's `comment-dwim', > which is the greatest thing since sliced bread -- it really does do > what I mean! In a docstring, if you're on a line with non-comment > text, it adds a com

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-15 Thread Nick Alexander
> Oops, I mean C-q C-i Hmm. What is M-; bound to for you? For me, it's `comment-dwim', which is the greatest thing since sliced bread -- it really does do what I mean! In a docstring, if you're on a line with non-comment text, it adds a comment to the end of the line. Save for the space

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-15 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
> > Here is my use case. I > > like to have comments in my tests neatly aligned: > > > > sage: foo # todo: ... > > sage: bar # done! > > sage: ... # blah > > > > Since is not available for this in docstrings, I took the (bad) > > habit of usi

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-15 Thread Nick Alexander
> Hmm, probably my reason for having tabs is bad, and should be fixed in > the first place by having the right feature. Yes, this is not a good use for tabs :) > Here is my use case. I > like to have comments in my tests neatly aligned: > > sage: foo # todo: ... > sage: ba

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56:53PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > >>> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers > >>> automatic completion: > >> > >>

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-13 Thread Nick Alexander
On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: >>> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers >>> automatic completion: >> >> As far as I'm concerned, tabs in input are always wrong. Python even >>

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-13 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > > - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers > > automatic completion: > > As far as I'm concerned, tabs in input are always wrong. Python even > has an error (TabError) for this, no? This is wontfix f

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-12 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 12 May 2009 at 05:05PM -0700, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes, > depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much > like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great > to edit the doctest

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-12 Thread Nick Alexander
> Yippee! All of those are serious time savers! Thanks! > >> Beta testers, please let me know what problems you have. >> I felt like I added a lot of requested features this iteration, so >> keep them coming. > > I will :-) > > An to start with: > > - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the i

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-12 Thread Jason Grout
Jason Grout wrote: > Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: >> >> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes, >>depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much >>like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great >>to edit the doctests in

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-12 Thread Jason Grout
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > > - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes, >depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much >like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great >to edit the doctests in rst-mode and the code

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-12 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:32PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > > I am pleased to announce the release of sage-mode-0.6, the all- > singing, all-dancing sage development Emacs environment. As always, > you can get it from http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode. But now... > it's in the optio