I like 3. It probably makes the most sense because its the behavior is
simplest to define/remember, and (in)equality is by far the most
important anyway.
On Jul 16, 2:44 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 13, 1:57 pm, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I see. Yes I agree
On Jul 13, 1:57 pm, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see. Yes I agree it should be false. Consider:
>
> CIF(RIF(0)) != CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
> True
>
> RIF(0, 0) != RIF(-1, 1)
> False
>
> That these two comparisons should be different makes no sense, does
> it?
Yes, there's probably a bug her
I see. Yes I agree it should be false. Consider:
CIF(RIF(0)) != CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
True
RIF(0, 0) != RIF(-1, 1)
False
That these two comparisons should be different makes no sense, does
it?
Also why is it that CIF(0) seems to not have an interval, while CIF(1)
does?
On Jul 13, 4:35 pm, Nick Al
On 13-Jul-08, at 12:17 PM, saucerful wrote:
>
> Some weird behavior in ComplexIntervalField:
>
>
CIF(-1, 1) isn't what you think it is:
sage: CIF(-1, 1)
[-1. .. -1.] + [1. ..
1.]*I
You meant:
sage: CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
[-1.
