On Apr 14, 11:56 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 13, 6:51 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:55 AM, gerhard wrote:
>
> > > just to get back to the original question:
> > > did 'inserting a usepackage{}' command ever get resolved?
>
> > No. Somebody should at least create a t
On Apr 13, 6:51 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:55 AM, gerhard wrote:
>
> > just to get back to the original question:
> > did 'inserting a usepackage{}' command ever get resolved?
>
> No. Somebody should at least create a trac ticket.
I don't think anybody did, so here
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 at 11:46PM -0700, Bill Hart wrote:
> Is there anyone else reading the thread who thinks they might be
> interested? Any reasons why this is a really bad idea?
I'm a bit late to this party, but I wanted to say that I'm definitely
interested in this idea. It reminds me of a Sage-
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Bill Hart wrote:
>> Hold that thought Rob. I'm not joking around. If you have been a
>> significant contributor to this sort of thing, you sound like exactly
>> the sort of person to have contributing to and working on such an
>> enterprise.
Bill Hart wrote:
> Hold that thought Rob. I'm not joking around. If you have been a
> significant contributor to this sort of thing, you sound like exactly
> the sort of person to have contributing to and working on such an
> enterprise.
>
> This is so easy to get going it isn't funny. We could s
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:55 AM, gerhard wrote:
>
> just to get back to the original question:
> did 'inserting a usepackage{}' command ever get resolved?
No. Somebody should at least create a trac ticket.
> It would be nice to be able to do this from the worksheet,
> rather than modifying sag
just to get back to the original question:
did 'inserting a usepackage{}' command ever get resolved?
It would be nice to be able to do this from the worksheet,
rather than modifying sage code.
I also wonder if packages like tikz could be made to work?
-gerhard
--~--~-~--~~---
Hi Bill,
> If I do decide to go ahead with it, would you be interested
> in being involved?
Definitely. Especially if it grows organically.
> nearly all old computer systems and virtually any old game
> can be made to run on it regardless of what games machine it was
> written for!!
Yes, I'd
Excellent! I had hoped you would like it. It would probably be
pointless if you weren't on board.
Bill.
On 12 Apr, 09:26, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
> > I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically:
>
> > * It is tied to the Sag
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically:
>
> * It is tied to the Sage Python library
> * It is intended for people who have a complementary publication in a
> traditional journal
> * The code has to be included in Sage and
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Hold that thought Rob. I'm not joking around. If you have been a
> significant contributor to this sort of thing, you sound like exactly
> the sort of person to have contributing to and working on such an
> enterprise.
>
> This is so easy to
On 12 Apr, 07:24, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Maintaining version x.y.z of the
> necessary software is a very interesting idea, though I'd guess maybe
> at some point the lifetime of hardware might end up being a limiting
> factor?
If you think about computer games, there is now a project which
em
Hold that thought Rob. I'm not joking around. If you have been a
significant contributor to this sort of thing, you sound like exactly
the sort of person to have contributing to and working on such an
enterprise.
This is so easy to get going it isn't funny. We could simply start
with a website wh
Hi Bill,
Well, I really was just joking around about the "distinguished"
bit. ;-)
You've got some great points. Maintaining version x.y.z of the
necessary software is a very interesting idea, though I'd guess maybe
at some point the lifetime of hardware might end up being a limiting
factor?
I
I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically:
* It is tied to the Sage Python library
* It is intended for people who have a complementary publication in a
traditional journal
* The code has to be included in Sage and be maintained there
* The board of editors consists of Sage devel
Hi Bill,
That all sounds great. But first you'll have to find somebody
"distinguished." ;-)
Seriously, I see no real reason there can't be interactive research
articles, interactive textbooks and interactive classroom
demonstrations, all with the power of Sage right at the fingertips of
the re
Thanks Rob. It is great to see I am not the only person who has gotten
excited. This idea is s good I am having trouble finding a reason
to not Just Do It TM.
I know there is a Sage Journal idea floated (JSage). So some of what I
am thinking is surely motivated by that. Here is what I envisio
Hi Bill,
Grab the worksheet at
http://buzzard.ups.edu/sage/sage-group-theory-primer.sws
for an example of an interactive SagePaper (tm). There should even be
an @interact cell that will build a nicely formatted table of the
subgroups of a finite cyclic group, given the order of the group.
On
Another suggestion. Has anyone thought about having SagePapers TM,
which would be an arxiv of both technical mathematical papers and
expository notes written entirely in Sage worksheets?
This would be really cool, as it would allow the reader of the paper
to play with the Sage/GP/Magma/whatever e
Ah, silly me. The "evaluate" goes away when another cell is selected.
No need to worry about solving that "problem".
By the way, how do I use the %latex mode in a cell? It looks like it
expects whatever you would have in a latex slide. But
$2+2$
for example does not latex.
Bill.
On 12 Apr, 00
It doesn't seem to be imported by default. There's no other diagram
package imported by default is there?
I guess it would be even better to be able to do CD's outside cells,
but would I be correct in thinking that is a limitation of jsMath, not
the notebook?
I'm really impressed by the notebook
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Is there a way to latex using amscd for commutative diagrams in the
> notebook? This would be an extremely useful feature.
>
> I guess one is limited by the latex features that are available in a
> webpage.
>
One option is to at least use %la
22 matches
Mail list logo
