On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Fredrik Johansson
> wrote:
>> 30 times sounds plausible. Part of the reason is that mpmath doesn't
>> use the Euler-Maclaurin formula (I presume PARI does), thus requiring
>> more exponentials, and part is
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> 30 times sounds plausible. Part of the reason is that mpmath doesn't
> use the Euler-Maclaurin formula (I presume PARI does), thus requiring
> more exponentials, and part is the speed of the exponential function.
> The former can obviou
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Nick Alexander
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13-Apr-09, at 8:08 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>>
Actually, it's not using fast_callable yet, but I do plan on changing
that (which should make things much fa
Also a typo you probably already caught: Quadratic residues has same
function call as quadratic nonresidues.
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 13-Apr-09, at 8:08 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>>
>>> Actually, it's not using fast_callable yet, but I do plan on changing
>>> that (which should make things much faster). As for the zeta
>>> function--is mpmath faster than pari? (I
On 13-Apr-09, at 8:08 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> Actually, it's not using fast_callable yet, but I do plan on changing
>> that (which should make things much faster). As for the zeta
>> function--is mpmath faster than pari? (If so, should we be using it
>> for zeta in general?)
>
> Probably n
> Actually, it's not using fast_callable yet, but I do plan on changing
> that (which should make things much faster). As for the zeta
> function--is mpmath faster than pari? (If so, should we be using it
> for zeta in general?)
Probably not (yet). I just didn't know that Pari can do such nice gr
On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:41 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 13, 1:26 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, mark mcclure
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted
here:
http://w
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, mark mcclure wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
>>> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
>>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
>>
>> Very nice, but th
On Apr 13, 1:26 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, mark mcclure wrote:
>
> > On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
> >> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
>
> > Very nice, but the complex_p
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, mark mcclure wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
>
> Very nice, but the complex_plot example doesn't work with my sage 3.4
> - the
> sa
On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
Very nice, but the complex_plot example doesn't work with my sage 3.4
- the
same version that is indicated on the card. I found Robert Bradshaw'
On Apr 13, 12:41 pm, John Cremona wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Pat LeSmithe :
>
>
>
> > jinvariant ?
>
> What Pat means is: in E.j_invariant(), the underscore is lost and the
> following i is a subscript. Perhaps a "\" i missing?
Yes, it is a typo. William marked it such in the copy I have lying
next
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
>
> jinvariant ?
>
> Previously, I added direct download links to the quickref page, mainly
> to save time but also to avoid an apparent plug-in-related browser crash
> (32-bit Firefox 3.0.8 on Linux). The direct links may be more likely to
2009/4/13 Pat LeSmithe :
>
>
> jinvariant ?
>
What Pat means is: in E.j_invariant(), the underscore is lost and the
following i is a subscript. Perhaps a "\" i missing?
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
jinvariant ?
Previously, I added direct download links to the quickref page, mainly
to save time but also to avoid an apparent plug-in-related browser crash
(32-bit Firefox 3.0.8 on Linux). The direct links may be more likely to
break, though.
Should the quickrefs be part of the Sage distribut
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 13, 11:25 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>> > Maybe someone should make one about "finite element methods" using Python.
>>
>> I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I made an "Elementa
On Apr 13, 11:25 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > Maybe someone should make one about "finite element methods" using Python.
>
> I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for me now:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/
>
> and disenta
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
> >>
> >> http://wik
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
>>
>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
>
> All those quickrefs look good. It's a nice idea.
>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here:
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref
All those quickrefs look good. It's a nice idea.
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
23 matches
Mail list logo
