Miguel, can you add the project to the wiki page (or tell me the
information here), even if it is not fully prepared? It will help increase
our chances of being selected for GSoC again.
For everyone, there is a new 90 hour option for GSoC project lengths this
year.
Best,
Travis
On Monday, Feb
On Sunday, February 11, 2024 at 7:10:59 AM UTC-8 mmarco wrote:
if i understand what you mean correctly, 1) would go along making it easier
from the sage part to implement tactics like polyrith (which right now
calls the sagecell server to prove equalities between expressions using
groebner basi
So, if i understand what you mean correctly, 1) would go along making it
easier from the sage part to implement tactics like polyrith (which right
now calls the sagecell server to prove equalities between expressions using
groebner basis)?
That sounds very nice. In particular I would like to n
Hi Miguel,
There's of course a large scope of work that can be meaningful. I'll just
mention two directions, but I'll be happy to have a broader and/or more
detailed conversation.
1. For interactive proof assistants/theorem provers such as LEAN, it can be
powerful to make CAS capabilities availa
One question, Matthias: I see that you have proposed a project involving
integration with proof assistants/theorem provers. Just out of curiosity:
how do you envision such integration?
El martes, 6 de febrero de 2024 a las 6:56:44 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe
escribió:
> Great, thanks a lot, Travis
Great, thanks a lot, Travis, also for taking on the role of the GSoC admin
for another year!
On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 9:55:25 PM UTC-8 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>I have submitted the application.
>
> However, we can continue to add projects (and mentors) at any point. So i
Hi everyone,
I have submitted the application.
However, we can continue to add projects (and mentors) at any point. So if
you are interested or have any features that you want to request, please
either add it to the wiki page, post it here, or email me.
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, February 6,
Hi Linden,
Thank you. I added the project at the "standard" length 350 hours.
Best,
Travis
On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 7:24:38 PM UTC+9 Linden Disney wrote:
> I have a proposal for a project I would be willing to mentor (detailed
> below for completeness), but I'm unsure about how best to
I have a proposal for a project I would be willing to mentor (detailed
below for completeness), but I'm unsure about how best to estimate the
length (I did GSoC 2021 but estimates of length weren't around then). The
initial coding would not be too challenging, but the mathematical research
whic
I have added it. (For reference on editing the pages, you login using your
trac credentials from the upper left corner.)
Best,
Travis
On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:38:52 AM UTC+9 Martin R wrote:
> I would like to propose the exact same project I had for last year again,
> but I am currentl
I would like to propose the exact same project I had for last year again,
but I am currently at a conference and additionally don't see how I could
edit the page.
Martin
On Sunday 4 February 2024 at 05:19:17 UTC+1 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple messages.
>
> For potential men
Sorry for the multiple messages.
For potential mentors, there is no commitment required at this time.
You can also decide later to add a project and/or be a mentor.
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 1:17:54 PM UTC+9 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> For the potential projects, you can either
For the potential projects, you can either edit the corresponding wiki page
in Matthias's link or directly post them here (you do not need to be the
mentor).
Also, I would like to have a list of potential mentors. Any SageMath
developer can be a mentor for a GSoC project; so if you are willing
Thank you for doing that. I updated my projects and removed all of those
with named mentors as they have not agreed at present (AFAIK) to be a
potential mentor.
I was expecting to be the main administrator for GSoC again this year. We
will discuss this on the mentors list.
For the proposal, wh
Sir ,
I did not get the question. Can you explain it again?
I think you are asking why hyperplane
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 12:24:27 AM UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote:
>
> Ops, i didn't see that.
>
> One question, what is the reason for defining a specific class for these
> algebras instead of
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:54:27 PM UTC-6, mmarco wrote:
>
> Ops, i didn't see that.
>
> One question, what is the reason for defining a specific class for these
> algebras instead of using any of the already available constructions
> (g-algebra quotient, GCDA...)
>
>
By being a com
Ops, i didn't see that.
One question, what is the reason for defining a specific class for these
algebras instead of using any of the already available constructions
(g-algebra quotient, GCDA...)
El martes, 16 de febrero de 2016, 17:49:03 (UTC+1), Travis Scrimshaw
escribió:
>
>
> *Hyper-plane
The first reference I would recommend you about hyperplane arrangements is
this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Arrangements-Hyperplanes-Grundlehren-mathematischen-Wissenschaften/dp/3540552596/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208252764&sr=1-1
El martes, 16 de febrero de 2016, 17:49:03 (UTC+1), Trav
> *Hyper-plane arrangement*
>
> I would like to know more about the current situation of Hyperplane
> arragement in sage and
> how about The Orlik–Solomon algebra and The intersection semilattice and
> the matroid with hyperplane arragement?
> If there are any kind of references please let me
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> I noticed that (as guessed) the Python Software Foundation was selected
> as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code. There aren't any
> Sage ideas up on the idea page:
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2009
>
> If we ar
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> > ... but I think the canvas back end has a
> > decent chance of being funded.
>
> Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
> proposal for Sage as a mentor group.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Harald Schilly wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>> ... but I think the canvas back end has a
>>> decent chance of being funded.
>>
>> Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
>> proposal for Sage as a mentor
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> Based upon a lot of the comments in recent weeks, improvements
> in plotting is a good idea. I recommend a canvas matplotlib
> back end. This would greatly benefit the notebook and would
> benefit the matplotlib project as well.
+1
>
> Of c
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> ... but I think the canvas back end has a
>> decent chance of being funded.
>
> Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
> proposal for Sage as a mentor group. Therefore it should focus on such
> tasks that
On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> ... but I think the canvas back end has a
> decent chance of being funded.
Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
proposal for Sage as a mentor group. Therefore it should focus on such
tasks that have no maths background and avera
Based upon a lot of the comments in recent weeks, improvements
in plotting is a good idea. I recommend a canvas matplotlib
back end. This would greatly benefit the notebook and would
benefit the matplotlib project as well.
Of course, I'd prefer improvements to pynac based integration,
limits, and
On Mar 9, 3:04 am, davidp wrote:
> and I have a student that would love to work with me this summer to
> really polish it up. (A preliminary version of a sandpile applet he
> wrote is atwww.reed.edu/~headb/sandpiles.) It might not be what
> Google is looking for, though.
There are two differ
I have been working on a Sage package for the Abelian Sandpile Model:
http://people.reed.edu/~davidp/412/
and I have a student that would love to work with me this summer to
really polish it up. (A preliminary version of a sandpile applet he
wrote is at www.reed.edu/~headb/sandpiles.) It might
>
> +10
>
> This is why I copied the notebook section as an example from the list
> for 2008. Even though I would expect Google to be interested in funding
> open source implementations of maths, I think it would be better if we
> focus on the computer science/engineering side of things.
>
> I
Hi,
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:08:22 +0100
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> We should still prepare the application ASAP, of course. :)
>
> Please submit ideas to the wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/gsoc09
>
>
> I'll also start a wiki page for the questions we need to address as a
> part of the ap
Hi William,
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 06:46:17 -0700
William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are we doing anything for the Google Summer of Code this year?
>
> I hope so. Note that I'm personally not going to fill out a mentor
> organizat
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 06:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 12:50 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > Are we doing anything for the Google Summer of Code this year?
>
> I hope - from the experience in the past - the main focus is on non-
> maths related tasks, that are "easy" and com
On Mar 8, 12:50 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Are we doing anything for the Google Summer of Code this year?
I hope - from the experience in the past - the main focus is on non-
maths related tasks, that are "easy" and comprehensible from a
software engineering standpoint. i.e. authentication with
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are we doing anything for the Google Summer of Code this year?
I hope so. Note that I'm personally not going to fill out a mentor
organization application for Sage. If you or somebody else wants to,
volunteer now. After receivi
On Feb 26, 8:04 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should work on a wiki page with project ideas (assuming that Sage
> will be accepted for SoC).
+1 see http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoCSuggestions
> --Mike
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To p
We should work on a wiki page with project ideas (assuming that Sage
will be accepted for SoC).
--Mike
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 6:45 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/2
On Feb 26, 6:45 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/26/0134235
>
> Sage totally needs to get in on this! I figure Sage is far more worthy
> than, say, Irssi [1]. :)
:)
We are on it - but input is always welcome.
Cheers,
Michael
> Da
On 3/15/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a pity! Why we didn't give Guido van Rossum a call!
> I think he is very much interested in SAGE and mathematical software in
> general.
> As is Tim Peters.
>
> > They make it very difficult to tell, I had some weird problems
> > submitt
Hi William,
>>> William Stein wrote:
>>>
FYI I just filled out the Google Summer of Code "Mentor Organization"
application for SAGE, to see if Google will give us some support.
So (1) nobody else do the same thing, and (2) no further discussion about
GSoC is needed unless we
On 3/15/07, Pere Urbón-Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El dj 15 de 03 del 2007 a les 17:25 +0100, en/na Jaap Spies va escriure:
> > William Stein wrote:
> >
> > > FYI I just filled out the Google Summer of Code "Mentor Organization"
> > > application for SAGE, to see if Google will give us some
El dj 15 de 03 del 2007 a les 17:25 +0100, en/na Jaap Spies va escriure:
> William Stein wrote:
>
> > FYI I just filled out the Google Summer of Code "Mentor Organization"
> > application for SAGE, to see if Google will give us some support.
> > So (1) nobody else do the same thing, and (2) no
William Stein wrote:
> FYI I just filled out the Google Summer of Code "Mentor Organization"
> application for SAGE, to see if Google will give us some support.
> So (1) nobody else do the same thing, and (2) no further discussion about
> GSoC is needed unless we get support (we'll find out in
sunshine wrote:
>
> What is GSoC?I am a student,don't know that so much.
>
I would recommmend you "google" for it ;)
Not suprisingly, the first hit is http://code.google.com/soc/
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
What is GSoC?I am a student,don't know that so much.
On 3月10日, 下午4时23分, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI I just filled out the Google Summer of Code "Mentor Organization"
> application for SAGE, to see if Google will give us some support.
> So (1) nobody else do the sam
44 matches
Mail list logo
