On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:13 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 23, 7:29 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
>
>>
>> +1, I agree, this is badly needed. We should ask maxima/sympy to
>> compute an integral when algorithm within Sage fails. That way
>> one can implement the integration algorithm within
On Jun 23, 7:29 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
> +1, I agree, this is badly needed. We should ask maxima/sympy to
> compute an integral when algorithm within Sage fails. That way
> one can implement the integration algorithm within Sage which are
> not yet implemented in maxima/sympy.
J
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:38:11 -0700
William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300
> > Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > I plan
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300
> Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
>> As you suggested, I am working with a prototype symbolic integration
>> class for hooking up my integration code using its _eval_ method. I
>> could expand the cl
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300
> Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal
>> wrote:
>> >> > I plan to move the integrate() and sum() (after #3587) constructs
>> >> > to be symbolic fu
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> >> > I plan to move the integrate() and sum() (after #3587) constructs
> >> > to be symbolic functions (i.e., subclasses of SFunction from
> >> > sage.symbolic.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> How do you include modules from a new directory in Sage? I tried
>> as you suggested but sage somehow is not finding the module.
>
>
> See sage/setup.py (search for "packages"). Put your directory in there.
>
> Also, make sure you have an _
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
I plan to move the integrate() and sum() (after #3587) constructs
to be symbolic functions (i.e., subclasses of SFunction from
sage.symbolic.function), as opposed to regular python functio
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> > I plan to move the integrate() and sum() (after #3587) constructs
>> > to be symbolic functions (i.e., subclasses of SFunction from
>> > sage.symbolic.function), as opposed to regular python functions in
>> > sage.calculus.calculus.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:29:53 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> >> I am wondering whether there is any policy/framework
> >> for hooking-up a specialized integration code as a part
> >> of integration algorithm in new symbolic?
> >
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> I am wondering whether there is any policy/framework
>> for hooking-up a specialized integration code as a part
>> of integration algorithm in new symbolic?
>
> There isn't any, yet. That should change this week though. :)
>
> I plan to mov
Hi Golam,
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:07:33 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering whether there is any policy/framework
> for hooking-up a specialized integration code as a part
> of integration algorithm in new symbolic?
There isn't any, yet. That should change this week
12 matches
Mail list logo
