> Anything skanky milling around in those "subroutine comments"?
Thank you all for your attention, but it turns out that Cholesky
decomposition can be naively computed via trivial recursions. 6
lines. Now it may not be numerically stable... but it's easy :)
Nick
--~--~-~--~~--
On Feb 19, 2009, at 21:50 , Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
> decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
>
> Nick
>
> (*
> Copyright (c) 1992-200
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander > > wrote:
>>>
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>>>
>>> The author claims it is BSD licen
On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander > wrote:
>>
>>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>>
>> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
>> naive Cholesky is a few dozen l
Nick Alexander wrote:
>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>
> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
> naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
> text book :)
Well, I think the point is that there
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>
> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
> naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
> text book :)
Just o
> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
text book :)
Thanks for the replies.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~--
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
>> decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
>>
>> Nick
>
> It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder -- precisely ho
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
> decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
>
> Nick
It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder -- precisely how
does it differ from the BSD l
