[sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-09 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Have you tried building the ssl libraries and running the self-check. All my tests passed. It could be you are using a broken compiler, so everything you create is broke. I see no errors or failures after make test 2>&1 | tee test.log But if you

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-08 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jaap Spies wrote: I'm sorry for the noise and the hassle. I found this morning (afternoon actually) that I had a 'disk full', built one sage to much :(! That explains why it failed. I would have expected some sort of error message - usually one gets one at the console. Installed your tool

[sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-08 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I've yet to get Sage to build on Open Solaris (x86/x64), though I have tried on a Sun Ultra 27 (Intel Xeon, not SPARC). I don't know the best configuration of the build tools, but have something seem as though they will allow progress to be made. In contrast Jaap seems to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Well, I can't understand this! It's crazy. I'd just decompressed it on boxen without issue. Log in there, copy it from my directory, and try it yourself! I'm going to upload the '7za' binary from my sparc there too. I think I'll resist the temptation to compress it in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I've yet to get Sage to build on Open Solaris (x86/x64), though I have tried on a Sun Ultra 27 (Intel Xeon, not SPARC). I don't know the best configuration of the build tools, but have something seem as though

[sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Can you check the md5 checksums? kir...@boxen:~/Open_Solaris_Build_Tools$ openssl md5 binutils-2.20-and-gcc-4.3.4-GNU-assembler-Sun-linker.tar.7z openssl-0.9.8l-binaries.tar.7z MD5(binutils-2.20-and-gcc-4.3.4-GNU-assembler-Sun-linker.tar.7z)= f2d

[sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I've yet to get Sage to build on Open Solaris (x86/x64), though I have tried on a Sun Ultra 27 (Intel Xeon, not SPARC). I don't know the best configuration of the build tools, but have something seem as though they will allow pr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Can you check the md5 checksums? kir...@boxen:~/Open_Solaris_Build_Tools$ openssl md5 binutils-2.20-and-gcc-4.3.4-GNU-assembler-Sun-linker.tar.7z openssl-0.9.8l-binaries.tar.7z MD5(binutils-2.20-and-gcc-4.3.4-GNU-assembler-Sun-linker.tar.7z)= f2d97f344aba52428f0a6c803

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I've yet to get Sage to build on Open Solaris (x86/x64), though I have tried on a Sun Ultra 27 (Intel Xeon, not SPARC). I don't know the best configuration of the build tools, but have something seem as though they will allow progress to be made. In con

[sage-devel] Re: Open Solaris build Tools

2010-01-07 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I've yet to get Sage to build on Open Solaris (x86/x64), though I have tried on a Sun Ultra 27 (Intel Xeon, not SPARC). I don't know the best configuration of the build tools, but have something seem as though they will allow progress to be made. In contrast Jaap seems to