Re: [sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Simon, On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Simon King wrote: > I guess David's point was that this information should be stated more > clearly in the Readme text. See ticket #7565 [1] for a newer README.txt file. I hope the newer README.txt is much clearer about the concern David raised. [1]

[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Jaap Spies
Simon King wrote: > Hi Minh > > On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen wrote: > >> My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build >> Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory. >> After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up >> Sage a

[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Jaap Spies
Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby wrote: >> I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10 >> 03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the >> latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different >> lo

[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Simon King
Hi Minh On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen wrote: ... > My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build > Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory. > After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up > Sage as root at least once before you