On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Golam Mortuza Hossain
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Carlo Hamalainen
> wrote:
>> but I get a doctest failure on calculus.py. The first time
>> I ran sage -testall I saw this:
>>
>>
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py"
>> *** *** Error: T
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Carlo Hamalainen
wrote:
> but I get a doctest failure on calculus.py. The first time
> I ran sage -testall I saw this:
>
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py"
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! PROCESS KILLED! *** ***
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! *** ***
> **
Hi,
I built 3.4.1.rc1 on my Asus EEE PC 1000H (Intel Atom). The previous
issue with gmp-mpir not compiling has been fixed (thanks to Bill Hart
and others) but I get a doctest failure on calculus.py. The first time
I ran sage -testall I saw this:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py"
*
Built from source and passes all tests with sage -t with 64-bit
Kubuntu 8.10 on Intel dual core.
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googl
On Apr 7, 10:11 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> Hi, Michael,
Hi Justin,
> > That one is fixed. I am surprised you did not get the mosky failure,
> > but I suspected if you did a -ba you would hit it.
>
> Ha! I just (well, a while back) did './sage -ba' and then
> ./sage -t devel/sage
Hi, Michael,
On Apr 7, 2009, at 17:40 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 7, 3:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
>>> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on
>>> OSX
>>> unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
>> [snip]
>>> You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 b
On Apr 7, 5:37 pm, Alex Ghitza wrote:
Hi Alex,
> I upgraded from rc0 on four different machines running 32-bit
> Archlinux. Testing fails on three files:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
See the comment about that regarding Jaap which had the same problem.
Th
On Apr 7, 3:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi Justin,
> > here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> > unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
> [snip]
> > You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
>
> > ./sage
> > -upgradehttp://sage.math
I upgraded from rc0 on four different machines running 32-bit
Archlinux. Testing fails on three files:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/combinat/words/words.py"
On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
[snip]
> You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
>
> ./sage -upgrade
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/sage-3.4.1.rc1/
>
> S
William Stein wrote:
>
> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py"
> **
> File
> "/Users/was/build/sage-3.4.1.rc1/devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py",
> line 1562:
>
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> unlike 3.4.1.rc0. I also merged a couple other patches I had wanted in
> 3.4.1, but had barely missed rc0. Note that due to 3.4.1 having taken
> nearly a months the
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:56 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Built fine on 64-bit Suse linux; one test failed the first time and
> then passed:
>
> The following tests failed:
>
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py"
> Total time for all tests: 2846.3 seconds
> Please see /home/jec
Built fine on 64-bit Suse linux; one test failed the first time and
then passed:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py"
Total time for all tests: 2846.3 seconds
Please see /home/jec/sage-3.4.1.rc1/tmp/test.log for the complete log
from this test.
j..
14 matches
Mail list logo
