[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-26 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: >> mabshoff wrote: >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> here goes 3.4.2.alpha0. It does not contain all the fixes I wanted, >>> but I merged two large (200kb+) patches (#5610 and #5848) that touched >>> a lot of files and that were in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-26 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Apr 25, 2009, at 19:37 , mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Apr 25, 7:30 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > Hi, > >> Builds from scratch fine on OSX.4 on PPC G4. I do have a couple >> random things which came out of it, but I assume these are known - >> just in case, I post them: >> >> 1. I get this error mes

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 7:30 pm, kcrisman wrote: Hi, > Builds from scratch fine on OSX.4 on PPC G4.  I do have a couple > random things which came out of it, but I assume these are known - > just in case, I post them: > > 1. I get this error message during the Sphinx run: > > docstring of > sage.schemes.e

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-25 Thread kcrisman
Builds from scratch fine on OSX.4 on PPC G4. I do have a couple random things which came out of it, but I assume these are known - just in case, I post them: 1. I get this error message during the Sphinx run: docstring of sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_rational_field.EllipticCurve_rational_fi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 5:53 am, David Joyner wrote: Hi David, > Wow! I have stunning news (for me anyway): > > This compiles perfectly *and passes all tests* on ubuntu 64bit 8.10 > with a phenom chip. Well, give the trouble you have seen in the past with your specific setup this clearly indicates clisp si

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-25 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Apr 24, 2009, at 03:07 , mabshoff wrote: > here goes 3.4.2.alpha0. It does not contain all the fixes I wanted, > but I merged two large (200kb+) patches (#5610 and #5848) that touched > a lot of files and that were in danger of bitrotting. Since I > considered it pointless to force people to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-25 Thread David Joyner
Wow! I have stunning news (for me anyway): This compiles perfectly *and passes all tests* on ubuntu 64bit 8.10 with a phenom chip. This is the first time that has happened in more releases than I can remember! Great job to everyone involed, which definitely includes Michael Abshoff. On Fri, A

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-24 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: [...] > > Can *you* reproduce it repeatedly? > One again: [j...@paix sage-3.4.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_symbolic_dense.pyx" sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_symbolic_dense.pyx" *

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-24 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> here goes 3.4.2.alpha0. It does not contain all the fixes I wanted, >> but I merged two large (200kb+) patches (#5610 and #5848) that touched >> a lot of files and that were in danger of bitrotting. Since

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-24 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.4.2.alpha0. It does not contain all the fixes I wanted, > but I merged two large (200kb+) patches (#5610 and #5848) that touched > a lot of files and that were in danger of bitrotting. Since I > considered it pointless to force people to rebase poten

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 released!

2009-04-24 Thread John Cremona
Successful build from source and all tests pass on both Suse 32-bit and Ubuntu 64-bit. John 2009/4/24 mabshoff : > > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.4.2.alpha0. It does not contain all the fixes I wanted, > but I merged two large (200kb+) patches (#5610 and #5848) that touched > a lot of files and