On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:26 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 16, 2:41 am, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On May 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
>
>
>> Of course, philosophical discussions on the merit of GNU/the GPL
>> belong on sage-flame, to try and keep sage-devel about mor
On May 16, 2:41 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
> Of course, philosophical discussions on the merit of GNU/the GPL
> belong on sage-flame, to try and keep sage-devel about more
> development related stuff.
+1 - maybe we need a sage-gpl
On May 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Why not call GNU/Sage :) Still, I cannot understand why they insist
> the name GNU/Linux. There is another software distribution based on
> Solaris Kernel which they call it Nexenta. http://www.nexenta.org/os .
> There are many more softw
Why not call GNU/Sage :) Still, I cannot understand why they insist
the name GNU/Linux. There is another software distribution based on
Solaris Kernel which they call it Nexenta. http://www.nexenta.org/os .
There are many more software that are not labeled with the name GNU,
but they feel they sho
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Antonio Cárdenas wrote:
> Hi Professor Stein,
>
> I like Sage, it is a great project. I sent an email to the FSF about listing
> it in the high priority list:
> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority.html
Thanks!
> They agree that Sage is a great and necessary pr
