Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_S
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
wh
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
wh
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
whe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
>From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
when building Python
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
David,
I don't know how important #6583 it so Sage, or how important William
sees a Solaris port as important, but at the minute, these two
appear to be
mutually exclusive.
I don't know if I agree with that. Have you tried tinkering with the
build
