On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Ticket #6580 [1] is meant to have ratpoints build with GCC 3.4.x. The
>>> Sage build farm u
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Ticket #6580 [1] is meant to have ratpoints build with GCC 3.4.x. The
>> Sage build farm uses GCC >= 4.0.1 and ticket #7021 [2] has the updated
>> package prereq-
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
>>>
> Just to add that even the very latest release of Solaris (Solaris 10
> update 7) on SPARC only ships with gcc 3.
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>
Just to add that even the very latest release of Solaris (Solaris 10
update 7) on SPARC only ships with gcc 3.4.3. Users using SPARC
hardware are unlikely to have root acc
No FLINT only requires C99, so 3.4.3 is fine I believe.
I think FLINT 2 will drop the C99 requirement as it is a damned pain
in the neck, as MSVC is no C99 compliant. Probably by the time I get
FLINT 2 release they'll release MSVC 2010 and spring C99 compliance on
us, only 11 years after the stan
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Just to add that even the very latest release of Solaris (Solaris 10
>>> update 7) on SPARC only ships with gcc 3.4.3. Users using SPARC
>>> hardware are unlikely to have root access as it tends not to be us
William Stein wrote:
>> Just to add that even the very latest release of Solaris (Solaris 10
>> update 7) on SPARC only ships with gcc 3.4.3. Users using SPARC
>> hardware are unlikely to have root access as it tends not to be used by
>> home users too much (yours truly is a bit of an exception
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> FOR supporting 3.4.x:
>>
>> [ ] It probably would be easy at this point, since it just means
>> fixing ratpoints.
>>
>> [ ] This reminds me of when w
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> The packages you have updated so far all contain a similar set of
> tests at the start of the file spkg-install. To me, those tests look
> very much like a template to be used for perhaps all the other spkg's.
> It would be very beneficial to package maintainers if those boil
Hi David,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> The fact is the Sun linker seems better than the GNU one. The problem is
> that some code sends GNU-specific options to the Sun linker, which
> fails. However, I believe I have sorted all them out in Sage as long as
> gcc i
Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>> However, I thought someone said once that Flint also needed a 4.x
>> I don't know about that. Better check with Bill Hart on the minimum
>> version of GCC for compiling FLINT.
>
> I was able to compile gcc 4.2.4 on
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> However, I thought someone said once that Flint also needed a 4.x
>
> I don't know about that. Better check with Bill Hart on the minimum
> version of GCC for compiling FLINT.
I was able to compile gcc 4.2.4 on Solaris 10 x86 but had no luck
Hi David,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Just to add that even the very latest release of Solaris (Solaris 10
> update 7) on SPARC only ships with gcc 3.4.3. Users using SPARC
> hardware are unlikely to have root access as it tends not to be used by
> home users
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> FOR supporting 3.4.x:
>
> [ ] It probably would be easy at this point, since it just means
> fixing ratpoints.
>
> [ ] This reminds me of when we dumped support for Cygwin in 2007.
> In retrospect allowing that w
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Ticket #6580 [1] is meant to have ratpoints build with GCC 3.4.x. The
> Sage build farm uses GCC >= 4.0.1 and ticket #7021 [2] has the updated
> package prereq-0.4 which checks that the target platform has GCC >=
> 4.0.1. With
15 matches
Mail list logo
