On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:28 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
>>
>> -1 - the will only cause more li
To quote U.S. copyright law, section 107:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use
of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or
phonorecords, or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, ne
While we are discussing licenses, I thought I would point out that the
Sage wiki very prominently says "By making an explicit contribution to
the Sage wiki (or the Sage documentation), one certifies that one's
contribution is licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 license."
(I don't know about im
