> > > It will be especially interesting to see this working on 10.4 and
> > > 10.6, and on 10.5 intel. And on 64bit.
> For 10.4 you can install the bundle provided onhttp://r.research.att.com/,
> as we discussed in this thread, and I thought
> I pointed it out that that 10.4-specific bundle (10.4u
On Sep 13, 10:45 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Sep 12, 4:26 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > OK, here
> > goes:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/patches/gfortran-macosx.tgz
> > Instructions are included.
> > To apply patches, follow instructions
> > onhttp://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk
On Sep 12, 4:26 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> OK, here
> goes:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/patches/gfortran-macosx.tgz
> Instructions are included.
> To apply patches, follow instructions
> onhttp://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#reviewing-patches...
>
> I tested that
On 12 September 2010 10:29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 12, 5:14 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 12 September 2010 10:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> > Dave,
>> > this is meant to be MacOSX-specific, for testing of the concept.
>> > If this flies on 10.x for x!=5, with hardware not necessar
OK, after updating one of the patches I posted (the numpy one), all
tests pass for me!
(must be testlong for my slow machine :))
I added the update here:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/patches/gfortran-macosx.tgz
Dima
On Sep 12, 4:26 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> OK, here
> goes:http
On Sep 12, 5:14 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 12 September 2010 10:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > Dave,
> > this is meant to be MacOSX-specific, for testing of the concept.
> > If this flies on 10.x for x!=5, with hardware not necessarily PPC,
> > then we are in business
> > and can go this way
On 12 September 2010 10:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Dave,
> this is meant to be MacOSX-specific, for testing of the concept.
> If this flies on 10.x for x!=5, with hardware not necessarily PPC,
> then we are in business
> and can go this way.
>
> Dima
But the point is the SAGE_FORTRAN variable is
Dave,
this is meant to be MacOSX-specific, for testing of the concept.
If this flies on 10.x for x!=5, with hardware not necessarily PPC,
then we are in business
and can go this way.
Dima
On Sep 12, 4:35 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 12 September 2010 08:33, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Se
On 12 September 2010 08:33, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2:38 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> I got stuck at scipy:
>>
>
> I have fixed this by making changes in numpy's patch for gnu.py.
> The complete build of Sage-4.5.3.has successfully finished now.
> I'll post the necessary patched, a
OK, here goes:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/patches/gfortran-macosx.tgz
Instructions are included.
To apply patches, follow instructions on
http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#reviewing-patches-with-queues
I tested that is builds Sage 4.5.3 on MacOSX 10.5 ppc (32 bit,
On Sep 12, 2:38 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I got stuck at scipy:
>
I have fixed this by making changes in numpy's patch for gnu.py.
The complete build of Sage-4.5.3.has successfully finished now.
I'll post the necessary patched, and the test results, shortly.
> In the log below, the line begi
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't
>> build
>> ATLAS on OS X?
>
> No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
>
>> > One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
>>
> Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't build
> ATLAS on OS X?
No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
> > One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
> > xcode? So I would just ship gfortran binary that is compatib
On 09/12/10 01:07 AM, kcrisman wrote:
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima d
> > a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
> > it's not standard at all imho)
>
> Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
>
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima demonstrates, with OS X
10.4, so
I got stuck at scipy:
In the log below, the line beginning with
"sage_fortran -Wall -shared -Wall -shared -undefined dynamic_lookup -
bundle..."
definitely looks weird, as -shared option should not be there...
(I must also say that the error message looks weird, too, as there is
no option -dynamic
On Sep 10, 2:31 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sep 11, 1:31 am, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Buthttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42provideshttp://r.research.att.c...
> > > which will do the installation of "10.4u", whatever this means,
>
> > Yeah, I'm not sure what this is either,
>
> > > App
On Sep 11, 1:31 am, kcrisman wrote:
> > Buthttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42provideshttp://r.research.att.c...
> > which will do the installation of "10.4u", whatever this means,
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure what this is either,
>
> > Apple's SDK with gcc42 and gfortran42.
>
> > So yes, it's the
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:31 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Buthttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42provideshttp://
r.research.att.com/tools/gcc-4.2-5566-darwin8-all.tar.gz
which will do the installation of "10.4u", whatever this means,
Yeah, I'm not sure what this is either,
I'll guess: 10.4 "univer
> Buthttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42provideshttp://r.research.att.com/tools/gcc-4.2-5566-darwin8-all.tar.gz
> which will do the installation of "10.4u", whatever this means,
Yeah, I'm not sure what this is either,
> Apple's SDK with gcc42 and gfortran42.
>
> So yes, it's the missing gcc42
On Sep 10, 10:38 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Sep 10, 9:34 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 10, 8:53 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 10, 2:36 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > > > After some trial and error, I came
> > > > acrosshttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42
>
> > > I men
> But, as I said, gfortran integrated with Xcode's gcc is available
> athttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42, so there is really
> no point in having g95 in Sage at all!
Right, *if* it's easy to get this to play along with existing Xcode
installations. If Sage can somehow detect this situatio
On Sep 10, 9:34 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sep 10, 8:53 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > On Sep 10, 2:36 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > > After some trial and error, I came
> > > acrosshttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42
>
> > I mentioned this link in one of my (many) posts on this thread -
Dave,
On Sep 10, 6:48 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> On 09/10/10 07:36 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > So yes, it seems that g95 can be dropped this way, but this is a
> > considerable amount of work.
>
> Dima,
>
> I would not waste any time on this - the gains do not warrant much work.
indeed.
On Sep 10, 8:53 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2:36 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > After some trial and error, I came
> > acrosshttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42
>
> I mentioned this link in one of my (many) posts on this thread - sorry
> if I didn't highlight it more.
>
> > that descr
On Sep 10, 2:36 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> After some trial and error, I came
> acrosshttp://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42
I mentioned this link in one of my (many) posts on this thread - sorry
if I didn't highlight it more.
> that describes a process of building gfortran using Xcode gcc-4
On 09/10/10 07:36 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
So yes, it seems that g95 can be dropped this way, but this is a
considerable amount of work.
Dima,
I would not waste any time on this - the gains do not warrant much work.
The amount of work would decrease if we drop MacOSX 10.4 from the list
of
After some trial and error, I came across
http://r.research.att.com/tools/#gcc42
that describes a process of building gfortran using Xcode gcc-4.2
(available since Xcode release
3.1.1, at least --- current is Xcode 3.1.4 released Sept 2009).
This will work on both PPC and Intel Macs running at MacO
On Sep 9, 12:31 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I didn't build sage on my G4 since 4.3.4, and there gfortran points to
> something I got from fink.
> So I must have built Sage using fink's gfortran, built against
> gcc-4.3.4 ? Hmm.
> OK, let me try the current release and see if I get anywhere.
> (I
I didn't build sage on my G4 since 4.3.4, and there gfortran points to
something I got from fink.
So I must have built Sage using fink's gfortran, built against
gcc-4.3.4 ? Hmm.
OK, let me try the current release and see if I get anywhere.
(It will take a while...)
Dima
On Sep 9, 11:20 pm, kcrism
###
>
> 2) The next question is whether we should remove *all* code in Sage
> that make a distinction between g95 and gfortran. I propose that Sage
> still allows one to specify a Fortran compiler with SAGE_FORTRAN, but
> if that's not set, it jus
On 9 September 2010 15:33, kcrisman wrote:
>> > > William said here
>>
>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1b6235...
>>
>> > > "Probably the only platforms that get g95 are older OS X."
>>
>> > It seems like PowerPC gets it.
>>
>> Well, I run MacOSX 10.5 on my PPC
Okay, I finally figured out how to check this - I had to run the
binary directly, the scripts didn't work because of the way they're
used (since gfortran isn't in my PATH, of course):
G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007)
Dima, can you look at your $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage_fortran and tell us
what i
> Unsurprisingly, the R project has a site (http://r.research.att.com/
> tools/) with links to lots of Fortran compilers, including apparently
> one gfortran one which would work on 10.4 (?).
Though apparently one then also needs to download a newer-built Xcode
- a custom one which has gcc 4.2 (a
> > > William said here
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1b6235...
>
> > > "Probably the only platforms that get g95 are older OS X."
>
> > It seems like PowerPC gets it.
>
> Well, I run MacOSX 10.5 on my PPC (G4), and I have gfortran.
Can you give me a command
On Sep 9, 9:05 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Sep 9, 5:09 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which
> > is
> > an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems.
>
> > According to Wikipedia
>
> >http://e
On Sep 9, 5:09 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which is
> an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems.
>
> According to Wikipedia
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G95
>
> gfortran was forked from g95 in
37 matches
Mail list logo
