> Let me know if you're interesting in refereeing this but find the
> combination of messing with the sagenb code and sage library too
> daunting.
This might be an outdated comment now (in light of Fernando's reply) but
widening the gap between command line and the notebook doesn't sound like a
Hi,
Dozens of times over the years, people have complained because in Sage
symbolic variables names don't magically spring into existence, and
also about object-oriented method call notation. We have defended
this design forever, not even considering providing a non-default
optional mode what
