Just a stupid remark:
> Here's the latest list:
>
>algebraAlexGhitza
[...]
> graphicswas
> graph theoryrlm
> group_theoryjoyner
> interactitolkov
[...]
> website/wikischilly
Why group_theory vs g
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
>> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
>> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
>> > I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
>> >
>> > Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
>> > meaning in practice we w
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 at 10:43PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladivostok, Pekin or
> > Sidney ?
>
> We should get Dan to join. I mean: Dan Bump if Mike is still in
> Malaysia, and Dan Drake otherwise. Actually probably both :-)
I was going to men
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just
> respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
> >
> > Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
> > meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike,
> > myself, for a bet
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
>> I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
>>
>> Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
>> meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike,
>> myself, for a better 24/24 7/7
> I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
>
> Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
> meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike,
> myself, for a better 24/24 7/7 service?
Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
>> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
>> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc.
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just
> respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> While I certainly don't mind owning the notebook, I don't think I
> contribute 1% of the effort these days. I do like getting cc'd on it
> all, though.
>
I've taken over ownership of the notebook component.
William
--
To post to this grou
While I certainly don't mind owning the notebook, I don't think I
contribute 1% of the effort these days. I do like getting cc'd on it
all, though.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@goog
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:56:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
>> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like
>>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:56:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
>many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like
>to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just res
Hi,
Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that many
of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like to
suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just respond in this
thread.Don't ask me exactly what it "means" to own a component in tr
15 matches
Mail list logo
