Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:07:53AM -0700, Gary Maurizi napsal(a):
> Thank You Thank You Thank You!!
I see eactly the same enthusiasm and celebration as I did yesterday :o))
> '--disable-isc-spnego'
>
> CentOS base AND epel bind9.8 packages both compile with this, this IS/WAS
> the c
Thank You Thank You Thank You!!
'--disable-isc-spnego'
CentOS base AND epel bind9.8 packages both compile with this, this IS/WAS
the cause of my and every other samba4 CentOS 6 users issue with dynamic
DNS updates.
01. Downloading the source RPM, removing this line from the build
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:02 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 09:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > >
> > > End users need something simple to install. We also need so
Hello,
Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:16:58AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> > > 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > > > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, 2
Hello
Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 08:16:00PM -0700, Gary Maurizi napsal(a):
> I think I might have figured out something about this Centos 6.4 thing and
> BIND9_DLZ dynamic updates NOT working with the CentOS 6.4 bind package:
>
> [root@server private]# named -V
> BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 09:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > End users need something simple to install. We also need something that
> > does dynamic dns reliably. The strong point
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 17:40 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I want to thank you both so very much for your help.
>
> [root@server samba-master]# named -V
> BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4 built with
> '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
> '--target=x86_64-re
2013.06.03 01:14, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
>> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
>>> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> This is a follow up to my previous...
>
>
If you want to avoid all that just follow the DNS BIND on the wiki and compile
BIND YOURSELF. That'd save you many trouble.
I did that.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2/06/2013, at 22:16, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I think I might have figured out something about this Centos 6.4 thing and
> BIND9_DLZ
I think I might have figured out something about this Centos 6.4 thing and
BIND9_DLZ dynamic updates NOT working with the CentOS 6.4 bind package:
[root@server private]# named -V
BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4 built with
'--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gn
I want to thank you both so very much for your help.
It's another day and I'm back to it, refreshed, and determined to figure
out what is causing so many issues for the CentOS 6.4 users.
Going through the same exact steps on ubuntu 12.04 on a different machine
does give me working dynamic DNS upd
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
>
> > > Hi
> > > openSUSE 12.3
> > > This is the first time in many years where the SUSE/openSUSE bind has
> > > _almost_ worked out of th
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
> > Hi
> > openSUSE 12.3
> > This is the first time in many years where the SUSE/openSUSE bind has
> > _almost_ worked out of the box. They will not entertain non chrooted
> > installs.
>
>
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> > 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> > >>> This is a follow up to my prev
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> >>> This is a follow up to my previous...
> >>>
> >>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> >>> This is a follow up to my previous...
> >>>
> >>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I
2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
>>> This is a follow up to my previous...
>>>
>>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
>>> further debugging informa
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> > This is a follow up to my previous...
> >
> > Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
> > further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> This is a follow up to my previous...
>
> Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
> further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and whats
> going wrong in this process for us, but I am not
I am sorry to waste space on the mailing list for such a simple question,
but can anyone tell me:
1. Does samba_internal backend work with MX records yet?
2. Will BIND9_FLATFILE allow dynamic DNS updates when a computer joins the
domain?
Thanks.
GM
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Gary Maurizi
This is a follow up to my previous...
Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and whats
going wrong in this process for us, but I am not a developer I have no way
of knowing if this will be useful to yo
Myself and another person ran into this a few months back. We couldn't find
a solution.
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-March/172368.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-April/172670.html
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I have tried everything, This i
I have tried everything, This is CentOS 6.4 with SELinux DISABLED, Bind
version BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17, samba 4.0.6 downloaded as a tar.gz
from samba.org -- I have read EVERY maillinglist, IRC Log, how-to on
google, tutorial on samba.org, and many many people have had this problem
and not
I think this depends on whether "Register this connection's address in DNS"
is checked.
See the screenshot at:
http://serverfault.com/questions/303026/what-do-all-the-settings-in-the-advanced-tcp-ip-properties-dns-tab-mean
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chris Rowson
wrote:
> Having reconfigur
Having reconfigured Samba4 to use BIND as a DNS server to get dynamic DNS
updates working, I'm still working to understand the system.
The Windows client I'm testing only seems up update DNS if I run ipconfig
/registerdns. It doesn't update DNS at startup or IP change OOTB. Is it
expected that Win
Hi
Banging my head against a wall with this. Dynamic dns updates for windows
clients are failing.
Log exceprt:
Apr 13 00:20:50 server named[30147]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of
signer=newboywin7\$\@example.lan name=newboywin7.example.lan type=
error=insufficient access rights
Apr 13
Hi
Banging my head against a wall with this. Dynamic dns updates for windows
clients are failing.
Log exceprt:
Apr 13 00:20:50 server named[30147]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of
signer=newboywin7\$\@example.lan name=newboywin7.example.lan type=
error=insufficient access rights
Apr 13
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the information. I did as you suggested and ran named in
debug mode and issued 'ipconfig /registerdns' from the client. The
output was similar to your post:
failed gss_inquire_cred: GSSAPI error: Major = Unspecified GSS
failure. Minor code may provide more information, Mi
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Jones <
lloydsyst...@fastmail.com.au> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while ago I setup Samba4 on CentOS 6. Samba version was 4.0.0 using
> the RPM from SOGo. I used the DLZ BIND backend with BIND 9.8.
>
> I tested with a Windows 7 VM client. When I joined the clien
Hi,
A while ago I setup Samba4 on CentOS 6. Samba version was 4.0.0 using
the RPM from SOGo. I used the DLZ BIND backend with BIND 9.8.
I tested with a Windows 7 VM client. When I joined the client to the
domain it was automatically added to the AD DNS and appeared in the
Windows DNS Manager.
Hi guys,
I'm having a struggle with Dynamic DNS updates. When i join a Windows
machine to the domain the host name get registered. When I change the IP
the A-record gets deleted and nothing more happens. I'm using the internal
dns with Samba 4.
Any help or advice would be much appreciated.
log:
31 matches
Mail list logo