“My main concern is that most places I have seen that kept with ypbind get
replaced with Active Directory”
In fact, we’re in the process of doing that now. We’ve got user logins and
groups working well. The next challenge is the automount maps. It’s not a bad
thing, in fact it has made our Wind
On 08/01/15 02:26, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:27:32PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 7 January 2015 at 17:06, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
[...snip...]
>> And I expect that you had at that point still stories from people saying
>> NIS broke everything when it
On 07/01/2015 22:23, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:35:46PM +, Roderick Johnstone wrote:
With the update that came in this morning from fastbugs,
gdbm-1.8.0-37.el6.x86_64, I now get:
# make
gmake[1]: Entering directory `xxx'
Updating auto.home...
makedbm: dbm_store:
Hi guys,
if i might add my view onto this matter .. :]
I think the LDAP doesn't complicate things - on the contrary, it
simplify them.
Ofc, the installation and configuration of 389 Directory server (if
speaking about RHEL and clones) is definitely much more demanding in
know-how compared to Y
