Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread Bruce Ferrell
On 07/12/2017 07:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 12/07/17 18:12, Bruce Ferrell wrote: On 7/12/17 5:20 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: I learned it and learned to dislike it even more in that learning. After five years of dealing with it

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 12/07/17 18:12, Bruce Ferrell wrote: >> On 7/12/17 5:20 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> I learned it and learned to dislike it even more in that learning. >> >> After five years of dealing with it I'm still bumping into broken stuff >>

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread Bruce Ferrell
On 07/12/2017 04:49 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 12/07/17 18:12, Bruce Ferrell wrote: On 7/12/17 5:20 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 09/07/17 09:03, Bruce Ferrell wrote: OK, before the flames start I KNOW it's not normal. Has anyone have a method to upgrade glibc beyond 2.12? Upgrading cor

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread David Sommerseth
On 12/07/17 18:12, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > On 7/12/17 5:20 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 09/07/17 09:03, Bruce Ferrell wrote: >>> OK, before the flames start I KNOW it's not normal. >>> >>> Has anyone have a method to upgrade glibc beyond 2.12? >> Upgrading core system libraries, such as glibc u

Re: abrt message?

2017-07-12 Thread David Sommerseth
On 12/07/17 21:04, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > SL 7.3 > > Whenever I "su" to root, I get this message. > > ABRT has detected 1 problem(s). For more info > run: abrt-cli list --since 1499813517 > > # abrt-cli list --since 1499813517 > id cb5d0f1321370b5113631236cf6788374b55

Re: 7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread David Sommerseth
On 12/07/17 22:56, ToddAndMargo wrote: [...snip...] > What I have been doing is slowing moving everything over to Fedora > (26 just came out). I am working on my second Fedora server > this afternoon for a customer. RHEL doesn't work on the C236 chipset> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: 7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread David Sommerseth
On 12/07/17 20:44, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > On a previous post, I was asked why I was always asking about releases. > I responded that Red Hat would fix my bugs, but slate them for future > editions. Here is an example: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288#c14 > >

Re: 7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 07/12/2017 01:56 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: What I have been doing is slowing moving everything over to Fedora (26 just came out). Fedora is the other end of the double edged sword. You get all the new bugs introduced with new revisions. Weyland for instance. So the 64 thousand dollar questio

Re: 7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
2017-07-12 21:44 GMT+03:00 ToddAndMargo : Hi All, On a previous post, I was asked why I was always asking about releases. I responded that Red Hat would fix my bugs, but slate them for future editions. Here is an example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288#c14 "It's

Re: 7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread Oleg Sadov
A possible solution -- creating of your own respin and support the parallel branches of packages that you corrected, before fixing them by the TUV. For example, in our SL respin -- NauLinux we supported our own branches of kernel and Evolution (corresponded to upstream updates) about half a year un

abrt message?

2017-07-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, SL 7.3 Whenever I "su" to root, I get this message. ABRT has detected 1 problem(s). For more info run: abrt-cli list --since 1499813517 # abrt-cli list --since 1499813517 id cb5d0f1321370b5113631236cf6788374b5508ac reason: file-roller killed by SIGSEGV t

7.5?

2017-07-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, On a previous post, I was asked why I was always asking about releases. I responded that Red Hat would fix my bugs, but slate them for future editions. Here is an example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288#c14 "It's currently planned for 7.5." It was reported

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread Bruce Ferrell
On 7/12/17 5:20 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 09/07/17 09:03, Bruce Ferrell wrote: OK, before the flames start I KNOW it's not normal. Has anyone have a method to upgrade glibc beyond 2.12? Upgrading core system libraries, such as glibc usually requires a full rebuild of all applications. Wh

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:09PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > > Systemd isn't standing in my way any more. > I do not feel this way. Specifically, NFS-Root is an important function for us - we often run "diskless" machines - and I feel it only works with systemd "by accident". In theory, s

Re: glibc revisions on 6.9

2017-07-12 Thread David Sommerseth
On 09/07/17 09:03, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > OK, before the flames start I KNOW it's not normal. > > Has anyone have a method to upgrade glibc beyond 2.12? Upgrading core system libraries, such as glibc usually requires a full rebuild of all applications. Which then results in a brand new distribut