On 06/05/2015 05:21 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
Rhel won't change package management tools mid release, and they
shouldn't.
Rhel 8 will likely use dnf.
So it will be the dandified yellowdog updater - modified. yay.
I guess the name 'dnf' is no worse than any othe
number of the longstanding
init script problems.
dnf is only replacing one system, and doesn't actually solve any of
the genuine long-standing problems with the original toolkit.
s/dns/systemd/g and get the same debate, imo
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:09 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jamie Duncan
> wrote:
> > Rhel won't change package management tools mid release, and they
> shouldn't.
> >
> > Rhel 8 wi
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
> Rhel won't change package management tools mid release, and they shouldn't.
>
> Rhel 8 will likely use dnf.
And retain yum for compatibility It still relias on the same
fundamentally over-engineered upstreadm repository me
Rhel won't change package management tools mid release, and they
shouldn't.
Rhel 8 will likely use dnf.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 4:15 PM Jim Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 03:07 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > FC22 had replac
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 03:07 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> FC22 had replaced yum with dnf. Same command syntax.
> I have used dnf on fc22 and rather like it.
>
> Will we be seeing it in a future SL7.x release?
>
> -T
My guess would be no. If it were to
Hi All,
FC22 had replaced yum with dnf. Same command syntax.
I have used dnf on fc22 and rather like it.
Will we be seeing it in a future SL7.x release?
-T
