RE: IIS listens to port 80 on 0.0.0.0

2002-09-25 Thread Sarbjit Singh Gill
Tried that KB article already. Does not work. I just need the IIS service to listen to 80 on the IP that I want it to. Cheers Gill -Original Message- From: Craig Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread voguemaster
Ok, first and foremost, thank you for your reply :) I just wanted to make some comments: > >SSH first and foremost is a terminal program. I believe your first >post was something to the effect of "Telnet over SSL, or SSH, help me >decide". I was NOT the original poster to the list. I wanted

Re: BIG MAMA !!

2002-09-25 Thread Shaolin Tiger
No I would say it is a most a form of brute force, but pure brute force as most people consider it would be a b c... aa ab ac ... aaa aab abb etc etc Shaolin .: http://www.security-forums.com :. Share your knowledge It's a way to achieve Immortality. -

Re: Snort IDS

2002-09-25 Thread Gene Yoo
You may want to search the list... there was alot of comparison done between N/H-IDS' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi everyone!!!, I'm an EDP auditor and I want to know some commentaries >about the use of Snort IDS...I'de like to know if anyone recommend it and >if it's a good choice to install i

RE: BIG MAMA !!

2002-09-25 Thread Chris Berry
*shrug* Depends on your definition I guess, but if you use software like LC4 from @Stake running the dictionary attack with variants is WAY faster than brute force for anything but a truly good password. When I first tested it, it cracked one of my low security ones that had mixed case, number

Re: BIG MAMA !!

2002-09-25 Thread Frederick Garbrecht
Well, in general usage, a dictionary attack and a brute force attack are considered different things. Whereas a dictionary attack attempts to exploit the well documented phenomenon that the vast majority of users choose passwords out of a very limited range of the available 'symbol space', i.e. di

RE: MASTERS DEGREE PROGRAMS IN SECURITY

2002-09-25 Thread Roger Bou Aoun
Hi there, concerning the program it is a bit Computer Science oriented, if you are interested in doing it either online or on campus why don't u have a look at these: USA: http://www.capitol-college.edu/academics/grad/msns.html they offer MS in Network Security and there program is Interestin

Computer Security News

2002-09-25 Thread Meritt James
I go to the following URLs for computer security news pretty much daily. Anyone have any place else that I could look for that specific type of news (I have other general news sites, but they are not generally specific enough). http://www.atstake.com/security_news/ http://www.securityfocus.com/n

Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-25 Thread Schuler, Jeff
I am looking for information regarding the insecurities and vulnerabilities that exist in Network Address Translation. One of our admins feels that because everything is NAT'd that there is no way anyone can break into the systems that are NAT'd. I know that this is not a completely accurate sta

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread Chris Berry
I tend to agree that this has already been aswered, but I'll say it in another way so we can get past this. SSL-Secure Sockets Layer: Basically an add on bandaid type approach to make inheirently insecure connections like telnet and ftp more secure by encrypting transmissions at the SOCKET le

Ports->Process on Win NT/2k

2002-09-25 Thread R Pradeep Chandran
Hi All, Is there any utility which provides information on the owner(?) of a socket on Win NT/2k? What I want, is to find out which process has opened a socket on the machine. For example, if netstat shows that a process is listening on port 80, I should be able to use this utility and fin

RE: IIS listens to port 80 on 0.0.0.0

2002-09-25 Thread Sarbjit Singh Gill
Problem solved. Initially I was using Zone Alarm. I created the trusted zone and created host in the trusted zone. The trusted host was 127.0.0.1. Nothing seemed to work. Changing IP to listen to port 80 also did not change the 0.0.0.0 mapping to 80. I finally shut down zone alarm. started NEOWA

RE: IIS listens to port 80 on 0.0.0.0

2002-09-25 Thread Sarbjit Singh Gill
Yes, my IIS is not receiving any requests at all. Telnet to the webserver on port 80 does not work. Using IIS service manager to change listening port, also does not work. When you guys were saying it is a feature of IIS to listen to 0.0.0.0, it should be listening to only the IP that the IIS is

Re: Snort IDS

2002-09-25 Thread Brad Arlt
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:07:29PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everyone!!!, I'm an EDP auditor and I want to know some > commentaries about the use of Snort IDS...I'de like to know if > anyone recommend it and if it's a good choice to install in a > financial organization. We use snort.

Re: BIG MAMA !!

2002-09-25 Thread chris albert
>>Security Newsletters-TM wrote: > I thought that using a dictionary is still considered brute force. > Call the set of all possible passwords the 'keyspace'. Brute force is checking the entire keyspace. Dictionaries represent 'human-friendly strings', say words easy to memorize. This is a frac

Re: RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread voguemaster
You're right of course, and no need to apologize at all. In my post I didn't mean to ask people to show me the gory details of how to use SSH or SSL. I believe the original poster asked about differences in SSH vs. SSL when used as a remote login solution. What I was just asking is different in so

Re: Snort IDS

2002-09-25 Thread Bennett Todd
2002-09-23-18:07:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I'm an EDP auditor and I want to know some commentaries about the > use of Snort IDS...I'de like to know if anyone recommend it and if > it's a good choice to install in a financial organization. I'm a security analyst working in a financial organization.

RE: IIS listens to port 80 on 0.0.0.0

2002-09-25 Thread Craig Humphrey
It's a "feature" of IIS5. By default it listens on port 80 on all available IP addresses (0.0.0.0). This can be fixed: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q238131&; Hope that helps. > -Original Message- > From: Sarbjit Singh Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tu

RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread Vachon, Scott
>Just one example: can I code a client/server applications and encrypt and >do authentication with SSL/SSH tunneling ? I've no idea, not from the >things I've read about those two. Yeah, SSH is a secure login and shell >for a remote system. That I know. It's more than that, isn't it ?? >I'm sorry