Re: Hardening VS firewalling ?

2002-01-08 Thread Mark A. Lewis
Both are important. An IIS box with no patches installed behind the greatest firewall in the world would still be vulnerable to code red, nimda, unicode and all that good stuff if port 80 was getting to it. A completely patched server with no firewall would be available to be compromised on a

RE: Tcp-wrapper question !

2001-11-12 Thread Mark A Lewis
Tcp wrappers are to limit who can connect to a particular service on a box by IP. I don't know enough to tell you how to disallow that user telnet access. But I don't think TCP wrappers are the answer since they are not user aware. -Original Message- From: Daniel Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Outlook & FTP Passwords

2001-11-12 Thread Mark A Lewis
These are inherently insecure protocols. There are ways to secure them but they require both client and servers that support this. So unless every FTP and web site you goto are setup for this i.e. SSL and your ISP supports it for your e-mail you are pretty much stuck. The best option is to practic

RE: Location of web root

2001-11-08 Thread Mark A Lewis
The best reason is that directory traversal (unicode) attacks don't work. This is the method that CR used to put in the "backdoor". It moved cmd.exe from c:\winnt\system32 to c:\inetpub\wwwroot\scripts and renamed it to root.exe . This would not be possible if it were on a separate drive or partit