]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
>From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Right on their website ;-)
>
>Their site looks different today than it did in October of 2001.
>
>Also, I have received an e-mail explaining that their Tier 1 and Tier 2
>
Or who has the prettiest ad in a magazine that "the Boss" just saw...
*sob* If only the way you said was what usually happened...
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ok guys, enought with this thread already.
>
> Usually the the choice of firewall is often dictated by the management in
> terms o
Ok guys, enought with this thread already.
Usually the the choice of firewall is often dictated by the management in
terms of price/performance
If you have the buck and security is foremost , go get yourself application
proxy firewalls
like cyberguard, gauntlet, bordwareware, sidewinder.
If no
Really CheckPoint-1 Depends on what operating system it is installed
on. I have had really bad experiences (performance wise) when it was
installed on a windows machine. I have never had any real complaints
with PIX. It was built for firewalling. I cannot give you any
information on NetScreen.
Kev
If we have 3 services in one when this fail or is compromized the 3 services are
Maybe is cheaper, but I do not like the final resoult.
De: Ernest Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2003 07:16 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: Firewall recommendations
When I found myself stuck with NetScreen, in November of
1999, having come from a PIX environment, I pretty quickly
built a shopping list of things that I felt they needed to
fix or, in some cases, implement.
I stumbled across my list around September of 2000. At
least 80% of the items on my
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:05 PM
> To: 'Thorsten Dampf -- 7stein.net'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
>
> Hi at my current job we use checkpoint, and I personally love that firewall
>
From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Right on their website ;-)
Their site looks different today than it did in October of 2001.
Also, I have received an e-mail explaining that their Tier 1 and Tier 2
Techs are outsourced. Tier 3 is in-house. Tier 1 I understand, but Tier 2?
Most companie
.
***
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
> Right on their website ;-)
Their site looks different today than it did in Octo
t, You may mail
me privately.
Regards,
Planz
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Donahue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Thorsten Dampf -- 7stein.net'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
ms Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Bhavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
I have no comments on the technical support of NetScreen but there is one
more thing to be conside
.
-Original Message-
From: Bhavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
I have no comments on the technical support of NetScreen but there is
one more thing to be considered. As a tech support
> Right on their website ;-)
Their site looks different today than it did in October of 2001.
Also, I have received an e-mail explaining that their Tier 1 and Tier 2
Techs are outsourced. Tier 3 is in-house. Tier 1 I understand, but Tier 2?
Most companies as far as I know would not make you get
.
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
While I see people recommend NetScreen, I can not based on my experience
with their techs, which includes level 2 techs.
While
March 07, 2003 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: Firewall recommendations?
>
>
> Take a look at the watchguard products. www.watchguard.com
>
> Regards, Thorsten
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: [EM
http://www.netscreen.com/products/firewall_wpaper.html
Right on their website ;-)
At 10:47 AM 3/10/2003 -0800, you wrote:
While I see people recommend NetScreen, I can not based on my experience
with their techs, which includes level 2 techs.
While researching options for a firewall for a client,
While I see people recommend NetScreen, I can not based on my experience
with their techs, which includes level 2 techs.
While researching options for a firewall for a client, none of the techs at
NetScreen that I talked to could answer a basic question: Does NetScreen
firewall do stateful packet
I've worked with Netscreen, PIX, Borderware, Linux IPCHAINS, Linux
IPTABLES, Firewall Toolkit, Socks, and Raptor...not to mention the SOHO
products like Netgear.
Of these products, Netscreen blew the most smoke up the customer's butt.
The device was supposed to load balance for our web servers
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
I am a big fan of Netscreen, www.netscreen.com. SonicWall is good also,
www.sonicwall.com.
mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
avid Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:05 PM
To: 'Thorsten Dampf -- 7stein.net'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
Hi at my current job we use checkpoint, and I personally love that firewall
pr
x27;s fulfilled your requirements need for you firewall.
cheers
marendra
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:42 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
I am a big f
ISA's not a bad product.
That being said, it is not the end-all-and-be-all of security solutions
either. If security is important, you can run a filtering router
behind your ISA server (on a non-MS OS for added defence in depth) and
this is what I would do. You could use a Cisco solution, a
'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Firewall recommendations?
Hi at my current job we use checkpoint, and I personally love that firewall
product. I am not a big fan of the pix and I have never played with the ISA
server cause it is a microsoft product
I am a big fan of Netscreen, www.netscreen.com. SonicWall is good also,
www.sonicwall.com.
mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewall recommendations?
I am in charge of
Hi,
I have exposure to all the FW products you have listed in a commercial
environment. One that you have missed, and really should consider is
netscreen. http://www.netscreen.com/main.html
I, personally would ISA as a proxy, only a proxy, sitting behind a
firewall of some sort.
- CheckPoint - b
Dampf -- 7stein.net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Firewall recommendations?
Take a look at the watchguard products. www.watchguard.com
Regards, Thorsten
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAI
I think you're on the right track when looking at ipchains (which
actually has been replaced by iptables/netfilter). You can use freeswan
as an add-on to the linux based firewall which will give you vpn
support. Also, there is support under linux for pptp and l2tp with some
features turned on
Take a look at the watchguard products. www.watchguard.com
Regards, Thorsten
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. März 2003 21:05
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Firewall recommendations?
>
I am in charge of researching a firewall to replace what we currently
have. At my previous job I had used Microsoft ISA in a low-security
environment, and was happy with its features, and its integration with
the Windows environment there. However, at my current job, security is a
much grea
29 matches
Mail list logo
