the sinonim would be MASQERADING (from linux world)
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "SecurityBasics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 5:23 AM
> Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabiliti
I think, the sinonim would be MASQERADING (from linux world)
- Original Message -
From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SecurityBasics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 5:23 AM
Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?
&g
r 14, 2001 12:56 AM
To: 'Reaves, Timothy CECOM RDEC STCD JANUS'; SecurityBasics
Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?
Hi,
PAT is Port Address Translation, it is also called NAT overload. Instead of
mapping internal IPs to external IPs, it maps internal IPs to external
sour
> -Original Message-
> From: Reaves, Timothy CECOM RDEC STCD JANUS
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:26 PM
> To: SecurityBasics
> Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?
>
> could someone please explain PAT?
Instead
--
From: Reaves, Timothy CECOM RDEC STCD JANUS
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:26 PM
To: SecurityBasics
Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?
could someone please explain PAT?
Thanks
could someone please explain PAT?
Thanks
Couple of thoughts off the top of my head:
1) The router itself may have vulnerabilities - see
the relatively recent incidents with the Alcatel
routers, and the 3Com DSL routers, an older one with
Zyxel Prestige routers, the @Home cable modem
enumerations
2) What about if you get hit with a tr
> This strikes me as somewhat of a bonehead question,
> but it's something that's bothered me for awhile:
>
> Let's say I have DSL at home. Let's also say that I
> have a single public IP address, but my internal LAN
> uses private addressing. The DSL router performs some
> sort of NAT or P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Snipped down to last paragraph
"So it seems to me that if you use NAT/PAT, you don't
need a real firewall unless you're actually permitting
some kind of traffic to connect to something from the
outside.
Is that right?
- -- Dee"
Hi Dee,
A lot of f
vember 27, 2001 3:14 PM
To: SecurityBasics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?
This strikes me as somewhat of a bonehead question,
but it's something that's bothered me for awhile:
Let's say I have DSL at home. Let's also say that I
have a
This strikes me as somewhat of a bonehead question,
but it's something that's bothered me for awhile:
Let's say I have DSL at home. Let's also say that I
have a single public IP address, but my internal LAN
uses private addressing. The DSL router performs some
sort of NAT or PAT (probably PAT her
11 matches
Mail list logo
